Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION et al. v. NOVOTNY (1979)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION et al. v. NOVOTNY
Term: 1978
Important Dates
Argued: April 18, 1979
Decided: June 11, 1979
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Harry BlackmunWarren BurgerWilliam RehnquistPotter Stewart
Concurring
Lewis PowellJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
William BrennanThurgood MarshallByron White

GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION et al. v. NOVOTNY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 11, 1979. The case was argued before the court on April 18, 1979.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Western U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1970s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - Sex discrimination in employment (cf. sex discrimination)
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 442 U.S. 366
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Potter Stewart

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes