HUNT-WESSON, INC. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA (2000)

![]() |
HUNT-WESSON, INC. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA |
---|
Term: 1999 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 12, 2000 |
Decided: February 22, 2000 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
HUNT-WESSON, INC. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 22, 2000. The case was argued before the court on January 12, 2000.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California State Appellate Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: State commission, board, committee, or authority
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 528 U.S. 458
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Stephen Breyer
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes