Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Historical North Dakota budget and finance information

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.


The historical North Dakota budget and finance information below applies to years prior to the most current fiscal year. With the exception of the tab labeled "Prior fiscal year budgets," the tabs below display information, from several different fiscal years, as it was presented on Ballotpedia in prior calendar years. For more current information regarding North Dakota's budget and finances, click here.

As published 2016

North Dakota budget and finances
Budget Policy Logo.png
General information
Budget calendar:
Biennial
Fiscal year:
2017
State credit rating:
AAA (as of 2014)
Current governor:
Jack Dalrymple
Financial figures
Total spending (state and federal funds):
$7.7 billion (estimated for 2015)
Per capita spending:
$10,236.13 (estimated for 2015)
Total state tax collections:
$6.1 billion (2014)
Per capita tax collections:
$8,270.41 (2014)
State debt:
$9.3 billion (as of 2014)
Per capita state debt:
$13,241 (as of 2014)

Public Policy Logo-one line.png
State budget and finance pagesTotal state expendituresState debtTax policy in North Dakota

In North Dakota, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicing state debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as the Affordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between fiscal years 2014 and 2015, total government spending in North Dakota increased by approximately $1.2 billion—from $6.6 billion in fiscal year 2014 to an estimated $7.7 billion in 2015. This represents a 15.1-percent increase.[1][2][3]
  • In North Dakota in fiscal year 2014, 30.2 percent of total tax revenues came from sales and gross receipts.
  • Education accounted for 33.1 percent of state expenditures in fiscal year 2015, while 12.9 percent went to Medicaid.
  • The North Dakota state budget and financial data presented here come from different years because the states and the federal government report and publish the information at different times.

    Definitions

    The following terms are used to describe a state's finances:

    • Revenues come mainly from tax collections, licensing fees, federal aid, and returns on investments.
    • Expenditures generally include spending on government salaries, infrastructure, education, public pensions, public assistance, corrections, Medicaid, and transportation.
    • State debt refers to the money borrowed to make up for a deficit when revenues do not cover spending.
    • The state credit rating is the grade given by a credit rating agency based on the general financial health of the state's government and economy.
    • State funds include general and other state-based funds. A general fund is "the predominant fund for financing a state's operations." Other state funds are "restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities."[4]
    • Federal funds are "funds received directly from the federal government."[4]
    • Total spending is calculated by adding together the totals for state and federal funds used for expenditures.

    Note: In comparing dollar amounts across the states, it is important to note that the cost of living can from state to state and within a state. The amounts given on this page have not been adjusted to reflect these differences. For more information on "regional price disparities" and the Consumer Price Index, see the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    Revenues

    2014 revenues

    See also: State government tax collections by source

    The table below breaks down state government tax collections by source in 2014 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "2013 population" and "Per capita collections" are rendered in thousands of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000). Figures in the columns labeled "2013 population" and "Per capita collections" have not been abbreviated.[5]

    Compared to neighboring states, North Dakota had the highest state tax collections per capita, at $8,270.

    State tax collections by source ($ in thousands), 2014
    State Property taxes Sales and gross receipts Licenses Income taxes Other taxes Total 2013 population Per capita collections
    North Dakota $3,026 $1,848,130 $227,245 $748,966 $3,293,068 $6,120,435 740,040 $8,270
    Minnesota $836,743 $9,759,346 $1,314,463 $10,844,216 $374,133 $23,128,901 5,457,125 $4,238
    Montana $268,508 $550,254 $314,271 $1,213,400 $309,120 $2,655,553 1,023,252 $2,595
    South Dakota N/A $1,296,748 $277,787 $24,819 $9,142 $1,608,496 853,304 $1,885
    United States $14,232,835 $411,414,175 $51,120,024 $357,104,785 $31,880,270 $865,752,089 318,907,401 $2,715
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "2014 annual survey of state government tax collections by category," accessed April 4, 2016
    North Dakota tax collections by source in 2014.
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau

    The table below lists 2014 tax collections by source as percentages of total collections. About 30.2 percent of North Dakota's total state tax collections came from sales taxes and gross receipts.[5]

    State tax collections by source (as percentages), 2014
    State Property taxes Sales and gross receipts Licenses Income taxes Other taxes
    North Dakota 0.0% 30.2% 3.7% 12.2% 53.8%
    Minnesota 3.6% 42.2% 5.7% 46.9% 1.6%
    Montana 10.1% 20.7% 11.8% 45.7% 11.6%
    South Dakota N/A 80.6% 17.3% 1.5% 0.6%
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "2014 annual survey of state government tax collections by category," accessed April 4, 2016

    Federal aid to the state budget

    See also: Federal aid to state budgets

    State governments receive aid from the federal government to fund a variety of joint programs, mainly in the form of grants for such things as Medicaid, education, and transportation. In 2013 federal aid to the states accounted for roughly 30 percent of all state general revenues. Federal aid varies from state to state. For example, Mississippi received approximately $7.5 billion in federal aid in 2013, accounting for about 43 percent of the state's general revenues, the highest percentage of all of the states. By contrast, North Dakota received about $1.5 billion in federal aid in 2013, or just 19 percent of the state's general revenues, the lowest percentage in the nation.[6]

    The table below notes what share of North Dakota’s general revenues came from the federal government in 2013. That year, North Dakota received approximately $1.5 billion in federal aid, 19.0 percent of the state's total general revenues. Taking into consideration the state's 2013 population, this came out to about $2,114 in federal aid per capita. Figures from surrounding states are provided for additional context.[7]

    Federal aid to state budgets, 2013
    State Total federal aid ($ in thousands) Federal aid as a % of general revenues Ranking (by % of general revenues) Est. 2013 population Aid per capita
    North Dakota $1,529,135 19.0% 50 723,393 $2,114
    Minnesota $9,141,995 26.4% 39 5,420,380 $1,687
    Montana $2,158,227 37.4% 6 1,015,165 $2,126
    South Dakota $1,575,212 39.0% 4 844,877 $1,864
    Sources: United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2013," accessed April 4, 2016
    United States Census Bureau, "State totals: Vintage 2013," accessed April 8, 2016
    Note: Per-capita figures were generated by Ballotpedia by dividing total federal aid for the state by the estimated population of that state in 2013.

    Spending

    Estimated 2015 expenditures

    See also: Total state expenditures

    The table below breaks down estimated spending totals for fiscal year 2015 (comparable figures from surrounding states are included to provide additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population” and “Per capita spending" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population” and “Per capita spending" have not been abbreviated.[2]

    North Dakota's total estimated government spending in fiscal year 2015 was $7.7 billion, which was the second highest amount when compared to surrounding states.

    Total estimated state spending, FY 2015 ($ in millions)
    State State funds Federal funds Total spending Population Per capita spending
    North Dakota $6,074 $1,674 $7,748 756,927 $10,236.13
    Minnesota $24,613 $10,601 $35,214 5,489,594 $6,414.68
    Montana $4,194 $2,189 $6,383 1,032,949 $6,179.40
    South Dakota $2,542 $1,347 $3,889 858,469 $4,530.16
    Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total spending and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census Bureau estimates.[8]
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers, "Examining fiscal 2013-2015 state spending," accessed April 4, 2016

    Spending by function

    Breakdown of spending by function in FY 2014.
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    See also: State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures

    State spending in North Dakota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2014 information is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.[2]

    In fiscal year 2014, transportation accounted for 19 percent of North Dakota's total expenditures.

    State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures, FY 2014
    State K-12 education Higher education Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Transportation Other
    North Dakota 15.8% 17.3% 0.1% 12.9% 1.6% 19.0% 33.4%
    Minnesota 28.2% 4.4% 1.5% 29.8% 1.5% 9.5% 25.1%
    Montana 15.7% 10.4% 0.5% 17.0% 3.2% 11.4% 41.9%
    South Dakota 14.0% 21.6% 0.7% 20.3% 2.7% 14.5% 26.3%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[2]

    Spending trends

    Between 2010 and 2014, the share of the North Dakota state budget spent on transportation increased from 11.3 percent in 2010 to 19 percent in 2014. See the table below for further details (figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category).[2][9][10]

    Spending by function from 2010 to 2014 (as percentages)
    Year K-12 education Higher education Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Transportation Other
    2014 15.8% 17.3% 0.1% 12.9% 1.6% 19.0% 33.4%
    2013 15% 19% 0.1% 13.7% 1.9% 16.1% 34.2%
    2012 13.8% 17.7% 0.1% 12.1% 1.9% 16.4% 38.0%
    2011 15.8% 20.6% 0.1% 14.3% 1.8% 12.4% 35.0%
    2010 16.6% 20.7% 0.2% 13.7% 1.8% 11.3% 35.8%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[2]

    Fiscal year budgets

    See also: Historical North Dakota budget and finance information

    Fiscal years 2016 and 2017

    DocumentIcon.jpg See budget bill: Legislative Appropriations 2015-2017 Biennium (overview document)

    Governor Jack Dalrymple proposed his budget for the 2016-2017 biennium on December 3, 2014. The proposal also outlined certain investments, including infrastructure improvements, that were intended to capitalize on the state's growing economy.[11]

    Governor Dalrymple signed the state's budget into law in April 2015. The state's total spending for the biennium was set at $14.2 billion, including a general fund budget of $6.02 billion. Investments in K-12 and pre-K education programs, as well as investments in infrastructure and transportation, were among the highlights of the budget.[11]

    State debt

    See also: State debt

    According to a January 2014 report by the nonprofit organization State Budget Solutions, North Dakota had a state debt of approximately $9.3 billion in 2014. Its state debt per capita was $13,241. In this report for fiscal year 2012, state debt was calculated based on four components: "market-valued unfunded public pension liabilities, outstanding government debt, unfunded other post employment benefit (OPEB) liabilities, and outstanding unemployment trust fund loans." The report revealed that altogether state governments faced a combined $5.1 trillion in debt, which amounted to $16,178 per capita in the nation.[12][13]

    Total 2012 state debt
    State Total state debt State debt per capita Per capita debt ranking
    North Dakota $9,263,742,000 $13,241 30
    Minnesota $85,879,526,000 $15,965 21
    Montana $15,769,183,000 $15,689 22
    South Dakota $7,707,458,000 $9,249 46
    Sources: State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014

    Taxpayer burden

    Tia logo.png

    TIA Methodology: To figure a state’s taxpayer burden or surplus, TIA looked at a state’s total reported assets minus capital assets and assets restricted by law (buildings, roads, land, etc.) to calculate “available assets,” which were then compared to the amount of money the state owes in bills, including retirement obligations such as pension plans and healthcare benefits for retirees.

    If the difference between available assets and total bills was positive, TIA called this a surplus; if it was negative, this was a burden. This amount was then divided by the number of individual tax returns with a positive tax liability, thus expressing the total state surplus or burden on a per-taxpayer basis.

    According to a report released in September 2015 by the nonprofit Truth in Accounting (TIA), North Dakota ranked 2nd best in the country in “taxpayer surplus.” Rather than using per capita state debt, TIA ranked states based on what it called a “taxpayer burden,” a term that reflects “the amount each taxpayer would have to send to their state’s treasury in order for the state to be debt-free.” On the other hand, states that had sufficient resources to pay their bills were said to have a “taxpayer surplus,” which represents the amount that each taxpayer would receive if the state were to disburse its excess funds.

    Based on analysis of North Dakota’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report from June 30, 2014, and actuarial reports for the state’s retirement plans, TIA concluded that $345.2 million in promised retirement benefits were unfunded, but only $872,000 of these liabilities were reported on North Dakota’s balance sheet. With all of the unfunded retirement benefits included in the total debt, the state had a surplus of $8.1 billion, or a taxpayer surplus of $28,400.[14]

    Public pensions

    See also: North Dakota public pensions and North Dakota public employee salaries

    Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, the funded ratio of North Dakota's state-administered pension plans decreased from 93.3 percent to 66.3 percent. The state paid 53 percent of its annual required contribution, and for fiscal year 2012 the pension system's unfunded accrued liability totaled $890.5 million. This amounted to $1,350 in unfunded liabilities per capita.[15][16]

    Credit ratings

    See also: State credit ratings

    Credit rating agencies, such as Standard and Poor's, assign grades to states that take into account a state's ability to pay debts and the general health of the state's economy. Generally speaking, a higher credit rating indicates lower interest costs on the general obligation bonds states sometimes sell to investors in order to finance large-scale undertakings (e.g., road construction and other public works projects). This in turn results in lower interest costs, thereby lowering the cost to taxpayers.[17][18]

    The table below lists the Standard and Poor's credit ratings for North Dakota and surrounding states from 2004 to 2014. Standard and Poor's grades range from AAA, the highest available, to BBB, the lowest.[19]

    State credit ratings, 2004 to 2014
    State 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
    North Dakota AAA AAA AA+ AA+ AA+ AA+ AA AA AA AA AA-
    Minnesota AA+ AA+ AA+ AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA
    Montana AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA- AA- AA- AA-
    South Dakota AA+ AA+ AA+ AA+ AA AA AA AA AA
    Source: Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014

    Economic indicators

    See also: Economic indicators by state
    North Dakota's GDP increased by 6.3 percent in 2014. Click the image to view a larger version.

    Broadly defined, a healthy economy is typically one that has a "stable and strong rate of economic growth" (gross state product, in this case) and low unemployment, among many other factors. The economic health of a state can significantly affect its healthcare costs, insurance coverage, access to care, and citizens' physical and mental health. For instance, during economic downturns, employers may reduce insurance coverage for employees, while those who are laid off may lose coverage altogether. Individuals also tend to spend less on non-urgent care or postpone visits to the doctor when times are hard. These changes in turn may affect the decisions made by policymakers as they react to shifts in the industry. Additionally, a person's socioeconomic status has profound effects on their access to care and the quality of care received.[20][21][22]

    In September 2014, North Dakota had the lowest unemployment rate in the country at 2.8 percent. Its median annual household income was $55,583, and most North Dakota residents earned incomes at least 400 percent of the federal poverty level.[23][24][25][26]

    Note: Gross state product (GSP) on its own is not necessarily an indicator of economic health; GSP may also be influenced by state population size. Many factors must be looked at together to assess state economic health.

    Various economic indicators by state
    State Distribution of population by FPL* (2013) Median annual income (2011-2013) Unemployment rate Total GSP (2013)
    Under 100% 100-199% 200-399% 400%+ Sept. 2013 Sept. 2014
    North Dakota 10% 17% 33% 40% $55,583 2.8% 2.8% $56,329
    Montana 15% 19% 35% 31% $43,924 5.6% 4.6% $44,040
    South Dakota 11% 17% 35% 37% $50,488 3.7% 3.4% $46,732
    Wyoming 12% 18% 31% 39% $56,569 4.6% 4.7% $45,432
    United States 15% 19% 30% 36% $52,047 7.2% 5.9% $16,701,415
    * Federal Poverty Level. "The U.S. Census Bureau's poverty threshold for a family with two adults and one child was $18,751 in 2013. This is the official measurement of poverty used by the Federal Government."
    Median annual household income, 2011-2013.
    In millions of current dollars. "Gross State Product is a measurement of a state's output; it is the sum of value added from all industries in the state."
    Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "State Health Facts"


    Budget process

    State documents and agencies
    Below are links to official North Dakota budget and financial documents. The first is the state's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). A CAFR is a detailed presentation of a government entity's financial condition. This includes fiscal activities and balances for a fiscal year. The second link is to the state's relevant budget agency or office.

    The state operates on a biennial budget cycle. The sequence of key events in the budget process is as follows:[27]

    1. Budget instructions are sent to state agencies between April and May of the year preceding the start of the new biennium.
    2. State agencies submit their budget requests to the governor between July and October.
    3. The governor submits his or her proposed budget to the state legislature in December.
    4. The legislature typically adopts a budget in April. A simple majority is required to pass a budget. The new biennium begins in July.

    North Dakota is one of 44 states in which the governor has line item veto authority.[27][28]

    The governor is constitutionally required to submit a balanced budget proposal. Likewise, the state legislature is required to pass a balanced budget.[27]

    Agencies, offices, and committees

    There are four major standing committees in the North Dakota Legislative Assembly that play a part in budget and financial matters: the North Dakota House Appropriations Committee, the North Dakota House Finance and Taxation Committee, the North Dakota Senate Appropriations Committee, and the North Dakota Senate Finance and Taxation Committee.[29][30]

    Transparency

    See also: "Following the Money" report, 2015

    The U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer-focused nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., released its annual report on state transparency websites in March 2015. The report, entitled "Following the Money," measured how transparent and accountable state websites were with regard to state government spending.[31] According to the report, North Dakota received a grade of D+ and a numerical score of 64, indicating that North Dakota was "Lagging" in terms of transparency regarding state spending.[31]

    As published 2015


    Budget Policy Logo on Ballotpedia.png

    State finances in the U.S.
    State tax policy in the U.S.
    Pension Policy

    Public Policy Logo-one line.png

    The information on this tab contains:

    • Spending (fiscal years 2013 and 2014)
    • Revenues (fiscal year 2013)
    • State debt (fiscal year 2012)
    • Federal aid to the state budget (fiscal year 2012)
    • Budget process

    Between fiscal years 2013 and 2014, total government spending in North Dakota increased by approximately $1.1 billion, from $5.7 billion in fiscal year 2013 to an estimated $6.8 billion in 2014. This represented an 18.8 percent increase. The cumulative rate of inflation during the same period was 1.58 percent, calculated using the Consumer Price Indices for January 2013 and January 2014. As of 2014, financial services firm Standard and Poor's had assigned North Dakota a credit rating of AAA.[32][33][34]

    HIGHLIGHTS
  • In fiscal year 2014, estimated per capita spending in North Dakota equaled $9,163, the fifth-highest in the nation.
  • Expenditures

    Definitions

    The following terms are used to describe a state's finances:

    • Revenues come mainly from tax collections, licensing fees, federal aid, and returns on investments.
    • Expenditures generally include spending on government salaries, infrastructure, education, public pensions, public assistance, corrections, Medicaid, and transportation.
    • State debt refers to the money borrowed to make up for a deficit when revenues do not cover spending.
    • The state credit rating is the grade given by a credit rating agency based on the general financial health of the state's government and economy.
    • State funds include general and other state-based funds. A general fund is "the predominant fund for financing a state's operations." Other state funds are "restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities."[4]
    • Federal funds are "funds received directly from the federal government."[4]
    • Total spending is calculated by adding together the totals for state and federal funds used for expenditures.

    2014 expenditures

    See also: Total state expenditures

    The table below breaks down estimated spending totals for fiscal year 2014 (comparable figures from surrounding states are included to provide additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population” and “Per capita spending" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population” and “Per capita spending" have not been abbreviated.[34]

    In North Dakota, total estimated spending in fiscal year 2014 equaled $6.8 billion.

    Total estimated state spending, FY 2014 ($ in millions)
    State State funds Federal funds Total spending Population Per capita spending
    North Dakota $5,186 $1,590 $6,776 739,482 $9,163.17
    Minnesota $25,861 $9,492 $35,353 5,457,173 $6,478.26
    Montana $4,039 $2,149 $6,188 1,023,579 $6,045.45
    South Dakota $2,669 $1,420 $4,089 853,175 $4,792.69
    Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total spending and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census Bureau estimates.[35]
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    Spending by function

    See also: State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures
    Breakdown of spending by function in FY 2013.
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    State spending in North Dakota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2013 information is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.[34]

    With the exception of spending that qualifies as "other," the largest portion of North Dakota's spending went to higher education.

    State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures, FY 2013
    State K-12 education Higher education Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Trans-
    portation
    Other
    North Dakota 15% 19% 0.1% 13.7% 1.9% 16.1% 34.2%
    Minnesota 29.2% 4.7% 1.4% 24.3% 1.5% 10.7% 28.2%
    Montana 15.5% 10.1% 0.5% 17.9% 3.2% 11% 41.8%
    South Dakota 14.1% 22.3% 0.7% 19.9% 2.5% 15% 25.5%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[34]

    Spending trends

    Between 2009 and 2013, the share of the North Dakota state budget spent on transportation increased from 11.7 percent to 16.1 percent. See the table below for further details (figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category).[34][9][10][36][37]

    Spending by function from 2009 to 2013 (as percentages)
    Year K-12 education Higher education Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Transportation Other
    2013 15% 19% 0.1% 13.7% 1.9% 16.1% 34.2%
    2012 13.8% 17.7% 0.1% 12.1% 1.9% 16.4% 38.0%
    2011 15.8% 20.6% 0.1% 14.3% 1.8% 12.4% 35.0%
    2010 16.6% 20.7% 0.2% 13.7% 1.8% 11.3% 35.8%
    2009 14.0% 22.7% 0.3% 14.1% 2.0% 11.7% 25.4%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[34]

    Revenues

    2013 revenues

    See also: State government tax collections by source

    The table below breaks down state government tax collections by source in 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context). Figures for all columns except "Population" and "Per capita revenue" are rendered in thousands of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000). Figures in the columns labeled "Population" and "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.[5]

    About $1.8 billion of North Dakota's total revenue in 2013 came from sales taxes and gross receipts. This accounted for about one-third of the state's total revenue for that year.

    State tax collections by source ($ in thousands)
    State Property taxes Sales and gross receipts Licenses Individual income taxes Corporation net income taxes Other taxes Total 2013 population Per capita collections
    North Dakota $2,808 $1,763,437 $207,482 $641,766 $225,719 $2,457,558 $5,298,770 723,857 $7,320.19
    Minnesota $821,799 $8,289,780 $1,184,465 $8,950,755 $1,363,128 $421,882 $21,031,809 5,422,060 $3,878.93
    Montana $262,313 $558,961 $320,858 $1,045,500 $170,999 $285,979 $2,644,610 1,014,864 $2,605.88
    South Dakota N/A $1,228,262 $257,220 N/A $37,172 $11,009 $1,533,663 845,510 $1,813.89
    Source: Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Sources 2000-2013," June 20, 2014
    North Dakota tax collections by source in 2013.
    Source: Tax Policy Center

    The table below lists 2013 tax collections by source as percentages of total collections. About 46 percent of North Dakota's total tax collections came from sources classified as "other."[5]

    State tax collections by source (as percentages)
    State Property taxes Sales and gross receipts Licenses Individual income taxes Corporation net income taxes Other taxes
    North Dakota 0.05% 33.28% 3.92% 12.11% 4.26% 46.38%
    Minnesota 3.91% 39.42% 5.63% 42.56% 6.48% 2.01%
    Montana 9.92% 21.14% 12.13% 39.53% 6.47% 10.81%
    South Dakota N/A 80.09% 16.77% N/A 2.42% 0.72%
    Source: Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Sources 2000-2013," June 20, 2014

    State debt

    See also: State debt

    According to a January 2014 report by the nonprofit organization State Budget Solutions, North Dakota had a state debt of approximately $9.3 billion in 2014. Its state debt per capita was $13,241. In this report for fiscal year 2012, state debt was calculated based on four components: "market-valued unfunded public pension liabilities, outstanding government debt, unfunded other post employment benefit (OPEB) liabilities, and outstanding unemployment trust fund loans." The report revealed that altogether state governments faced a combined $5.1 trillion in debt, which amounted to $16,178 per capita in the nation.[38][39]

    Total 2012 state debt
    State Total state debt State debt per capita Per capita debt ranking
    North Dakota $9,263,742,000 $13,241 30
    Minnesota $85,879,526,000 $15,965 21
    Montana $15,769,183,000 $15,689 22
    South Dakota $7,707,458,000 $9,249 46
    Sources: State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014

    Public pensions

    See also: North Dakota public pensions and North Dakota public employee salaries

    Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, the funded ratio of North Dakota's state-administered pension plans decreased from 93.3 percent to 66.3 percent. The state paid 53 percent of its annual required contribution, and for fiscal year 2012 the pension system's unfunded accrued liability totaled $890.5 million. This amounted to $1,350 in unfunded liabilities per capita.[15][40]

    Credit ratings

    See also: State credit ratings

    Credit rating agencies, such as Standard and Poor's, assign grades to states that take into account a state's ability to pay debts and the general health of the state's economy. Generally speaking, a higher credit rating indicates lower interest costs on the general obligation bonds states sometimes sell to investors in order to finance large-scale undertakings (e.g., road construction and other public works projects). This in turn results in lower interest costs, thereby lowering the cost to taxpayers.[17][41]

    The table below lists the Standard and Poor's credit ratings for North Dakota and surrounding states from 2004 to 2014. Standard and Poor's grades range from AAA, the highest available, to BBB, the lowest.[42]

    State credit ratings, 2004 to 2014
    State 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
    North Dakota AAA AAA AA+ AA+ AA+ AA+ AA AA AA AA AA-
    Minnesota AA+ AA+ AA+ AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA
    Montana AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA- AA- AA- AA-
    South Dakota AA+ AA+ AA+ AA+ AA AA AA AA AA
    Source: Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014

    Federal aid to the state budget

    See also: Federal aid to state budgets

    State governments receive aid from the federal government to fund a variety of joint programs, such as Medicaid. Federal aid varies from state to state. For example, Mississippi received approximately $7.7 billion in federal aid in 2012, which accounted for more than 45 percent of the state's general revenues. By contrast, Alaska received roughly $2.9 billion in federal aid in 2012, just under 20 percent of the state's general revenues.[7]

    The table below notes what share of North Dakota’s general revenues came from the federal government in 2012. That year, North Dakota received approximately $1.8 billion in federal aid, nearly 25 percent of the state's total general revenues. Figures from surrounding states are provided for additional context.[7]

    Federal aid to state budgets, 2012
    State Total federal aid ($ in thousands) Federal aid as a % of general revenue Ranking
    North Dakota $1,750,134 24.76% 45
    Minnesota $9,608,018 28.13% 39
    Montana $2,202,444 38.97% 6
    South Dakota $1,630,220 40.84% 4
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2012," accessed February 24, 2014

    Stimulus

    North Dakota received $1.10 billion in federal stimulus funding between February 2009 and June 2013.[43]

    Budget process

    The state operates on a biennial budget cycle. The sequence of key events in the budget process is as follows:[27]

    1. Budget instructions are sent to state agencies between April and May of the year preceding the start of the new biennium.
    2. State agencies submit their budget requests to the governor between July and October.
    3. The governor submits his or her proposed budget to the state legislature in December.
    4. The legislature typically adopts a budget in April. A simple majority is required to pass a budget. The new biennium begins in July.

    North Dakota is one of 44 states in which the governor has line item veto authority.[27][44]

    The governor is constitutionally required to submit a balanced budget proposal. Likewise, the state legislature is required to pass a balanced budget.[27]

    Agencies, offices, and committees

    There are four major standing committees in the North Dakota Legislative Assembly: the North Dakota House Appropriations Committee, the North Dakota House Finance and Taxation Committee, the North Dakota Senate Appropriations Committee and the North Dakota Senate Finance and Taxation Committee.[45][46]

    Studies and reports

    U.S. PIRG "Following the Money" report

    See also: "Following the Money" report, 2014

    The U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a consumer-focused nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., released its annual report on state transparency websites in April 2014. The report, entitled "Following the Money," measured the transparency and accountability of state websites with regard to state government spending.[47] According to the report, North Dakota received a grade of D and a numerical score of 56, indicating that North Dakota was lagging in terms of transparency regarding state spending.[47]

    As published 2014

    The information on this tab contains:

    • Spending (fiscal year 2013)
    • Spending by function (fiscal year 2012)
    • Spending trends (fiscal years 2008 to 2012)
    • Revenues (fiscal year 2013)
    • Historical spending (fiscal years 2009 to 2012)
    • Budget transparency

    Between fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2013, North Dakota's total expenditures increased by approximately $1.998 billion, from $3.941 billion in 2009 to $5.939 billion in 2013. This represented a 50.70 percent increase, outpacing the cumulative rate of inflation during the same period (9.06 percent, calculated using the Consumer Price Indices for January 2009 and January 2013).[48][49]

    Spending

    Definitions

    Although each state executes its budget process differently, the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) breaks down state expenditures into four general categories. This allows for comparisons among the 50 states. NASBO's categories are as follows:[50]

    • General fund: "The predominant fund for financing a state’s operations. Revenues are received from broad-based state taxes. However, there are differences in how specific functions are financed from state to state."[50]
    • Other funds: "Expenditures from revenue sources that are restricted by law for particular governmental functions or activities. For example, a gasoline tax dedicated to a highway trust fund would appear in the 'Other funds' column. For Medicaid, other state funds include provider taxes, fees, donations, assessments, and local funds."[50]
    • Federal funds: "Funds received directly from the federal government."[50]
    • Bonds: "Expenditures from the sale of bonds, generally for capital projects."[50]

    2013

    Breakdown of expenditures in FY 2013
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    The table below breaks down expenditures for fiscal year 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are provided to give additional context).[50] Figures for all columns except "Per capita expenditures" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita expenditures" have not been abbreviated.

    Total state expenditures, FY 2013 ($ in millions)[50]
    State General fund Federal funds Other funds Bonds Total Per capita expenditures
    North Dakota $2,220 $1,621 $2,072 $26 $5,939 $8,209.92
    Minnesota $20,056 $8,637 $6,263 $810 $35,766 $6,598.43
    Montana $1,947 $2,115 $1,978 $0 $6,040 $5,949.77
    South Dakota $1,302 $1,487 $1,307 $35 $4,131 $4,889.47
    Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total expenditures and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates.[51]
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    Spending by function

    2012

    Breakdown of expenditures by function in FY 2012
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    State expenditures in North Dakota can be further broken down by function (elementary and secondary education, public assistance, etc.). Fiscal year 2012 data is included in the table below (information from neighboring states is provided for additional context). Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

    Expenditures by function, FY 2012 (as percentages)[50]
    State Elementary and secondary ed. Higher ed. Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Transportation Other
    North Dakota 13.8% 17.7% 0.1% 12.1% 1.9% 16.4% 38.0%
    Minnesota 23.8% 9.7% 1.4% 27.6% 1.5% 8.3% 27.7%
    Montana 15.5% 9.8% 0.5% 16.8% 3.1% 12.7% 41.5%
    South Dakota 14.3% 17.7% 0.8% 20.9% 2.7% 15.9% 27.7%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[50]

    Spending trends

    From 2008 to 2012, higher education spending in North Dakota fell by nearly six percentage points, or 24.7 percent, as a share of the budget. During the same period, transportation expenditures rose by 4.40 percentage points, or 36.7 percent, as a share of the budget. The table below details changes in expenditures from 2008 to 2012.[50][9][10][36][37] Figures are rendered as percentages, indicating the share of the total budget spent per category.

    Expenditures from 2008 to 2012 (as percentages)
    Year K-12 education Higher education Public assistance Medicaid Corrections Transportation Other
    2012 13.8% 17.7% 0.1% 12.1% 1.9% 16.4% 38.0%
    2011 15.8% 20.6% 0.1% 14.3% 1.8% 12.4% 35.0%
    2010 16.6% 20.7% 0.2% 13.7% 1.8% 11.3% 35.8%
    2009 14.0% 22.7% 0.3% 14.1% 2.0% 11.7% 25.4%
    2008 14.5% 23.5% 0.3% 15.1% 2.0% 12.0% 32.6%
    Change in % -0.70% -5.80% -0.20% -3.00% -0.10% 4.40% 5.40%
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers
    Note: "Other" expenditures include "Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), institutional and community care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled, public health programs, employer contributions to pensions and health benefits, economic development, environmental projects, state police, parks and recreation, housing and general aid to local governments."[50]

    Revenues

    2013 revenues

    Breakdown of general fund revenue sources in FY 2013
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    The table below breaks down general fund revenues by source in fiscal year 2013 (comparable figures from surrounding states are also provided to give additional context).[50] Figures for all columns except "Per capita revenue" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.

    Revenue sources in the general fund, FY 2013 ($ in millions)[50]
    State Sales tax Personal income tax Corporate income tax Gaming tax Other taxes and fees Total Per capita revenue
    North Dakota $1,256 $596 $162 $5 $528 $2,547 $3,520.91
    Minnesota $4,817 $8,649 $1,165 $39 $2,786 $17,456 $3,220.44
    Montana $62 $1,048 $177 $57 $734 $2,078 $2,046.96
    South Dakota $776 $0 $0 $1 $587 $1,364 $1,614.44
    Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total revenues and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates for 2013.[51]
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    Revenue trends

    The table below details the change in revenue sources in the general fund from 2009 to 2013.[50][9] Figures for all columns except "Per capita revenue" are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000). Figures in the column labeled "Per capita revenue" have not been abbreviated.

    Revenue sources in the general fund, North Dakota ($ in millions)[50][9]
    Year Sales tax Personal income tax Corporate income tax Gaming tax Other taxes and fees Total Per capita revenue
    2013 $1,256 $596 $162 $5 $528 $2,547 $3,520.91
    2012 $1,154 $430 $199 $6 $731 $2,520 $3,593.10
    2011 $782 $428 $147 $8 $342 $1,707 $2,492.45
    2010 $610 $302 $88 $8 $529 $1,536 $2,277.77
    2009 $622 $375 $99 $10 $248 $1,354 $2,093.24
    Change in % 101.93% 58.93% 63.64% -50.00% 112.90% 88.11% 68.20%
    Per-capita figures are calculated by taking the state's total revenues and dividing by the number of state residents according to United States Census estimates.[51][52]
    Source: National Association of State Budget Officers

    Historical spending

    The information on state budget historical spending below was compiled by the National Association of State Budget Officers. Figures reflect the reported "Total Expenditures" in Table 1. Figures for all columns are rendered in millions of dollars (for example, $2,448 translates to $2,448,000,000).[50][10]

    Historical state spending in North Dakota ($ in millions)
    Fiscal year General Fund Other funds Federal funds Bonds Budget totals
    Total % of Budget Total % of Budget Total % of Budget Total % of Budget
    2011-2012 $2,222 37% $1,910 32% $1,884 31% $11 0% $6,027
    2010-2011 $1,615 32% $1,568 31% $1,813 36% $21 0% $5,017
    2009-2010 $1,595 33% $1,394 29% $1,857 38% $20 0% $4,866
    Averages: $1,811 34% $1,624 31% $1,851 35% $17 0% $5,303

    Budget transparency

    Transparency evaluation
    OMB Transparency
    Searchability N
    600px-Red x.png
    Grants N
    600px-Red x.png
    Contracts N
    600px-Red x.png
    Line item expenditures Y
    600px-Yes check.png
    Dept./agency budgets Y
    600px-Yes check.png
    Public employee salaries PPartial.png
    Last evaluation date unknown.
    See also: Evaluation of North Dakota state website and Constitutional provisions regarding reading of bills

    Legislation was passed in May 2009 (Senate Bill 2018) that mandated the creation of a statewide spending database. The database was set to be completed by June 30, 2011.[53]

    The table to the right is helpful in evaluating the level of transparency provided by the state's spending website.

    Independent transparency sites

    The North Dakota Policy Council sponsors a website on school transparency.[54]

    Multi-measure budget transparency profile

    The Institute of Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois created a multi-measure transparency profile for North Dakota, which measured state transparency as of September 2011 using indicators from a range of organizations. These indicators measured both website transparency and other recognized facets of governmental transparency. In addition, IGPA presented four unique indicators of non-transparency based on the observation that transfers or reassignments between general and special funds can obscure the true fiscal condition of a state.[55][56]

    IGPA devised a budget transparency index based on information available from the National Association of State Budget Officers. North Dakota tied for 33rd in the nation with 12 other states, earning four out of eight possible points.[56]

    North Dakota - IGPA score for budget process, contents and disclosure
    Budget transparency indicator Yes or no?
    Performance measures
    {{{1}}}
    "Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" budget N
    600px-Red x.png
    Multi-year forecasting N
    600px-Red x.png
    Annual cycle N
    600px-Red x.png
    Binding revenue forecast
    {{{1}}}
    Legislative revenue forecast
    {{{1}}}
    Nonpartisan staff Y
    600px-Yes check.png
    Constitution or statutory tax/spend limitations N
    600px-Red x.png
    TOTAL 4

    In addition to the individual state profile, IGPA offers a 50-state comparison and profiles for other states.[56]

    Prior fiscal year budgets

    Fiscal years 2016 and 2017

    DocumentIcon.jpg See budget bill: Legislative Appropriations 2015-2017 Biennium (overview document)

    Governor Jack Dalrymple proposed his budget for the 2016-2017 biennium on December 3, 2014. The proposal also outlined certain investments, including infrastructure improvements, that were intended to capitalize on the state's growing economy.[11]

    Governor Dalrymple signed the state's budget into law in April 2015. The state's total spending for the biennium was set at $14.2 billion, including a general fund budget of $6.02 billion. Investments in K-12 and pre-K education programs, as well as investments in infrastructure and transportation, were among the highlights of the budget.[11]

    Fiscal years 2014 and 2015

    DocumentIcon.jpg See budget bill: Legislative Appropriations 2013-15 Biennium (overview document)

    North Dakota does not pass a single, all-encompassing appropriation bill, but rather several appropriation bills that together comprise the biennial budget. For a detailed overview of the 2013-2015 biennial budget, click here.[57][58]

    Fiscal years 2012 and 2013

    See also: North Dakota state budget (2011-2013)

    Fiscal year 2011

    See also: North Dakota state budget (2010-2011)

    Fiscal year 2010

    See also: North Dakota state budget (2009-2010)

    See also

    Footnotes

    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "CPI Detailed Report Data for February 2015," accessed April 4, 2016
    2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 National Association of State Budget Officers, "Examining fiscal 2013-2015 state spending," accessed April 4, 2016 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nasbo2015" defined multiple times with different content
    3. InflationData.com, "Cumulative Inflation Calculator," accessed April 4, 2016. The cumulative rate of inflation during the same period declined -0.1 percent, calculated using the Consumer Price Indices for January 2014 and January 2015.
    4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report: 2013-2015," accessed April 7, 2016
    5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 U.S. Census Bureau, "2014 annual survey of state government tax collections by category," accessed April 4, 2016 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "taxcollections" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "taxcollections" defined multiple times with different content
    6. United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2013," accessed March 21, 2016
    7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 United States Census Bureau, "State Government Finances: 2012," accessed February 24, 2014
    8. United States Census Bureau, "State and County QuickFacts," accessed April 4, 2016
    9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report, 2009-2011," accessed February 24, 2014
    10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditures Report, 2010-2012," accessed February 24, 2014
    11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 National Association of State Budget Officers, "Summaries of Fiscal Year 2016 Proposed and Enacted Budgets," accessed September 22, 2015
    12. State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014
    13. In 2016, State Budget Solutions was absorbed by the American Legislative Exchange Council.
    14. Truth in Accounting, "Financial State of the States," September 2015
    15. 15.0 15.1 Morningstar, "The State of State Pension Plans 2013: A Deep Dive Into Shortfalls and Surpluses," accessed September 16, 2013
    16. The Pew Charitable Trusts, “The Fiscal Health of State Pension Plans: Funding Gap Continues to Grow,” accessed April 16, 2015
    17. 17.0 17.1 Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2012," July 13, 2012
    18. Bankrate, "The 6 states with the worst credit ratings," September 27, 2012
    19. Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014
    20. Academy Health, "Impact of the Economy on Health Care," August 2009
    21. The Conversation, "Budget explainer: What do key economic indicators tell us about the state of the economy?" May 6, 2015
    22. Health Affairs, "Socioeconomic Disparities In Health: Pathways And Policies," accessed July 13, 2015
    23. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Distribution of Total Population by Federal Poverty Level," accessed July 17, 2015
    24. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Median Annual Household Income," accessed July 17, 2015
    25. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Unemployment Rate (Seasonally Adjusted)," accessed July 17, 2015
    26. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Total Gross State Product (GSP) (millions of current dollars)," accessed July 17, 2015
    27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 National Association of State Budget Officers, "Budget Processes in the States, Spring 2021," accessed January 24, 2023
    28. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Separation of Powers: Executive Veto Powers," accessed January 26, 2024
    29. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, "House standing committees," accessed March 10, 2015
    30. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, "Senate standing committees," accessed March 10, 2015
    31. 31.0 31.1 U.S. Public Interest Research Group, "Following the Money 2015 Report," accessed April 4, 2016
    32. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "CPI Detailed Report Data for February 2014," accessed April 9, 2014
    33. InflationData.com, "Cumulative Inflation Calculator," February 28, 2014
    34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.4 34.5 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report: 2012-2014," accessed February 18, 2015
    35. United States Census Bureau, "State and County QuickFacts," accessed February 23, 2014
    36. 36.0 36.1 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report, 2009," accessed February 24, 2014
    37. 37.0 37.1 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report, 2008," accessed February 24, 2014
    38. State Budget Solutions, "State Budget Solutions' Fourth Annual State Debt Report," January 8, 2014
    39. In 2016, State Budget Solutions was absorbed by the American Legislative Exchange Council.
    40. The Pew Charitable Trusts, “The Fiscal Health of State Pension Plans: Funding Gap Continues to Grow,” accessed April 16, 2015
    41. Bankrate, "The 6 states with the worst credit ratings," September 27, 2012
    42. Stateline: The Daily News Service of The Pew Charitable Trusts, "Infographic: S&P State Credit Ratings, 2001-2014," June 9, 2014
    43. Recovery.gov, "Stimulus Spending by State," accessed February 21, 2014
    44. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Separation of Powers: Executive Veto Powers," accessed January 26, 2024
    45. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, "House standing committees," accessed March 10, 2015
    46. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, "Senate standing committees," accessed March 10, 2015
    47. 47.0 47.1 U.S. Public Interest Research Group, "Following the Money 2014 Report," accessed April 15, 2014
    48. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "CPI Detailed Report Data for February 2014," accessed April 9, 2014
    49. InflationData.com, "Cumulative Inflation Calculator," February 28, 2014
    50. 50.00 50.01 50.02 50.03 50.04 50.05 50.06 50.07 50.08 50.09 50.10 50.11 50.12 50.13 50.14 50.15 National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report, 2011-2013," accessed February 21, 2014
    51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 United States Census Bureau, "Annual Estimates of the Resident Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013," accessed February 26, 2014
    52. United States Census Bureau, "Vintage 2009: Annual Population Estimates," accessed February 26, 2014
    53. North Dakota Policy Council, "State to post expenditures online," May 10, 2009
    54. Sunshine on Schools, "Home page," accessed April 28, 2014
    55. Institute of Government and Public Affairs at University of Illinois, "Home page," accessed February 21, 2014
    56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 Institute of Government and Public Affairs at University of Illinois, "Budget Transparency Profiles - All 50 States," September 2011
    57. North Dakota Legislative Council, "North Dakota's Budgeting Process," December 7, 2012
    58. State of North Dakota, "Legislative Appropriations 2013-15 Biennium," accessed April 28, 2014