Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al. (1987)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al.
Term: 1986
Important Dates
Argued: November 10, 1986
Decided: June 8, 1987
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Sandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaByron White
Concurring
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood MarshallJohn Paul Stevens

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 8, 1987. The case was argued before the court on November 10, 1986.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures
  • Petitioner: Interstate Commerce Commission
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Union, labor organization, or official of
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 482 U.S. 270
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes