Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al. (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al.
Term: 1987
Important Dates
Argued: November 9, 1987
Decided: January 20, 1988
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-2
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood MarshallJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
William Rehnquist
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'ConnorAntonin Scalia

HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 20, 1988. The case was argued before the court on November 9, 1987.

In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - handicapped, rights of: under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and related statutes
  • Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 484 U.S. 305
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Brennan

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes