HARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CONNAUGHTON (1989)

![]() |
HARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CONNAUGHTON |
---|
Term: 1988 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 20, 1989 |
Decided: June 22, 1989 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • Sandra Day O'Connor • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Harry Blackmun • Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Byron White |
HARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CONNAUGHTON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 1989. The case was argued before the court on March 20, 1989.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - Libel, defamation: defamation of public officials and public and private persons
- Petitioner: Newspaper, newsletter, journal of opinion, news service
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 491 U.S. 657
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes