HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE (1838)

![]() |
HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE |
---|
Term: 1838 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 26, 1838 |
Decided: February 6, 1838 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-0 |
Majority |
Philip Pendelton Barbour • John McKinley • John McLean • Joseph Story • Smith Thompson |
Concurring |
Henry Baldwin • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne |
HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 6, 1838. The case was argued before the court on January 26, 1838.
In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: jurisdiction (jurisdiction over non-resident litigants)
- Petitioner: Shipper, including importer and exporter
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Water transportation, stevedore
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 37 U.S. 300
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Philip Pendelton Barbour
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes