History of initiative and referendum in the U.S.
| Ballot basics |
|---|
| Ballot measure history |
| U.S. history |
| State histories |
As American politics became more democratic in the 19th and 20th centuries, initiatives and referendums became increasingly common tools used by citizens in exercising their political voice.
| Adapted from: |
| The Initiative and Referendum Almanac |
| M. Dane Waters |
| HIGHLIGHTS | |
Historical foundations of initiative and referendum
The use of the initiative and referendum (I&R) process has ebbed and flowed throughout U.S. history. Initiatives and referendums, which come from a variety of ideologies, can enact changes within governments at the local, state and national levels.
Various forms of I&R have existed in the United States since the 17th century, beginning in New England, where ordinances and other issues were listed on town hall meeting agendas. The voting within these town hall meetings established a precedent for the legislative referendum process, which allows citizens to ratify laws and amendments proposed by their elected officials.
Legislative referendum was proposed by Thomas Jefferson in 1775, for Virginia's state constitution. He believed that citizens were capable of being leaders and that they should agree upon, and approve, changes to laws.
Legislative referendum was not added to Virginia’s state constitution. Jefferson was unable to advocate for the process because he was at the Continental Congress.[1]
One year after legislative referendum was proposed to Virginia delegates, Georgia’s delegates gathered in Savannah to draft a new state constitution. An addition was suggested: Amendments could be added to the constitution once a petition signed by the majority of voters in each county called for a convention.
Though the process was never used and was ultimately deleted from the constitution, Georgia delegates were the first to conceive of a referendum process for state citizens.[1]
In an essay, "Federalist No. 49," James Madison wrote:
| “ | As the people are the only legitimate fountain of power, and it is from them that the constitutional charter, under which the several branches of government hold their power, is derived, it seems strictly consonant to the republican theory to recur to the same original authority ... whenever it may be necessary to enlarge, diminish, or new-model the powers of government.[2] | ” |
| —James Madison | ||
Massachusetts was the first state to hold a statewide legislative referendum; citizens ratified the state constitution in 1778. New Hampshire followed in 1792.[1] Other early adopters of the referendum process were Connecticut (1818), Maine (1819), New York (1820) and Rhode Island (1824).[1]
Congress eventually made the process of legislative referendum mandatory for all states entering the union after 1857.[1] Today, legislative referendum is exercised in every state.
The populist and progressive eras
By the late 19th century, many citizens wanted to increase their check on representative government. Members of the populist and progressive movements were dissatisfied with the government; they felt that wealthy special interest groups controlled the government and that citizens had no power to break this control.
A comprehensive platform of political reforms was proposed that included women’s suffrage, secret ballots, direct election of senators, recall elections and primary elections. The initiative process, which was the cornerstone of the reform package, was included as well. Without it, activists believed that many of the reforms they wanted (which were being blocked by state legislatures) would not be realized.
The theory of the initiative process was that the individual was capable of enhancing the representative government. The populists—who believed citizens should rule the elected and not allow the elected to rule the people—and the progressives took advantage of methods that were already in place for amending state constitutions, and they began pushing state legislators to add an amendment that would allow for an initiative and popular referendum process.
In 1897, Nebraska became the first state to allow cities to place initiative and referendum in their charters. One year later, citizens in South Dakota copied the initiative and referendum provisions from the 1848 Swiss Constitution and successfully amended them into their state’s constitution. South Dakota became the first state to adopt the statewide initiative and popular referendum process in 1898. Utah followed in 1900. Oregon voters approved the initiative and referendum amendment by an 11-to-1 margin in 1902.
Other states soon followed. Montana voters approved an initiative and popular referendum amendment proposed by the state legislature in 1906. One year later, Oklahoma became the first state to include the initiative and popular referendum in its original constitution. Maine and Michigan passed initiative and popular referendum amendments in 1908, and California placed initiative and popular referendum in its constitution in 1911.
Votes on adopting the initiative process
Constitutional amendments
The table below lists constitutional amendments to establish state initiative and referendum processes in the United States:
Advisory questions
The table below lists non-binding questions about establishing initiative and referendum processes:
| State | Year | Measure | Origin | Yes | No | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | 1996 | Initiative Process Advisory Question | Legislature | 53.14% | 46.86% | |
| Illinois | 1910 | Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | Initiative | 77.72% | 22.28% | |
| Delaware | 1906 | Initiative and Referendum Advisory Question | Legislature | 88.86% | 11.14% | |
| Illinois | 1902 | Local Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | Initiative | 82.42% | 17.58% | |
| Illinois | 1902 | State Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory Question | Initiative | 83.02% | 16.98% |
Footnotes
All the statistical data and information, unless otherwise noted, was gathered from Citizen Lawmakers (Temple University Press) or independently gathered by the Initiative & Referendum Institute.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Schmidt, D. (1985). Citizen Lawmakers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 In Minnesota, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.
- ↑ In Mississippi, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.
- ↑ In Wyoming, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.