Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (1937)

![]() |
HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW |
---|
Term: 1937 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 18, 1937 |
Decided: November 8, 1937 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone |
Dissenting |
Pierce Butler • James Clark McReynolds • George Sutherland |
HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 8, 1937. The case was argued before the court on October 18, 1937.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Iowa State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Respondent state: Iowa
- Citation: 302 U.S. 95
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Benjamin Nathan Cardozo
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes