Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
HOMERO GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES (2008)

![]() |
HOMERO GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES |
---|
Term: 2007 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 8, 2008 |
Decided: May 12, 2008 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Antonin Scalia |
Dissenting |
Clarence Thomas |
HOMERO GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 12, 2008. The case was argued before the court on January 8, 2008.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Texas Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - subconstitutional fair procedure: miscellaneous
- Petitioner: Defendant
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: United States
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 553 U.S. 242
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes