Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (1937)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW
Term: 1937
Important Dates
Argued: October 18, 1937
Decided: November 8, 1937
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Majority
Hugo BlackLouis Dembitz BrandeisBenjamin Nathan CardozoCharles Evans HughesOwen Josephus RobertsHarlan Fiske Stone
Dissenting
Pierce ButlerJames Clark McReynoldsGeorge Sutherland

HALE et al. v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 8, 1937. The case was argued before the court on October 18, 1937.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Iowa State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
  • Petitioner: Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
  • Respondent state: Iowa
  • Citation: 302 U.S. 95
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Benjamin Nathan Cardozo

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes