Idaho Salaries for Judges and Justices, SJR 101 (1998)
From Ballotpedia
|
|
|
The Idaho Salaries for Judges and Justices Amendment, also known as Senate Joint Resolution 101, was on the November 3, 1998 ballot in Idaho as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure deleted obsolete language regarding salaries of judges and justices, and provided that salaries be provided by statute.[1]
Election results
| S.J.R. 101 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
 Yes | 236,952 | 72.14% | ||
| No | 91,518 | 27.86% | ||
Election results via: Idaho Secretary of State
Text of measure
Ballot title
The question appeared on the ballot as:[2]
| “ | "Shall Section 17, Article V, and Section 27, Article V, of the Constitution of the State of Idaho be amended to delete obsolete language and to provide that the salaries of justices and judges shall be as provided by statute, to clarify that judges of the Court of Appeals and magistrate judges shall subscribe an oath regarding a thirty day disposition of cases submitted to them and to clarify that the legislature may increase or diminish the compensation of judges of the Court of Appeals and magistrate judges?".[3] | ” |
See also
- Idaho 1998 ballot measures
- 1998 ballot measures
- List of Idaho ballot measures
- History of Initiative & Referendum in Idaho
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Idaho Secretary of State Elections Division, "Idaho Constitutional Amendment History," accessed April 28, 2014
- ↑ Idaho Secretary of State, "1998 General Election Proposed Constitutional Amendment," accessed April 28, 2014
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
 |
State of Idaho Boise (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
 |
