Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

GREEN v. BOCK LAUNDRY MACHINE CO. (1989)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
GREEN v. BOCK LAUNDRY MACHINE CO.
Term: 1988
Important Dates
Argued: January 18, 1989
Decided: May 22, 1989
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Majority
Anthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
Antonin Scalia
Dissenting
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood Marshall

GREEN v. BOCK LAUNDRY MACHINE CO. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 22, 1989. The case was argued before the court on January 18, 1989.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including Supreme Court Rules, application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in civil litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and state rules and admiralty rules
  • Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 490 U.S. 504
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes