Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. et al. (1958)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1957 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 10, 1958 |
| Decided: April 7, 1958 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • Harold Burton • Tom Clark • William Douglas • Earl Warren |
| Dissenting |
| Felix Frankfurter • John Harlan II • Charles Whittaker |
GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 7, 1958. The case was argued before the court on March 10, 1958.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Massachusetts U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Sufficiency of evidence: typically in the context of a jury's determination of compensation for injury or death
- Petitioner: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Government contractor
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 356 U.S. 252
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
