Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Judicial nominating commissions
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Individual nominating committees
Select a committee in the dropdown below and click "Submit" to view information about that committee.
Methods of judicial selection
Partisan elections
Nonpartisan elections
Michigan method
Retention elections
Assisted appointment
Bar-controlled commission
Governor-controlled commission
Hybrid commission
Legislative elections
Gubernatorial appointment

The Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission is an independent state commission in Hawaii established by Section 4 of Article VI of the Hawaii Constitution that plays a role in the state's judicial selection process. The commission has nine members, selected by a combination of the governor, chief justice of the state supreme court, the state bar, and legislative leadership.[1]

Hawaii uses the assisted appointment method of judicial selection for its state courts. Using this method, the governor appoints state judges from a list of names submitted by the commission. This selection method is used for appointments to all appellate and general jurisdiction courts in the state.

The commission is a hybrid commission, which means that there is no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state bar association. As of September 5, 2025, 11 states used this type of commission. To learn more about controlling majorities in judicial selection commissions, click here.

Members

Last updated: April 2025

The commission has nine members. No more than four members may be lawyers. Two members each are appointed by the governor, state Senate president, state House speaker, and Hawaii State Bar Association, with the final member appointed by the chief justice of the Hawaii Supreme Court. Members of the commission serve staggered six-year terms.[1]

Members of the Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission, April 2025
Name Appointed by Term-end date
Chair - Florence T. Nakakuni House Speaker April 1, 2029
Vice chair - Kamani B. Kualaʻau House Speaker April 1, 2027
Secretary - Francine Dudoit-Tagupa Senate President April 1, 2026
Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Bar Association June 6, 2029
Richard H. S. Sing Bar Association August 2, 2030
Sylvia Yuen Chief Justice April 1, 2028
Edmund D. Acoba Senate President April 1, 2029
David McEwan Governor April 1, 2027
Vacant Governor

Process

In its rules, the commission lays out the following steps for filling a judicial vacancy:[2]

  1. The commission solicits applicants for a judicial vacancy.
  2. The commission eliminates any applicants who are not qualified to hold office.
  3. The commission interviews applicants and conducts background and qualification checks.
  4. The commission selects between four and six applicants to recommend to the governor for consideration.
  5. The governor selects a nominee from the list of recommendations.


The commission's rules provide the following criteria for evaluating prospective judges:[2]

  • integrity and moral courage
  • legal ability and experience
  • intelligence and wisdom
  • compassion and fairness
  • diligence and decisiveness
  • judicial temperament
  • other qualities the commission finds to be important.[3]

Retention process

The commission also determines whether a judge shall be retained. At least six months before the expiration of their term, the judge must notify the commission if they wish to seek retention. If so, the commission asks the public, and specifically lawyers, to submit comments about the judge for the review. The commission may interview individuals who have interacted with the judge in his professional capacity, and input from the judge is also sought. To be retained, at least five members of the commission must vote in favor of retention.[4]

Duties

As of April 2025, the Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission rules did not list specific duties for members of the commission.

Control of judicial selection commissions

Assisted appointment is a method of judicial selection in which a nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[5]

At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types, based on the makeup of the judicial nominating commissions. Those types are:

  • Governor-controlled commission - The governor is either responsible for appointing a majority of the members of the nominating commission or may decline to appoint a candidate from a list provided by the nominating commission.
  • Bar-controlled commission - Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the members of the nominating commission.
  • Hybrid - There is no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state Bar Association. The membership of these commissions is determined by different rules in each state.

Twenty-three courts in 22 states used assisted appointment to select state supreme court justices as of June 2021.[6][7] Hawaii used a hybrid commission. The table below shows the number of courts using each variation of assisted appointment at the state supreme court level.

Assisted appointment methods in state supreme courts
Method Courts (of 23)
Governor-controlled majority 10
Bar-controlled majority 1
Hybrid 12

The map below highlights the states that use each of the three types of assisted appointment.

About judicial selection

Each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they select judges at the state and local level. These methods of selection are:

Election

  • Partisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot alongside a label designating political party affiliation.
  • Nonpartisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot without a label designating party affiliation.
  • Michigan method: State supreme court justices are selected through nonpartisan elections preceded by either partisan primaries or conventions.
  • Retention election: A periodic process whereby voters are asked whether an incumbent judge should remain in office for another term. Judges are not selected for initial terms in office using this election method.

Assisted appointment

  • Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[5] At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types:
    • Bar-controlled commission: Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees that they must choose from.
    • Governor-controlled commission: The governor is responsible for appointing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees they must choose from.
    • Hybrid commission: The judicial nominating commission has no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state bar association. These commissions determine membership in a variety of ways, but no institution or organization has a clear majority control.

Direct appointment

Click a state on the map below to explore judicial selection processes in that state.
http://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_STATE


See also

State courts Appointment methods Election methods
State-Supreme-Courts-Ballotpedia.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Ballotpedia Elections Badge-VOTE.png
State supreme courts
Intermediate appellate courts
Trial courts
Assisted appointment
Court appointment
Gubernatorial appointment
Legislative election
Municipal government selection
Partisan election
Nonpartisan election
Michigan method


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Hawaii State Judiciary, "Judicial Selection Commission," accessed October 7, 2021
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hawaii State Judiciary, "Judicial Selection Commission Rules," accessed April 11, 2025
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Hawaii; Judicial Nominating Commissions," accessed October 7, 2021
  5. 5.0 5.1 American Bar Association, "Judicial Selection: The Process of Choosing Judges," June 2008 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "ambaroverview" defined multiple times with different content
  6. As of June 2021, Oklahoma had two state supreme courts: one for civil matters and one for criminal matters.
  7. North Dakota uses this method only for vacancies.