Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Hawaii Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Special state legislative • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • Municipal • All other local • How to run for office
Flag of Hawaii.png


Hawaii Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment

Flag of Hawaii.png

Election date

November 5, 2024

Topic
Family-related policy and LGBTQ issues
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



The Hawaii Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment was on the ballot in Hawaii as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported removing a provision of the constitution that states that "the legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples."

A "no" vote opposed removing a provision of the constitution that states that "the legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples."


Election results

Hawaii Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

268,038 55.94%
No 211,142 44.06%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The measure removed a provision of the constitution that stated that "the legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples."[1]

What did supporters and opponents say about the measure?

See also: Support and Opposition

Hawaii's House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs testified that "despite the judicial pronouncement in Obergefell holding persons of the same sex may exercise the fundamental right to marry, the Supreme Court of the United States has recently taken the unprecedented step to eliminate rights the Court has previously recognized. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, eliminated the right to abortion under the United States Constitution.  There is now concern that the Court will revisit its holding in Obergefell.  If the Supreme Court of the United States holds that the United States Constitution does not confer a right to marry for same-sex couples, then under the marriage amendment of the Hawaii State Constitution, the authority to limit marriage in the State of Hawaii is vested in the Legislature. This measure repeals the Legislature's authority to limit marriage."[2]

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Did other states vote to remove same-sex marriage bans from their state constitutions?

See also: Related measures

In 2024, voters in Colorado, California, and Hawaii voted on constitutional amendments to remove same-sex marriage bans.

In 2020, Nevada became the first state to repeal its same-sex marriage ban from its constitution. Along with repealing the 2002 amendment outlawing same-sex marriage, the approved amendment recognized marriage as between couples regardless of gender and stated that religious organizations and clergypersons have the right to refuse to solemnize a marriage. The state legislature referred the measure to the November 2020 ballot, where it was approved with 62.43% of the vote.

How did the amendment get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

This amendment was introduced as House Bill 2802 and was passed in the House on March 5, 2024, by a vote of 43-6. Among the 45 House Democrats, 42 voted in favor and one voted against. Among the six House Republicans, one voted in favor and one voted against. The Senate passed the amendment on April 9, 2024, in a vote of 24-1. All 23 Senate Democrats voted in favor of the amendment. Of the two Senate Republicans, one voted in favor and one voted against.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

Shall the state constitution be amended to repeal the legislature's authority to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples?[3]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article I, Hawaii Constitution

The measure repealed Section 23 of Article I of the state constitution. The following struck-through text was deleted and underlined text was added.[1]

MARRIAGE

Section 23. The legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples. [3]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 15, and the FRE is 20. The word count for the ballot title is 18.


Support

Vote Yes for Marriage Equality led the campaign in support of the amendment.[4]

Supporters

Political Parties

Organizations

  • ACLU of Hawaii
  • Chamber of Sustainable Commerce
  • Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement
  • Hawaii AFL-CIO
  • Hawaii Cannabis Industry Association
  • Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center
  • Hawaii LGBT Legacy Foundation
  • Hawaii Rainbow Chamber Of Commerce
  • Japanese American Citizens League Honolulu Chapter
  • Kona Pride


Arguments

  • Change 23: "This measure fortifies Hawaii’s position as a national leader in civic equality for sexual and gender minorities. For decades, Hawaiʻi laws have prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in public accommodations, housing, employment, and jury service. In recent years legal protections have been extended on the basis of gender and gender identity. In 2022, Hawaiʻi established an LGBTQ+ Commission to “recommend legislative and administrative action on equal treatment and opportunities” for LGBTQ+ residents, among other functions. This measure does not interfere with the First Amendment rights of religious entities to solemnize marriages in a manner consistent with its doctrinal tenets and sectarian beliefs."
  • Jeff Hong, chair of the Change 23 Coalition: "People don't realize that you leave these mistakes in your constitution. There's similar things happening with abortion rights in many jurisdictions, they're like 'This is a done deal,' and then pow, right after the Dobbs decision, abortion is illegal in their jurisdictions, right? And so you don't want to leave it in there."
  • State Rep. Adrian Tam (D-24): "We passed out of the House the first step to removing discriminatory language that should’ve never been in the constitution in the first place and unfairly excluded the LGBTQ+ community for the past 26 years. Our constitution should reflect inclusivity, embracing the rights of every individual, including the LGBTQ+ community."


Opposition

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Hawaii ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through November 5, 2024.


Vote Yes for Marriage Equality registered to support the amendment. The committee reported $81,972.01 in contributions.[5]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $81,472.01 $500.00 $81,972.01 $70,419.59 $70,919.59
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $81,472.01 $500.00 $81,972.01 $70,419.59 $70,919.59

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the amendment.[5]

Committees in support of Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Vote Yes for Marriage Equality $81,472.01 $500.00 $81,972.01 $70,419.59 $70,919.59
Total $81,472.01 $500.00 $81,972.01 $70,419.59 $70,919.59

Donors

The five top donors to the support campaign were as follows:[5]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Hawaii Civil Rights Voter Education Fund $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
HSTA Political Action Fund $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00
Column NA/FBO/Alohilani Resort Waikiki $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00
Human Rights Campaign $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00
JACL of Hawaii Honolulu Chapter $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00

Opposition

If you are aware of a committee registered to oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is protected under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Consequently, same-sex marriage bans have been struck down as unconstitutional and same-sex marriages performed out-of-state must be recognized in other states.[6] Justice Anthony Kennedy authored the opinion and Justices Ruth Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined.

History of marriage in Hawaii

In 1998, Hawaii adopted a constitutional amendment adding language to the state constitution stating "The legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples." Voters approved the amendment with 71% of voters in favor and 29% opposed.

In 2013, the state passed the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act, which made Hawaii the 15th state to allow for same-sex marriage.[2]

Same-sex marriage measures

See also: History of same-sex marriage ballot measures

Between 1998 and 2012, voters in 30 states approved ballot measures that defined marriage as between one male and one female or otherwise prohibited same-sex marriage. The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated bans on same-sex marriage in the case Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015.


In 2020, Nevada became the first state to repeal its same-sex marriage ban from its constitution. Along with repealing the 2002 amendment outlawing same-sex marriage, the approved amendment recognized marriage as between couples regardless of gender and stated that religious organizations and clergypersons have the right to refuse to solemnize a marriage. The state legislature referred the measure to the November 2020 ballot, where it was approved with 62.43% of the vote.

Measures to repeal state constitutional same-sex marriage bans in 2024

The following table provides a list of measures to repeal same-sex marriage bans from states' constitutions in 2024:

State Type Title Description Result Yes Votes No Votes
CA

LRCA

Proposition 3 Repeal Proposition 8 and establish a right to marry

Approveda

9,477,435 (63%)

5,658,187 (37%)

CO

LRCA

Amendment J Remove the provision of the state constitution that says "Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state"

Approveda

1,982,200 (64%)

1,099,228 (36%)

HI

LRCA

Remove Legislature Authority to Limit Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Amendment Remove provision of the constitution saying that "the legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples"

Approveda

268,038 (56%)

211,142 (44%)


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Hawaii Constitution

The state process

The Hawaii State Legislature can put a proposed amendment on the ballot upon either a two-thirds (66.67%) majority vote in both chambers of the legislature in the same session or two simple majority votes in both chambers held in two successive sessions. Constitutional amendments must be approved by a majority of the votes cast for the question, as long as the majority also is at least 50% of the total votes cast in the entire election. For measures approved at special elections by a majority of votes cast for the question, the majority must be at least 30% of the total number of registered voters in the state at the time.

This amendment was introduced as House Bill 2802 and was passed in the House on March 5, 2024, by a vote of 43-6. Among the 45 House Democrats, 42 voted in favor and one voted against. Among the six House Republicans, one voted in favor and one voted against. The Senate passed the amendment on April 9, 2024, in a vote of 24-1. All 23 Senate Democrats voted in favor of the amendment. Of the two Senate Republicans, one voted in favor and one voted against.[1]

Vote in the Hawaii House of Representatives
March 5, 2024
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote in each chamber; or a simple majority vote in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 34  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4362
Total percent84.31%11.76%3.92%
Democrat4212
Republican150

Vote in the Hawaii State Senate
April 9, 2024
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote in each chamber; or a simple majority vote in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2410
Total percent96.00%4.00%0.00%
Democrat2300
Republican110

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Hawaii

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Hawaii.

How to vote in Hawaii


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Hawaii Legislature, "House Bill 2802 (2024)," accessed March 13, 2024
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hawaii State Legislature, "House Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs testimony on HB 2802," accessed April 11, 2024
  3. 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Yes for Marriage Equality, "Home," accessed November 1, 2024
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Hawaii Campaign Finance Reporting System, "Vote Yes for Marriage Equality," accessed August 1, 2024
  6. SupremeCourt.gov, "Obergefell v. Hodges, No. 14-556," June 26, 2015
  7. State of Hawaii - Office of Elections, "Voting in Hawaii," accessed July 19, 2024
  8. Hawaii State Legislature, "HB1248," accessed March 21, 2023
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 State of Hawaii Office of Elections, "Registration," accessed July 19, 2024
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 State of Hawaii Office of Elections, "Voter Registration and Permanent Absentee Application," accessed July 19, 2024
  11. State of Hawaii Office of Elections, "Hawaii Voter Registration Application," accessed November 1, 2024
  12. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."