Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

HAUSSKNECHT VS. CLAYPOOL et al. (1862)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
HAUSSKNECHT VS. CLAYPOOL et al.
Term: 1861
Important Dates
Argued: March 10, 1862
Decided: March 17, 1862
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-0
Majority
John Catron • Nathan Clifford • Robert Cooper Grier • Samuel Nelson • Noah Haynes Swayne • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne

HAUSSKNECHT VS. CLAYPOOL et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 17, 1862. The case was argued before the court on March 10, 1862.

In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Ohio U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Ohio.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1860s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Private Action - Evidence
  • Petitioner: Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Seller or vendor
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 66 U.S. 431
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Samuel Nelson

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=HAUSSKNECHT_VS._CLAYPOOL_et_al._(1862)&oldid=9493484"