Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

HANOVER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HARDING, COUNTY TREASURER (1926)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
HANOVER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HARDING, COUNTY TREASURER
Term: 1926
Important Dates
Argued: October 18, 1926
Decided: November 23, 1926
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerOliver Wendell HolmesJames Clark McReynoldsEdward Terry SanfordHarlan Fiske StoneGeorge SutherlandWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter

HANOVER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HARDING, COUNTY TREASURER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 23, 1926. The case was argued before the court on October 18, 1926.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Illinois State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
  • Petitioner: Insurance company, or surety
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Respondent state: Illinois
  • Citation: 272 U.S. 494
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Howard Taft

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes