Huntington Beach, California, Measure 1, Voter ID and Election Rules Amendment (March 2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Huntington Beach Measure 1

Flag of California.png

Election date

March 5, 2024

Topic
Local charter amendments and Local election administration and governance
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral

Huntington Beach Measure 1 was on the ballot as a referral in Huntington Beach on March 5, 2024. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported this charter amendment to:

  • authorize the City of Huntington Beach to require voter identification for elections;
  • provide for at least 20 ADA-compliant in-person voting locations within Huntington Beach;
  • provide that ballot dropboxes are to be monitored for compliance;
  • define an elector as a citizen of the U.S., a resident of Huntington Beach, and at least 18 years old; and
  • state that, in the event of a conflict between the Huntington Beach Charter and California Election Code, the Charter shall prevail.

A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment.


A simple majority was required for the approval of Measure 1.

Aftermath

Senate Bill 1174 (2024)

On September 29, 2024, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed Senate Bill 1174 (SB 1174), which prohibited local governments from passing laws to require people to present identification to vote.[1]

In the California State Legislature, Democrats supported SB 1174, and Republicans voted against the bill.[1]

California v. Huntington Beach

On November 3, 2025, the California Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled that the provision of Measure 1 requiring voter ID violated state election law.[2] The ruling stated, "In recent years, a vigorous nationwide debate has arisen over whether voters should be required to present identification at the polls to vote. We are not called upon to resolve this debate. Instead, this case presents us a much narrower, simpler question: Is voter identification a matter of 'integrity of the electoral process,' which our Supreme Court has held is a matter of statewide concern, whether presented in statewide or local elections? We conclude it is, and that as a result [SB 1174] preempts section 705, subdivision (a)(2) of the Huntington Beach City Charter, which purports to permit Huntington Beach to require voters to present identification to vote in municipal elections."[3] The California Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal on January 28, 2026.[4]

Earlier, on April 15, 2024, Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) filed litigation against Huntington Beach over Measure 1 in the Orange County Superior Court. He said, "The right to freely cast your vote is the foundation of our democracy and Huntington Beach’s voter ID policy flies in the face of this principle."[5] Bonta also wrote that state law preempted Measure 1. He stated, "[Measure 1] purports to authorize the City to demand supplemental documentation from registered voters before they cast a ballot, usurping the Legislature’s exclusive authority over voter registration, placing the onus on registered voters to establish their eligibility to vote, and groundlessly challenging the right to vote. This additional burden on voters cannot be reconciled with state law."[6]

Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates responded, "The people of Huntington Beach have made their voices clear on this issue and the people's decision on the March 5th ballot measures for election integrity is final. To that end, the city will vigorously uphold and defend the will of the people."[5]

On November 15, 2024, Superior Court Judge Nico Dourbetas ruled against California, stating that Huntington Beach could implement the ballot measure.[7] After the superior court denied the petition for a writ of mandate, Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber (D) appealed the decision to the California Fourth District Court of Appeal.[8]

Election results

Huntington Beach Measure 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

32,892 53.40%
No 28,701 46.60%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Measure 1 was as follows:

Shall proposed Charter Amendment No. 1, which provides that commencing in 2026, for all municipal elections, the City: may require Voter Identification for elections; provide more in-person voting locations; and monitor ballot drop-boxes, be approved?


Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • Mayor Tony Strickland (R): "Our democracy does not work if people do not have faith in the election results. Anytime you can put safeguards in I think it’s important to do so people have faith in our election outcomes."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • ACLU of Southern California
  • Disability Rights California

Arguments

  • Secretary of State Shirley Weber (D): "We cannot turn back the clock on voting rights. Voter ID requirements at the polls have historically been used to turn eligible voters away from exercising the franchise, especially low-income voters and voters of color. Not only is the action unlawful, it is also unnecessary because California already has guardrails in place for establishing both eligibility of each voter and for confirming their identity when returning their ballot."
  • Councilmember Natalie Moser: "We’re not improving people’s vision of this safe election. We are not doing that. It’s the exact opposite; we are sowing chaos in our elections. I trust the elections right now. I will not trust them under these circumstances."
  • ACLU of Southern California and Disability Rights California: "We have serious concerns about the legality and negative implications of the proposal to add Section 705 to the city charter relating to municipal elections (“proposed charter amendment”). Section 705’s voter identification (“voter ID”) provision violates state law. What's more, the voter ID, drop box monitoring, and voting location provisions will likely result in voter suppression. We urge you to reject the proposed charter amendment to avoid voter disenfranchisement and to avoid the waste of taxpayer resources on an election, implementation, and unnecessary litigation."


Background

Letter from Attorney General Bonta and Secretary of State Weber

On September 28, 2023, Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) and Secretary of State Shirley Weber (D) sent a letter to the City of Huntington Beach. The letter said that the proposed charter amendment requiring voter identification at the polls in municipal elections would conflict with state law and suppress voter participation without a discernible local benefit.[9] Attorney General Bonta stated, "Huntington Beach’s proposed amendment violates state law and would impose additional barriers to voting. If the city moves forward and places it on the ballot, we stand ready to take appropriate action to ensure that voters’ rights are protected."[10]

Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates responded to the letter, saying, "The letter reads largely as a policy concern and it does keep talking about how these issues are a matter of statewide concern for the state. I think it’s a stretch to say that voter ID in Huntington Beach and monitoring of ballot boxes is a statewide concern."[11]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

On October 5, 2023, the Huntington Beach City Council voted 4-3 to refer the charter amendment to the ballot.[12]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in California

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in California.

How to vote in California

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 California State Legislature, "Senate Bill 1174," accessed October 1, 2024
  2. Associated Press, "Huntington Beach voter ID measure violates California law, appeals court says," November 3, 2025
  3. California Fourth District Court of Appeal, "California v. Huntington Beach," November 3, 2025
  4. The Los Angeles Times, "California Supreme Court shoots down Huntington Beach’s voter ID law," January 29, 2026
  5. 5.0 5.1 Courthouse News, "California sues Huntington Beach over voter ID referendum," April 15, 2024
  6. Orange County Superior Court, "California v. Huntington Beach," April 15, 2024
  7. Fox 11 Los Angeles, "Judge dismisses state's lawsuit challenging Huntington Beach's Voter ID law," November 15, 2024
  8. California Attorney General, "Attorney General Bonta and Secretary of State Weber Continue Challenge to Huntington Beach Voter ID Law," May 28, 2025
  9. California Attorney General, "Re: Proposed Charter Amendments Requiring Voter Identification at the Polls and Monitoring of Ballot Drop Boxes in Municipal Elections," September 28, 2023
  10. California Attorney General, "Attorney General Bonta, Secretary of State Weber Warn City of Huntington Beach: Proposed Municipal Voter ID Amendment Violates California Law," September 28, 2023
  11. Voice of OC, "California Attorney General Warns Huntington Beach Against Implementing Voter ID Law," September 28, 2023
  12. Courthouse News, "Huntington Beach City Council votes to add voter ID charter amendment to March ballot," October 5, 2023
  13. California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed October 29, 2025
  14. California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed October 29, 2025
  15. 15.0 15.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed October 29, 2025
  16. California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed October 29, 2025
  17. SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
  18. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  19. Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024
  20. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025
  21. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.