Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
HUMBERTO FERNANDEZ-VARGAS v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL (2006)

![]() |
HUMBERTO FERNANDEZ-VARGAS v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
---|
Term: 2005 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 22, 2006 |
Decided: June 22, 2006 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
John Paul Stevens |
HUMBERTO FERNANDEZ-VARGAS v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 2006. The case was argued before the court on March 22, 2006.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - Deportation (cf. immigration and naturalization)
- Petitioner: Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: attorney general of the United States, or his office
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 548 U.S. 30
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes