Public policy made simple. Dive into our information hub today!

History of initiative and referendum in the U.S.

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballot basics
Vote Poster.jpg
Ballot measure history
U.S. history
State histories

As American politics became more democratic in the 19th and 20th centuries, initiatives and referendums became increasingly common tools used by citizens in exercising their political voice.

Adapted from:
IR Alamanac.jpg
The Initiative and Referendum Almanac
M. Dane Waters
HIGHLIGHTS
  • In 17th-century New England, ordinances and other laws were listed on town hall meeting agendas.
  • Massachusetts was the first state to hold a statewide legislative referendum in 1778.
  • The most recent state to add the initiative process to its constitution was Mississippi in 1992.
  • Historical foundations of initiative and referendum

    The use of the initiative and referendum (I&R) process has ebbed and flowed throughout U.S. history. Initiatives and referendums, which come from a variety of ideologies, can enact changes within governments at the local, state and national levels.

    Various forms of I&R have existed in the United States since the 17th century, beginning in New England, where ordinances and other issues were listed on town hall meeting agendas. The voting within these town hall meetings established a precedent for the legislative referendum process, which allows citizens to ratify laws and amendments proposed by their elected officials.

    Legislative referendum was proposed by Thomas Jefferson in 1775, for Virginia's state constitution. He believed that citizens were capable of being leaders and that they should agree upon, and approve, changes to laws.

    Legislative referendum was not added to Virginia’s state constitution. Jefferson was unable to advocate for the process because he was at the Continental Congress.[1]

    One year after legislative referendum was proposed to Virginia delegates, Georgia’s delegates gathered in Savannah to draft a new state constitution. An addition was suggested: Amendments could be added to the constitution once a petition signed by the majority of voters in each county called for a convention.

    Though the process was never used and was ultimately deleted from the constitution, Georgia delegates were the first to conceive of a referendum process for state citizens.[1]

    In an essay, "Federalist No. 49," James Madison wrote:

    As the people are the only legitimate fountain of power, and it is from them that the constitutional charter, under which the several branches of government hold their power, is derived, it seems strictly consonant to the republican theory to recur to the same original authority ... whenever it may be necessary to enlarge, diminish, or new-model the powers of government.[2]
    —James Madison

    Massachusetts was the first state to hold a statewide legislative referendum; citizens ratified the state constitution in 1778. New Hampshire followed in 1792.[1] Other early adopters of the referendum process were Connecticut (1818), Maine (1819), New York (1820) and Rhode Island (1824).[1]

    James Madison

    Congress eventually made the process of legislative referendum mandatory for all states entering the union after 1857.[1] Today, legislative referendum is exercised in every state.

    The populist and progressive eras

    By the late 19th century, many citizens wanted to increase their check on representative government. Members of the populist and progressive movements were dissatisfied with the government; they felt that wealthy special interest groups controlled the government and that citizens had no power to break this control.

    A comprehensive platform of political reforms was proposed that included women’s suffrage, secret ballots, direct election of senators, recall elections and primary elections. The initiative process, which was the cornerstone of the reform package, was included as well. Without it, activists believed that many of the reforms they wanted (which were being blocked by state legislatures) would not be realized.

    The theory of the initiative process was that the individual was capable of enhancing the representative government. The populists—who believed citizens should rule the elected and not allow the elected to rule the people—and the progressives took advantage of methods that were already in place for amending state constitutions, and they began pushing state legislators to add an amendment that would allow for an initiative and popular referendum process.

    In 1897, Nebraska became the first state to allow cities to place initiative and referendum in their charters. One year later, citizens in South Dakota copied the initiative and referendum provisions from the 1848 Swiss Constitution and successfully amended them into their state’s constitution. South Dakota became the first state to adopt the statewide initiative and popular referendum process in 1898. Utah followed in 1900. Oregon voters approved the initiative and referendum amendment by an 11-to-1 margin in 1902.

    Other states soon followed. Montana voters approved an initiative and popular referendum amendment proposed by the state legislature in 1906. One year later, Oklahoma became the first state to include the initiative and popular referendum in its original constitution. Maine and Michigan passed initiative and popular referendum amendments in 1908, and California placed initiative and popular referendum in its constitution in 1911.

    Votes on adopting the initiative process

    See also: History of ballot measures to establish initiative and referendum processes

    Constitutional amendments

    The table below lists constitutional amendments to establish state initiative and referendum processes in the United States:

    Constitutional amendments to establish initiative and referendum processes
    StateYearMeasureOriginYesNoOutcome
    Mississippi1992Amendment 8: Initiated Constitutional Amendments MeasureLegislature70.22%29.78%
    Approveda
    Rhode Island1986Question 5: Citizen-Initiated Ballot Measure Process and Nonpartisan Constitutional Convention Candidates AmendmentLegislature48.14%51.86%
    Defeatedd
    Minnesota1980Amendment 5: Initiative and Referendum Measure[3]Legislature53.19%46.81%
    Defeatedd
    South Dakota1972Amendment E: Initiated Constitutional Amendment and Constitution Revision MeasureLegislature67.14%32.86%
    Approveda
    Illinois1970Constitution Revision MeasureConvention57.25%42.75%
    Approveda
    Florida1968Amendment 1: Constitution Ratification MeasureLegislature55.42%44.58%
    Approveda
    Wyoming1968Amendment 2: Initiative and Referendum Process MeasureLegislature74.77%25.23%
    Approveda
    Alaska1956Proposition 1: Constitution Ratification MeasureConvention68.12%31.88%
    Approveda
    Massachusetts1918Question 1: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentConvention51.28%48.72%
    Approveda
    Minnesota1916Amendment 7: Initiative and Referendum Measure[3]Legislature78.46%21.54%
    Defeatedd
    Maryland1915Amendment 4: Veto Referendum Process AmendmentLegislature76.78%23.22%
    Approveda
    Minnesota1914Amendment 1: Initiative and Referendum Measure[3]Legislature80.16%19.84%
    Defeatedd
    Mississippi1914Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature68.68%31.32%
    Approveda
    North Dakota1914Initiated Constitutional Amendments MeasureLegislature66.40%33.60%
    Approveda
    North Dakota1914Initiated State Statutes and Referendums MeasureLegislature70.96%29.04%
    Approveda
    Texas1914Proposition 1: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature48.29%51.71%
    Defeatedd
    Wisconsin1914Question 8: Initiated Constitutional Amendments MeasureLegislature36.38%63.62%
    Defeatedd
    Wisconsin1914Question 2: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature31.30%68.70%
    Defeatedd
    Idaho1912SJR 12: Veto Referendum Process AmendmentLegislature76.39%23.61%
    Approveda
    Idaho1912SJR 13: Initiative Process AmendmentLegislature71.92%28.08%
    Approveda
    Mississippi1912Initiative and Referendum Amendment[4]Legislature65.27%34.73%
    Defeatedd
    Nebraska1912Amendment 1: Initiative and Referendum MeasureLegislature92.51%7.49%
    Approveda
    Nevada1912Question 3: Initiative Process AmendmentLegislature90.65%9.35%
    Approveda
    Ohio1912Initiative and Referendum AmendmentConvention57.47%42.53%
    Approveda
    Washington1912Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature71.49%28.51%
    Approveda
    Wyoming1912Initiative and Referendum Measure[5]Legislature85.66%14.34%
    Defeatedd
    Arizona1911Constitution Ratification Measure (Version 2)Convention88.79%11.21%
    Approveda
    Arizona1911Constitution Ratification Measure (Version 1)Convention78.68%21.32%
    Approveda
    California1911Proposition 7: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature76.41%23.59%
    Approveda
    New Mexico1911Constitution Ratification MeasureConvention70.32%29.68%
    Approveda
    Arkansas1910Amendment 10: Initiative and Referendum MeasureLegislature70.59%29.41%
    Approveda
    Colorado1910Referendum 3: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature76.95%23.05%
    Approveda
    Maine1908Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature68.67%31.33%
    Approveda
    Michigan1908Constitution Ratification MeasureConvention65.17%34.83%
    Approveda
    Missouri1908Amendment 3: Initiative and Referendum MeasureLegislature54.67%45.33%
    Approveda
    Oklahoma1907State Constitution Ratification MeasureConvention71.17%28.83%
    Approveda
    Montana1906Amendment 1: Initiative and Referendum MeasureLegislature84.61%15.39%
    Approveda
    Missouri1904Amendment 2: Initiative and Referendum MeasureLegislature40.61%59.39%
    Defeatedd
    Nevada1904Question 1: Veto Referendum Process AmendmentLegislature84.72%15.28%
    Approveda
    Oregon1902Measure Nos. 105-106: Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature91.63%8.37%
    Approveda
    Utah1900Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature71.17%28.83%
    Approveda
    South Dakota1898Initiative and Referendum AmendmentLegislature59.10%40.90%
    Approveda
    Average   68.28%31.72% 

    Advisory questions

    The table below lists non-binding questions about establishing initiative and referendum processes:

    Advisory questions about establishing initiative and referendum processes
    StateYearMeasureOriginYesNoOutcome
    Rhode Island1996Initiative Process Advisory QuestionLegislature53.14%46.86%
    Approveda
    Illinois1910Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory QuestionInitiative77.72%22.28%
    Approveda
    Delaware1906Initiative and Referendum Advisory QuestionLegislature88.86%11.14%
    Approveda
    Illinois1902Local Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory QuestionInitiative82.42%17.58%
    Approveda
    Illinois1902State Initiative and Referendum Process Advisory QuestionInitiative83.02%16.98%
    Approveda

    Footnotes

    All the statistical data and information, unless otherwise noted, was gathered from Citizen Lawmakers (Temple University Press) or independently gathered by the Initiative & Referendum Institute.

    1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Schmidt, D. (1985). Citizen Lawmakers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 In Minnesota, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.
    4. In Mississippi, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.
    5. In Wyoming, the constitutional amendment needed to receive approval from a majority of all ballots cast in the election, not just a majority of the votes specifically cast on the amendment.