Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
HILL, WARDEN, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. WAMPLER (1936)

| HILL, WARDEN, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. WAMPLER |
|---|
| Term: 1935 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: May 4, 1936 |
| Decided: May 18, 1936 |
| Outcome |
| Certification to or from a lower court |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland • Willis Van Devanter |
HILL, WARDEN, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. WAMPLER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 18, 1936. The case was argued before the court on May 4, 1936.
The U.S. Supreme Court examined the lower court's certified question. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - subconstitutional fair procedure: miscellaneous
- Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Petitioner state: United States
- Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 298 U.S. 460
- How the court took jurisdiction: Certification
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Benjamin Nathan Cardozo
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes