HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al. (1988)

![]() |
HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al. |
---|
Term: 1987 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 9, 1987 |
Decided: January 20, 1988 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-2 |
Majority |
Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens • Byron White |
Concurring |
William Rehnquist |
Dissenting |
Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia |
HONIG, CALIFORNIA SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION v. DOE et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 20, 1988. The case was argued before the court on November 9, 1987.
In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - handicapped, rights of: under Rehabilitation, Americans with Disabilities Act, and related statutes
- Petitioner: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Student, or applicant for admission to an educational institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 484 U.S. 305
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Brennan
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes