Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE (1838)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE
Term: 1838
Important Dates
Argued: January 26, 1838
Decided: February 6, 1838
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
8-0
Majority
Philip Pendelton BarbourJohn McKinleyJohn McLeanJoseph StorySmith Thompson
Concurring
Henry BaldwinRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne

HENRY TOLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. HORATIO SPRAGUE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 6, 1838. The case was argued before the court on January 26, 1838.

In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: jurisdiction (jurisdiction over non-resident litigants)
  • Petitioner: Shipper, including importer and exporter
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Water transportation, stevedore
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 37 U.S. 300
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Philip Pendelton Barbour

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes