Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Illinois' 3rd Congressional District election, 2020 (March 17 Democratic primary)
- Primary date: March 17
- Primary type: Open
- Registration deadline(s): Feb. 18; Feb. 29 (online)
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Early voting starts: March 2
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): March 17 (postmarked); March 31 (received)
- Voter ID: No ID
- Poll times: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m.
2022 →
← 2018
|
Illinois' 3rd Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: December 2, 2019 |
Primary: March 17, 2020 General: November 3, 2020 Pre-election incumbent: Daniel Lipinski (Democratic) |
How to vote |
Poll times: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Voting in Illinois |
Race ratings |
Inside Elections: Solid Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020 |
See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th • 14th • 15th • 16th • 17th • 18th Illinois elections, 2020 U.S. Congress elections, 2020 U.S. Senate elections, 2020 U.S. House elections, 2020 |
Marie Newman won the Democratic primary for Illinois' 3rd Congressional District on March 17, 2020. Newman received 47.3% of the vote to incumbent Daniel Lipinski's 44.6%. Rush Darwish and Charles M. Hughes also ran in the primary. Newman advanced to the district's general election on November 3, 2020.
Of the four candidates who ran, Lipinski and Newman led in endorsements, fundraising, and media attention. The two candidates faced off in the district's 2018 Democratic primary; Lipinski received 51.1% of the vote to Newman's 48.9%.
Lipinski, who was first elected in 2004, said that he was "the common-sense Democrat" and criticized what he called Newman's socialist ideology and leftist fantasies.[1][2] Regarding healthcare, a Lipinski campaign ad stated, "Newman’s extreme plan would eliminate all private health insurance. Millions would lose their healthcare and be put on the government plan. Seniors would lose their Medicare options. Taxes would skyrocket. And we could lose access to our doctors. Marie Newman would take away your healthcare."[1]
Newman said that Lipinski was not a real Democrat.[3] She stated, "Since 2004, my opponent has ignored the concerns of wide swaths of his constituency. He voted against the Affordable Care Act, against the Dream Act, and has repeatedly stood with the Republican party to attack workers, women and the LGBTQ community."[4] A Newman campaign ad stated, "People concerned about healthcare can’t trust Dan Lipinski. Lipinski voted against Obamacare, which means he would deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. … Unlike Dan Lipinski, Marie is the only Democrat who will fight to expand healthcare to everyone."[5]
Darwish described himself as a "first-generation American, a small business owner, and proud community member and activist."[6] He said of Lipinski, "We do have a representative right now that really does act more like a Republican than a Democrat," and he described Newman as "pretty much the extreme left of what Dan Lipinski represents."[7]
According to financial reports through February 26, 2020, Newman led the candidates in fundraising with around $1.7 million, followed by Lipinski with $1.2 million and Darwish with $816,000. No data was available for Hughes.[8]
Satellite spending in the race came from Susan B. Anthony List-affiliated super PAC Women Speak Out in support of Lipinski and Women Vote!, NARAL, SEIU, Indivisible, Planned Parenthood Votes, and the Illinois Federation of Teachers in support of Newman.
Heading into the 2020 election, the district had been held by Democrats since 1975.[9] Major race rating outlets rated the general election as Solid Democratic or Safe Democratic. The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was D+6, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 6 percentage points more Democratic than the national average. Click here to learn more about what's at stake in the general election.
Click on candidate names below to view their key messages:
![]() Lipinski |
![]() Darwish |
![]() Newman |
For more information about the Republican primary, click here.
For more information about the general election, click here.
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
Illinois modified its primary election process as follows:
- Candidate filing procedures: Candidates for state-level office were exempted from filing statements of economic interests for the duration of the governor's disaster proclamation period and for 30 days thereafter.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 3
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Marie Newman ![]() | 47.3 | 52,384 |
![]() | Daniel Lipinski | 44.7 | 49,568 | |
![]() | Rush Darwish ![]() | 5.7 | 6,351 | |
![]() | Charles Hughes | 2.3 | 2,549 |
Total votes: 110,852 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Abe Matthew (D)
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff compiled a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[10] Additional candidate profiles may be added up until election day. Candidates may click here to complete a survey and have their candidate profile added.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: Yes
Political Office:
U.S. House (Assumed office: 2005)
Biography: Lipinski graduated from Northwestern University with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1988. In 1989, he received an M.S. in engineering-economic systems from Stanford University. He graduated from Duke University with a Ph.D. in political science in 1998. Lipinski worked as a staff member for multiple U.S. representatives and was a professor at the University of Notre Dame, the University of Tennessee, and James Madison University.
Show sources
Sources: YouTube, "IL-03: Dan Lipinski attack ad," February 21, 2020 Facebook, "Dan Lipinski for Congress," accessed March 8, 2020 Facebook, "Dan Lipinski for Congress on March 5, 2020," accessed March 8, 2020; Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, "LIPINSKI, Daniel (1966-)," accessed March 8, 2020 Congressman Daniel Lipinski, "About Me," accessed March 8, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Illinois District 3 in 2020.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "I am a first-generation American, a small business owner, and proud community member and activist. My parents came to this country seeking a better life, and growing up, I knew the power and the promise of the American Dream. I seek to bring that experience and understanding to Congress, where I will work in the interest of everyday Americans, not the special interests and PACs that Washington politicians work for. I have always had a deep desire to improve my community. I have been involved in working to improve the lives of both Americans as well as people around the world. I have served as a member of the Executive Board of AMVote PAC, where I have worked to increase voter registration and political engagement in the 3rd Congressional District, and served on the transition team for Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot. In addition to working to improve my community, I am a small business owner. I was a newscaster for ten years, after which I started an award-winning multimedia production company. However, I am most proud of being a husband to my wonderful wife, Aziza and a father to my two boys, Adam and Amir."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Illinois District 3 in 2020.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Biography: Newman earned a B.A. in journalism and business from the University of Wisconsin. As of her 2020 campaign, her professional experience included being president of Marie Newman & Associates, a marketing and business strategy company.
Show sources
Sources: Marie Newman 2020 campaign website, "The Issues," accessed March 8, 2020 Chicago Tribune, "Who is Marie Newman, Democratic candidate for 3rd Congressional District?," February 19, 2020 YouTube, "A Clear Choice for IL03," March 4, 2020; LinkedIn, "Marie Newman," accessed March 8, 2020 Patch: Oak Lawn, IL, "3rd Congressional District Candidate: Marie Newman," March 3, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Illinois District 3 in 2020.
Endorsements
This section lists endorsements issued in this election. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please email us.
Click on the links below to explore each candidate's full list of endorsements on their campaign websites:
Democratic primary endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Lipinski | Newman | ||||
Newspapers and editorials | ||||||
Chicago Tribune[11] | ✔ | |||||
Chicago Sun-Times[12] | ✔ | |||||
Daily Kos[13] | ✔ | |||||
Gazette Chicago[14] | ✔ | |||||
Elected officials | ||||||
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Sen. Laura Fine (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Delia Ramirez (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Ann M. Williams (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Will Guzzardi (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Elizabeth (Lisa) Hernandez (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
State Rep. Theresa Mah (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot[12] | ✔ | |||||
Chicago City Clerk Anna Valencia[12] | ✔ | |||||
Eight Chicago aldermen (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
27 mayors (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
Individuals | ||||||
Former U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julian Castro[15] | ✔ | |||||
Former U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.)[12] | ✔ | |||||
Former State Sen. Toi Hutchinson (D)[12] | ✔ | |||||
Organizations | ||||||
Worth Township Democratic Organization[16] | ✔ | |||||
AFL-CIO[17] | ✔ | |||||
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees[17] | ✔ | |||||
United Steelworkers[17] | ✔ | |||||
National Weather Service Employees Organization[17] | ✔ | |||||
International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers[17] | ✔ | |||||
American Train Dispatchers Association[17] | ✔ | |||||
Transport Workers Union[17] | ✔ | |||||
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen[17] | ✔ | |||||
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Crafterworkers[17] | ✔ | |||||
Association of Flight Attendants, CWA, AFL-CIO[17] | ✔ | |||||
Transportation Communications Union / IAM[17] | ✔ | |||||
Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers[17] | ✔ | |||||
Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association[17] | ✔ | |||||
Associated Firefighters of Illinois[17] | ✔ | |||||
Chicago Federation of Labor[17] | ✔ | |||||
National Conference of Firemen and Oilers[17] | ✔ | |||||
16 local labor unions (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
EMILY's List[12] | ✔ | |||||
Planned Parenthood Action Fund[12] | ✔ | |||||
NARAL[12] | ✔ | |||||
MoveOn[12] | ✔ | |||||
Justice Democrats[12] | ✔ | |||||
Sierra Club[12] | ✔ | |||||
Blue America[12] | ✔ | |||||
Progressive Democrats of America[12] | ✔ | |||||
Sunrise Movement[12] | ✔ | |||||
Progressive Change Campaign Committee[12] | ✔ | |||||
Off the Sidelines[12] | ✔ | |||||
National Organization for Women PAC[12] | ✔ | |||||
Illinois National Organization for Women[12] | ✔ | |||||
Democracy for America[12] | ✔ | |||||
Northside Democracy for America[12] | ✔ | |||||
Our Revolution Chicago-Southwest Side[12] | ✔ | |||||
Will County Progressives[12] | ✔ | |||||
Indivisible[12] | ✔ | |||||
Nine local Indivisible chapters (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
Four ward independent political organizations (IPOs) (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
Illinois SEIU[12] | ✔ | |||||
Illinois Federation of Teachers[12] | ✔ | |||||
National Nurses United[12] | ✔ | |||||
Illinois Nurses Association[18] | ✔ | |||||
Seven local labor unions (hover over for list) | ✔ | |||||
Population Connection Action Fund | ✔ | |||||
Women's March Illinois[12] | ✔ | |||||
The People's Lobby[12] | ✔ | |||||
350 Action[12] | ✔ | |||||
Familia Latina Unida[12] | ✔ | |||||
Progressive Rising[12] | ✔ | |||||
Rizoma Collective[12] | ✔ | |||||
Jane Addams Seniors in Action[12] | ✔ | |||||
Demand Universal Healthcare[12] | ✔ | |||||
National Women's Political Caucus[12] | ✔ | |||||
Asian American Midwest Progressives[12] | ✔ | |||||
Citizen Action Illinois[12] | ✔ | |||||
Courage to Change[12] | ✔ | |||||
Peace Action[12] | ✔ | |||||
#VOTEPROCHOICE[12] | ✔ | |||||
Friends of the Earth Action[12] | ✔ | |||||
Latino Leadership Council[12] | ✔ | |||||
Friends of Intelligent Democracy PAC[19] | ✔ | |||||
Coalition for Change IL3[12] | ✔ | |||||
Illinois 123GO[12] | ✔ | |||||
Southwest Suburban Snowflakes[12] | ✔ | |||||
Southwest Suburban Activists[12] | ✔ |
Timeline
2020
Campaign themes
- See also: Campaign themes
Campaign themes were available on the following candidates' campaign websites as of March 4, 2020.
Daniel Lipinski
Lipinski's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Boosting American Manufacturing Manufacturing built America and the middle class, and if we’re going to rebuild the middle class we need to boost American manufacturing. That’s why I authored the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act; the passage of this bill into law means that America will have a manufacturing strategy for the first time since Alexander Hamilton. The first plan will be published in Spring 2018, and every four years a revised plan will be created. If we fail to plan, we plan to fail; we cannot fail on manufacturing or else we’re failing America’s middle class. I have also been a leader in promoting Buy American policies, which assure that when the federal government spends taxpayer money it is investing in American-made goods and American workers. I have been successful in adding Buy American provisions to numerous pieces of legislation and have introduced the Buy American Improvement Act to expand made-in-America requirements to more federal programs and to close loopholes in current policy. Putting American manufacturing and manufacturing workers on the cutting edge of innovation is vital for our competitiveness. I was a leader in getting the law passed to create the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, which is the program that led to Chicago’s Digital Manufacturing Design Institute, a pioneering center that will help manufacturing in Illinois and the nation innovate and become more efficient, while also training workers in cutting edge technologies. Fighting for Fair Trade Middle-class Americans have suffered from bad trade deals made over the past 25 years. Manufacturing has been particularly hard hit. These agreements have contributed significantly to stagnant wages. I have fought against bad trade deals. I helped lead the fight that killed the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), which would have been the biggest trade deal in history and would have led to more disastrous job losses. We need a new model for trade that protects American workers. That is why I helped introduce legislation to establish a 21st Century Workers Bill of Rights that should be included in all future trade agreements to protect workers’ rights instead of only helping multinational corporations. Fostering Innovation for Job Growth America must remain at the cutting edge of innovation if we are going to have a strong economy and create new jobs for the middle class. As the top Democrat on the Science, Space, and Technology Committee’s Research and Technology Subcommittee, I have been a leader in making sure that America continues to fund research and give entrepreneurs the tools they need to innovate. I helped create the Innovation Corps that is helping to turn research at universities, national labs, and federal agencies into new products and new jobs. I also helped bring the federally-funded research center on battery technology to Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont. Keeping Communities Safe One of the most important priorities for elected officials should be working to keep their communities safe. I have made it a priority to support our brave police officers, firefighters, and other first responders, and I have secured millions of dollars in federal funding to hire more officers and firefighters and purchase new equipment. I passed a law naming a local post office after a fallen Chicago firefighter – Captain Herbie Johnson, fought for federal funding for memorials for fallen police officers, and helped raised money to purchase bullet-proof vests for local police. I understand the need to do a better job keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and have supported measures that expand background checks to all gun sales and that make gun trafficking a federal crime. I have introduced legislation to improve security on transit systems and worked with the DOT and railroads to develop an app that will help firefighters prepare for and respond to incidents involving hazardous materials. I’ve passed an amendment to strengthen regulations governing railroad tank car safety. To fight the opioid crisis, I have fought for increased funding for addiction treatment and helped establish local drug disposal points. Standing Up for Women Unfortunately, women continue to face inequality in pay and treatment at work. To provide greater opportunities for women I’ve supported the Paycheck Fairness Act and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to close the wage gap and prevent pay discrimination. I’ve also cosponsored the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, to require employers to provide proper accommodations for pregnant workers. And to ensure that pregnancy can be increasingly safe, I’ve supported measures to reduce maternal deaths, improve access to maternity care, and to help better address post-partum depression. I have been a strong supporter of reauthorizing and fully funding the Violence Against Women Act, and I was also proud to author legislation, signed into law, that requires the Defense Department to deploy specially-trained sexual assault nurses with all military deployments to assure that we can properly treat sexual assault victims and prosecute perpetrators. Fixing Local Transportation As the most senior member from Illinois on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, I have been a leader in Congress improving local roads, transit, trails, and airports. I understand that easing congestion on our roads saves every family time and money, as well as helping to spur job growth in our region. I helped author the FAST Act in 2015 which increased federal funding for Illinois roads by 10 percent and increased funding for public transit. I have brought home more than $375 million in federal money for local transportation projects. I fought for and achieved expanded service on Metra’s Southwest Service and Heritage Corridor Lines and helped improve Metra, Pace, and CTA stations and transit centers in the Third District. I’ve brought back tens of millions of dollars to help Midway Airport remain an economic engine on the Southwest Side of Chicago, while also working to alleviate noise issues that affect local residents. Supporting Seniors Seniors built this nation through their hard work and sacrifice. We owe it to our seniors and future generations to protect and strengthen Social Security and Medicare. I have fought against privatizing Social Security and against raids of the Medicare Trust Fund. During my tenure, I’ve held over 100 Senior Fairs across the 3rd District and helped hundreds of seniors receive help with Social Security, Medicare, and other issues. I’ve helped introduce legislation to create an inflation index based on the real costs that seniors face so that they see more realistic annual increases in their Social Security checks. Enhancing Access to Affordable Health Care Working to lower healthcare costs and expand access to quality care continues to be a top priority for me. Our healthcare system must work better for America’s middle class and for small businesses. Having lived with Type-1 diabetes for more than 30 years, I understand the costs and complexities of healthcare. I will continue to advocate for a thoughtful, multi-faceted approach to healthcare reform that addresses costs while protecting doctor and coverage choices. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) needs to be made better and more affordable, not repealed. That’s why I opposed every attempt to repeal or undermine the ACA while supporting multiple improvements. But we must also work to lower insurance premiums and rein in the costs of prescription drugs, hospitals, and doctors for everyone. This is necessary and achievable, but it is not simple. It requires well thought-out solutions, not slogans. You can find my plan here. Honoring Veterans We can never fully repay all the brave men and women who have defended our nation and kept us free, but we must do all we can to honor and take care of our veterans. I have consistently worked for more funding for veterans and better medical treatment at the VA. I have fought for better treatment and for jobs and business opportunities for our recently returning service members. I spurred the Defense Department to bring home the remains of Americans who died in the pivotal WWII Battle of Tarawa. I have supported Honor Flight and have helped veterans share their stories through the Veterans History Project. Through my constituent service program, my staff and I have helped hundreds of veterans in the district receive the benefits they have earned. Championing Small Business Small businesses are the foundation of our economy and I’ve fought to make sure the federal government expands opportunities for small businesses to thrive. If we don’t support our small business owners, our communities will suffer. That is why I support putting our small businesses on a level playing field with online sellers instead of placing an unfair tax burden on them. I have fought against and helped repeal overburdensome regulations that were hurting small businesses. I cosponsored and helped enact into law the Small Business Health Care Relief Act and the Protecting Affordable Coverage for Employees Act, which fixed flaws in the ACA that would have destabilized the small business insurance market and effectively prohibited small businesses from assisting their workers with purchasing health coverage. While we’ve lost local manufacturers over the years we still have many fighting to survive and provide good-paying jobs. When a local small manufacturer lost a contract because the DOD didn’t follow Buy American laws, I stepped in and got the decision reversed, resulting in dozens of more jobs. I’ve been a leader in expanding the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs to give new businesses an early boost. Reforming our Immigration Laws Most immigrants come to the United States to work hard and make a better life for themselves and their families. It is in our national interest for Congress to act on comprehensive immigration reform. I will continue to push for legislation that allows immigrants to contribute to and become a part of our nation, while also stopping illegal immigration, defending our borders, and protecting American workers. We should start by passing the BRIDGE Act – which I have cosponsored and built bipartisan support for – to protect from deportation those brought to our nation as children and who have qualified for DACA status. While we must always protect our nation from those who would do us harm, I have opposed President Trump’s ill-conceived travel ban which has been harmful to innocent individuals, including refugees fleeing persecution. Improving Education I taught American Government to college students before being elected to Congress, so I understand how critical a good, affordable education is for every American to reach their potential and for our nation to thrive. I have fought to make college more affordable and lower the onerous college loans that are saddling so many young people and their families. I helped repeal the ill-conceived No Child Left Behind Act which was hindering K-12 education, and replace it with a better law to help state and local governments determine how to best educate our children. As co-chair of the congressional STEM Education Caucus, the top Democrat on the Science Committee’s Research and Technology Subcommittee, and a former engineer, I have been a leader in improving science, technology, engineering, and math education at all levels and helping to increase the pipeline of students into STEM. Keeping America Safe Americans face numerous security threats from countries like North Korea, China, Russia, and Iran, as well as terrorist organizations such as ISIS and their sympathizers. To keep our nation safe, we must have a strong military that provides our brave service members with the tools they need to protect us. I have supported robust funding for our military while opposing wasteful spending. And I have opposed intervention when it was not in the best interest of our nation, such as in Libya. Protecting the Environment I know that we must take care of our environment to protect the health and well-being of all Americans. I have been a leader in creating policies that promote energy efficiency, cut emissions of dangerous pollutants, and help develop and bring to market clean alternative energy technologies. The Great Lakes are a tremendous environmental asset; I have continuously fought against pollution in the lake and I am leading efforts to support their restoration. I am a member of the House Climate Solutions Caucus and have brought Republican members into the group to advance effective policy solutions to deal with climate threats. I’ve been a strong supporter of the Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy production, and to make investments in helping developing nations transition to a clean energy future. I have protected our national parks and other federal lands from exploitation. I’ve also fought for clean water, to protect this important national asset and assure safe drinking water for all Americans. Defending Consumers Far too often, Americans are not treated fairly by some businesses. These hassles make everyday life more difficult and end up wasting our time and money. That is why I have been a champion for consumers’ rights, pushing commonsense rules to require airlines to take better care of passengers whose flights are delayed by fault of the airline, and passing legislation that requires the return of baggage fees for delayed luggage. I’ve also fought to prevent telemarketers from being able to use ringless voicemails that would fill up cell phone voicemail boxes, and have fought against legislation that would undermine net neutrality and let cable companies and others limit your access to the content you want from the Internet. Promoting Fiscal Responsibility Our growing national debt threatens the long-term solvency of Medicare, Social Security, and our ability to invest in national priorities like infrastructure, education, and research. I’ve made it a priority to try to keep our government’s focus on budget sanity a priority, and the Concord Coalition has recognized me for my fiscal leadership. Since passing a budget is one of Congress’s most important responsibilities, I support No Budget, No Pay, so that when we don’t pass our bills on time, we don’t get paid.[26] |
” |
—Dan Lipinski’s campaign website (2020)[27] |
Rush Darwish
Darwish's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
I support Medicare for all who want it. Americans are suffering from a healthcare crisis. While politicians in Washington debate, Americans face serious uncertainty regarding their coverage and their employer-provided plans. In every other developed country, healthcare is treated as a basic right and is provided at significantly lower cost. Today, the United States is the wealthiest country that has ever existed. Our healthcare system must reflect this reality and treat healthcare as a human right, not a privilege. As it exists today, healthcare policy in the United States creates a two-tiered system that favors the richest at the expense of millions of Americans. To provide millions of Americans with the healthcare they both need and deserve, I support the Medicare for America Act as proposed by Reps. Rosa DeLauro and Jan Schakowsky. Medicare for America would provide coverage for every uninsured American and lower costs for those already insured by doing the following: 1. Allow Americans who like their insurance plans to keep them. Under the Medicare For America plan, those enrolled in employer-sponsored insurance programs would have the option to remain enrolled in their current plan. However, prior authorization and step therapy will be banned, meaning your insurance provider will no longer be able to require you to “try” cheaper or generic medications before covering the best possible treatment. This plan will allow the government to negotiate prescription drug prices, so that Big Pharma will no longer be able to charge unlimited amounts on necessary medications and pharmaceutical products. Should providers refuse to negotiate with the Department of Health and Human Services, prices would be established according to the Department of Veterans Affairs prices or by basing prices on average global market rates. Additionally, Medicare for America finally puts an end to Fee For Service private arrangements, which will help in lowering overall private insurance costs. 2. Provide a low-cost, public option for every uninsured American as well as those who would like to switch. Medicare for America provides a low-cost, public option for insurance coverage, in which enrollees would “pay in” no more than 8% of their monthly income. Those with incomes twice the federal poverty line or below would pay no premiums at all. 3. Allow for expanded coverage through Medicare Advantage. Medicare For America also provides greater choice in the form of Medicare Advantage. Individuals and families can enroll in Medicare Advantage plans and pay separate premiums for additional coverage, on top of the public and private insurance options. Increased coverage under Medicare For America would include long term services, as well as disability and senior citizen coverage, a great improvement on the current state of Medicare and private insurance providers. So how do we pay for it? Voters have a right to know how healthcare plans will be paid for. Reps. DeLauro and Schakowsky propose getting rid of the 2017 Republican tax bill and implementing a 5% surtax on adjusted gross incomes of over $500K.[1] If you make less than $500,000 a year, your taxes won’t go up. Medicare for America also makes sure that states would pay no more into Medicaid and CHIP programs than they already do under what are known as maintenance of effort payments. The rate of inflation on these payments for states will grow over time, however.[2] I support Medicare for all who want it because I believe in providing choice. Too many politicians in Washington don’t believe that healthcare is a right, or don’t trust Americans to choose what is right for them. I believe that Medicare for America is the best way to ensure choice while providing coverage for every American. The reason I support Medicare for America is because I trust my fellow Americans to make the right decision for themselves and their families. [1] This accounts for additional incomes outside of primary source of income like capital gains. [2] States that accepted the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act would receive a discount on inflation rates for maintenance of effort payments for the first 10 years, after which all states would pay the same amount. Economy/Job Creation Thousands of families across the 3rd District are struggling to make ends meet. It’s becoming more difficult than ever to qualify to buy a home and people are pushing their dreams off further and further. At the same time there’s a rising demand in the technology, manufacturing, and transportation industries for skilled workers. I believe in social innovation, and the reality is that the current economic situation for a lot of families in our district is unsustainable; while I fully support a Federal Minimum Wage of $15, I believe that more must be done to support our families. As your Congressman I would:
My wife and I have been dealing with student loans throughout our marriage, 18 years and 2 kids later and we’re still paying them. This experience is a systemic crisis, thousands of students across the US graduate each year with tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt. These folks are forced to put off their goals and instead spend years and years paying off this debt. I firmly believe that the key to our future as a nation is investing in our public education systems – primary, secondary, and post-secondary – to allow them to have adequate funding, providing students with low, or no cost education. In an effort to do our part, my family and I founded an annual scholarship at Moraine Valley Community College to lessen the financial burden on recipients, but what we need as a country is a reallocation of funds to our public education systems to support our students. As your Congressman I would:
Immigration This country was built by immigrants seeking freedom from persecution, seeking a better opportunity, and working towards a better tomorrow. My parents are immigrants who came here for a better opportunity, with the dream to raise our family. The current administration’s anti-immigrant rhetoric and actions are simply unacceptable: the Muslim ban, the family separation policy, making migrants fleeing violence wait for months at the border to apply for asylum, the ICE raids on places of business, the actions being taken to deny green card applicants and visa applicants by expanding the LPC test, the almost everyday stream of racist and tasteless comments about different communities. This is an attack not only on those communities, but on our ideals and values as Americans. This administration is dehumanizing these families and I am absolutely unwilling to allow it to continue. Asylum is an internationally recognized human right. In my personal time, I have been connecting undocumented families I know with pro-bono immigration attorneys to assist them in gaining legal status. While I believe that has made a small difference, what we need as a country is comprehensive and fair immigration reform to put these families on a path to citizenship and prevent any future administration from the egregious actions which have taken place over the last few years. As your Congressman I would:
Women’s Rights As a government which prides itself on being a leader in human rights, civil rights, and civil liberties I believe we have done a great disservice to half of our constituents. To think that in our country today I, as a male, have a higher income sheerly on the basis of my sex is absurd. What’s more is women’s reproductive rights are regularly under attack in states across the country. In the case of Georgia specifically, that bill allows for a woman who miscarried to potentially be investigated, does not include language protecting women from criminal prosecution should they seek an abortion, among other ludicrous inclusions. This is a far governmental overreach into the lives of constituents. The fact of the matter is the Georgia bill and bills like it, passed in Alabama, Mississippi, Ohio, and introduced in many other states put women’s health and lives at risk. I believe in a woman’s right to choose; that we have control over our own bodies is essential to the very core of personal liberty. As your Congressman I would:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health In America today there are crises surrounding substance use, particularly opioids, and mental health which we can no longer avoid. 130 people die everyday as a result of opioid overdoses, and the CDCP estimates that the cost of prescription opioid misuse is over 78 billion dollars each year! (reference footnoted) I believe in accountability, and the fact is this crisis is primarily due to a lack of oversight and regulation over the Pharmaceutical industry, which promoted these drugs to physicians with the false pretense that they were non-addictive. I think it speaks volumes about our current mental health system when one of the largest mental health facilities in the country is Cook County Jail. On top of the fact that the stigma of mental health is a barrier from seeking proper care, mental health centers have been closing across our state due to a decrease in funding. Our families simply do not have adequate access to the programs and resources they need to help them overcome these issues. As your Congressman I would:
Supporting Small Businesses I’ve always had the vision of owning my own production company. In 2006, I started Rush Productions from the basement of my home. I couldn’t qualify for a loan, and I had very little equipment of my own so I borrowed equipment from some generous friends in the industry. Business picked up quickly, but then the recession in 2008 hit, practically erasing all of the progress I made. With the help of family and friends, I was fortunate enough to get back up and running and today have a fully functional storefront business with multiple locations and all the equipment and gadgets I could possibly need. As a small business owner I understand how difficult it can be at times. All across our country, the same banks that caused the recession and got bailed out with our tax dollars are denying families the small business loans they need to achieve their dreams. Corporations like Amazon and Walmart are getting larger and larger, putting existing small businesses at risk. All this while our government sits by and does nothing. As your Congressman I would:
Campaign Finance Reform There is too much money in politics and, as much as some politicians like to deny it, money buys influence. In our current system industries have the upper hand, they’re worth billions of dollars and have no issue putting in hundreds of millions towards candidate’s committees. If an incumbent comes out against them, they pour millions of dollars into their opponent’s campaign. This issue is further exacerbated by the use of dark money, and lack of enforcement surrounding campaign finance violations. The funding system has become very complex and far-reaching, and lost in the midst of things are the issues families care about the most. While grassroots, crowd-sourced, funding strategies are effective in theory, they simply cannot create as much funding as quickly. This is why we need comprehensive reform. As your Congressman I would:
Climate Change and the Environment The science is clear, global climate patterns are shifting and it is up to us to take action to protect our future generations. We simply cannot continue to put off action on this issue, in the past 10 years climate change has cost US taxpayers over 350 billion dollars. Corporations cannot be allowed to continue to pollute our air with toxins, which is why I supported the Sterigenics shutdown. We cannot continue to rely on fossil fuels and coal to power our lives. We have a responsibility to ensure our future generations will have clean air, water, energy, and be safe from environmental disasters resulting from climate change. As your Congressman I would:
Gun Violence Prevention Gun violence is an epidemic in our country and recent events have demonstrated the gun violence epidemic is in fact a national emergency. In recent years, we have all seen the tragic violence that domestic terrorists can inflict with assault rifles and demented ideology, be it anarchy or white supremacy. Policies need to focus on the disproportionate impact of gun violence on communities of color – Black men are over 10 times as likely and Hispanic men are over 3 times as likely to be gun homicide victims than white men. Here in the 3rd District, we are also exposed on a weekly basis to the less publicized displays of gun violence on our city streets. I believe that federal legislation regulating the purchase of firearms does not infringe on the rights afforded by the Second Amendment. Legislation I am proposing does not stop an individual from purchasing a firearm. Rather, these proposals are focused on three primary goals: 1. Creating harsher federal sentences for those who buy and sell illegal guns Rush believes that those who profit from and exploit the straw purchasing loopholes in various states, as well as those criminals stockpile weapons by acquiring guns illegally from these straw purchasers, are the biggest contributors to the endless gun violence in Chicagoland and other urban areas. Rush has proposed “Sell for Life” legislation, which would ensure that straw purchasers and anyone else who buys or sells guns illegally would be charged with a federal crime with a life sentence. Illegal gun sales contribute to thousands of deaths across the country each year and should be treated the same way as the crime of first-degree murder. Representative Robin Kelly’s H.B 6441, making all straw purchases of firearms a federal crime, is a good first step on this front and should be passed by Congress immediately. 2. Taking assault rifles, high capacity magazine clips, and other weapons of war completely off our streets The use of assault rifles in mass killings across the country has allowed domestic terrorists to rack up tragically high body counts in a short period of time. Assault rifles and high capacity magazine clips are weapons of war and should be treated as such. Rush believes Congress should immediately pass a national ban on the importation and sale of all assault rifles and high capacity magazine clips. These weapons should only be utilized by our Armed forces and at certain times by local law enforcement. 3. Implementing the most thorough and transparent set of federal background checks for those wishing to purchase a firearm Unfortunately, the number of white nationalist groups in the United States, those particularly electrified by Trump’s presidency, surged by almost 50 percent in 2018. Recent events have demonstrated that inhabitants of the dark web attracted to radical ideologies like anarchy and white nationalism should not be allowed to purchase firearms, and a federal database that takes this into account in its background checks may very well stop the next mass shooting. Homeland Security should be investing the resources and the manpower to address this rising white nationalist threat that threatens the safety of all Americans. We are living in a data-rich age and private companies often know more about our internet search history and consumer habits than we do ourselves. There is no reason big data can’t work towards developing a national background check database that would be a required screening step before any American purchases a firearm.[26] |
” |
—Rush Darwish’s campaign website (2020)[28] |
Marie Newman
Newman's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Economy That Works for All Working families, workers, and the middle class are working harder with fewer opportunities to get ahead. I pledge to bridge the income divide by helping and empowering working families, workers, and the middle class. This will be my priority.
Health Care for All
Immigration
Transportation and Infrastructure
Take Money Out of Politics
Green Economy
Commonsense Gun Reform
Education That Leads to Real Jobs
Promoting Small and New Businesses
Protecting and Advancing Everybody’s Rights Racial Justice
LGBTQ Rights
Supporting People with Disabilities
Women
|
” |
—Marie Newman’s campaign website (2020)[29] |
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Daniel Lipinski
Supporting Lipinski
|
Opposing Newman
|
|
Rush Darwish
Supporting Darwish
|
|
|
|
Opposing Lipinski and Newman
|
Marie Newman
Supporting Newman
|
|
Opposing Lipinski
|
Satellite group ads
Click "show" to the right to see satellite group ads. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opposing Lipinski
|
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
If you are aware of polls conducted in this race, please email us.
Campaign finance
This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[30] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[31] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Lipinski | Democratic Party | $1,751,438 | $2,170,908 | $30,685 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Rush Darwish | Democratic Party | $872,010 | $834,328 | $37,682 | As of March 31, 2020 |
Charles Hughes | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Marie Newman | Democratic Party | $2,835,512 | $2,732,742 | $102,841 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Satellite spending
- See also: Satellite spending
Satellite spending, commonly referred to as outside spending, describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[32][33][34]
This section lists satellite spending in this race reported by news outlets in alphabetical order. If you are aware of spending that should be included, please email us.
- The Susan B. Anthony List-affiliated Women Speak Out super PAC announced a "five-figure campaign" supporting Lipinski on March 6, 2020. According to a press release, the campaign would target 17,000 households with digital ads, phone calls, and mail.[22]
- The super PAC Women Vote! spent $330,000 on TV ads criticizing Lipinski as part of a $1.4 million campaign supporting Newman. The campaign was backed by a group of organizations that also included NARAL, SEIU, Indivisible, Planned Parenthood Votes, and the Illinois Federation of Teachers. Politico reported the spending on February 25, 2020.[23][24]
Interviews and questionnaires
Click the links below to view candidates' responses to questionnaires.
Debates and forums
March 6, 2020
Lipinski, Darwish, Hughes, and Newman participated in a forum on WTTW that aired on March 10, 2020.
- Video: WTTW
- Coverage: Chicago Tribune
Click [show] to view footage of the debate | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
February 20, 2020
Darwish and Hughes participated in a forum hosted by the League of Women Voters of the La Grange Area.
- Coverage: Riverside Brookfield Landmark
Primaries in Illinois
A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. Illinois uses an open primary system. Voters do not have to register with a party, but they do have to choose, publicly, which party's ballot they will vote on at the primary election.[35][36]
For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.
What's at stake in the general election?
U.S. House elections were held on November 3, 2020, and coincided with the 2020 presidential election. All 435 House districts were up for election, and the results determined control of the U.S. House in the 117th Congress.
At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232-197 advantage over Republicans. There was one Libertarian member, and there were five vacancies. Republicans needed to gain a net 21 seats to win control of the House. Democrats needed to gain seats or lose fewer than 14 net seats to keep their majority.
In the 2018 midterm election, Democrats had a net gain of 40 seats, winning a 235-200 majority in the House. Heading into the 2018 election, Republicans had a 235-193 majority with seven vacancies.
In the 25 previous House elections that coincided with a presidential election, the president's party had gained House seats in 16 elections and lost seats in nine. In years where the president's party won districts, the average gain was 18. In years where the president's party lost districts, the average loss was 27. Click here for more information on presidential partisanship and down-ballot outcomes.
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[37]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[38][39][40]
Race ratings: Illinois' 3rd Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | Solid Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Safe Democratic | Safe Democratic | Safe Democratic | Safe Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was D+6, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 6 percentage points more Democratic than the national average. This made Illinois' 3rd Congressional District the 156th most Democratic nationally.[41]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.00. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.00 points toward that party.[42]
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Eleven of 102 Illinois counties—10.8 percent—are Pivot Counties. These are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Alexander County, Illinois | 8.30% | 13.65% | 12.62% | ||||
Carroll County, Illinois | 26.69% | 1.49% | 4.81% | ||||
Fulton County, Illinois | 14.93% | 11.04% | 21.33% | ||||
Henderson County, Illinois | 28.43% | 12.25% | 17.67% | ||||
Henry County, Illinois | 20.99% | 3.08% | 7.74% | ||||
Jo Daviess County, Illinois | 14.64% | 1.16% | 10.49% | ||||
Knox County, Illinois | 2.91% | 17.37% | 19.89% | ||||
Mercer County, Illinois | 20.36% | 7.39% | 11.91% | ||||
Putnam County, Illinois | 19.92% | 1.82% | 15.64% | ||||
Warren County, Illinois | 16.50% | 5.47% | 8.08% | ||||
Whiteside County, Illinois | 6.18% | 17.02% | 17.56% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won Illinois with 55.8 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 38.8 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Illinois voted Republican 50 percent of the time and Democratic 50 percent of the time. Illinois voted Democratic in all five elections from 2000 to 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Illinois. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[43][44]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 75 out of 118 state House districts in Illinois with an average margin of victory of 39.2 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 76 out of 118 state House districts in Illinois with an average margin of victory of 42.1 points. Clinton won 13 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 43 out of 118 state House districts in Illinois with an average margin of victory of 15 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 42 out of 118 state House districts in Illinois with an average margin of victory of 22.1 points. Trump won four districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 83.62% | 15.21% | D+68.4 | 82.32% | 14.37% | D+68 | D |
2 | 82.39% | 15.42% | D+67 | 80.05% | 14.65% | D+65.4 | D |
3 | 79.93% | 18.51% | D+61.4 | 79.31% | 17.11% | D+62.2 | D |
4 | 85.70% | 11.51% | D+74.2 | 86.74% | 8.01% | D+78.7 | D |
5 | 85.51% | 13.50% | D+72 | 86.81% | 9.67% | D+77.1 | D |
6 | 87.98% | 11.09% | D+76.9 | 85.82% | 10.82% | D+75 | D |
7 | 80.06% | 18.99% | D+61.1 | 80.62% | 15.84% | D+64.8 | D |
8 | 86.10% | 13.03% | D+73.1 | 85.11% | 11.52% | D+73.6 | D |
9 | 87.33% | 11.58% | D+75.8 | 87.72% | 8.52% | D+79.2 | D |
10 | 89.16% | 9.51% | D+79.7 | 89.44% | 6.93% | D+82.5 | D |
11 | 70.89% | 26.65% | D+44.2 | 80.64% | 13.16% | D+67.5 | D |
12 | 72.73% | 24.96% | D+47.8 | 81.23% | 13.31% | D+67.9 | D |
13 | 83.32% | 14.08% | D+69.2 | 85.26% | 10.09% | D+75.2 | D |
14 | 86.60% | 10.95% | D+75.7 | 86.67% | 8.59% | D+78.1 | D |
15 | 61.08% | 37.44% | D+23.6 | 63.15% | 32.35% | D+30.8 | D |
16 | 67.28% | 31.33% | D+36 | 70.19% | 26.06% | D+44.1 | D |
17 | 61.83% | 36.93% | D+24.9 | 69.97% | 25.22% | D+44.8 | D |
18 | 66.52% | 31.94% | D+34.6 | 76.28% | 18.12% | D+58.2 | D |
19 | 63.32% | 34.68% | D+28.6 | 60.22% | 34.98% | D+25.2 | D |
20 | 52.74% | 45.64% | D+7.1 | 51.65% | 43.61% | D+8 | R |
21 | 74.33% | 24.11% | D+50.2 | 74.36% | 21.32% | D+53 | D |
22 | 71.92% | 26.75% | D+45.2 | 72.11% | 24.01% | D+48.1 | D |
23 | 68.15% | 30.25% | D+37.9 | 68.21% | 27.01% | D+41.2 | D |
24 | 76.56% | 21.82% | D+54.7 | 78.51% | 17.01% | D+61.5 | D |
25 | 93.09% | 5.86% | D+87.2 | 91.45% | 5.66% | D+85.8 | D |
26 | 85.59% | 13.65% | D+71.9 | 86.53% | 10.16% | D+76.4 | D |
27 | 81.90% | 17.46% | D+64.4 | 79.07% | 18.14% | D+60.9 | D |
28 | 79.41% | 19.90% | D+59.5 | 75.46% | 21.59% | D+53.9 | D |
29 | 83.65% | 15.75% | D+67.9 | 81.69% | 15.87% | D+65.8 | D |
30 | 82.89% | 16.29% | D+66.6 | 79.99% | 16.71% | D+63.3 | D |
31 | 82.49% | 16.80% | D+65.7 | 77.74% | 19.39% | D+58.4 | D |
32 | 87.17% | 12.26% | D+74.9 | 82.32% | 15.18% | D+67.1 | D |
33 | 87.38% | 12.10% | D+75.3 | 85.39% | 12.24% | D+73.2 | D |
34 | 80.42% | 18.91% | D+61.5 | 76.17% | 21.23% | D+54.9 | D |
35 | 56.71% | 41.96% | D+14.8 | 53.87% | 41.66% | D+12.2 | D |
36 | 56.82% | 41.83% | D+15 | 56.15% | 39.16% | D+17 | D |
37 | 39.72% | 58.89% | R+19.2 | 39.49% | 55.32% | R+15.8 | R |
38 | 78.87% | 20.34% | D+58.5 | 76.44% | 20.51% | D+55.9 | D |
39 | 82.46% | 14.81% | D+67.7 | 82.71% | 12.52% | D+70.2 | D |
40 | 81.75% | 15.46% | D+66.3 | 82.84% | 11.67% | D+71.2 | D |
41 | 47.44% | 51.05% | R+3.6 | 55.32% | 38.20% | D+17.1 | R |
42 | 45.06% | 53.21% | R+8.2 | 51.28% | 41.48% | D+9.8 | R |
43 | 65.55% | 32.50% | D+33.1 | 65.81% | 28.61% | D+37.2 | D |
44 | 62.30% | 36.05% | D+26.3 | 62.48% | 32.17% | D+30.3 | D |
45 | 48.18% | 50.30% | R+2.1 | 48.39% | 46.46% | D+1.9 | R |
46 | 58.46% | 39.71% | D+18.8 | 59.07% | 35.26% | D+23.8 | D |
47 | 43.33% | 55.30% | R+12 | 51.72% | 41.63% | D+10.1 | R |
48 | 49.08% | 49.10% | R+0 | 55.13% | 37.66% | D+17.5 | R |
49 | 47.84% | 50.47% | R+2.6 | 52.14% | 40.94% | D+11.2 | R |
50 | 42.69% | 55.72% | R+13 | 44.59% | 48.88% | R+4.3 | R |
51 | 42.13% | 56.55% | R+14.4 | 50.03% | 43.68% | D+6.3 | R |
52 | 44.02% | 54.27% | R+10.3 | 45.31% | 48.09% | R+2.8 | R |
53 | 49.78% | 48.75% | D+1 | 55.58% | 38.54% | D+17 | R |
54 | 47.53% | 50.89% | R+3.4 | 53.16% | 40.31% | D+12.9 | R |
55 | 55.26% | 43.04% | D+12.2 | 57.50% | 37.06% | D+20.4 | D |
56 | 55.72% | 42.70% | D+13 | 56.72% | 37.77% | D+19 | D |
57 | 57.78% | 40.95% | D+16.8 | 61.54% | 33.50% | D+28 | D |
58 | 56.67% | 42.28% | D+14.4 | 67.90% | 27.15% | D+40.8 | D |
59 | 59.17% | 39.44% | D+19.7 | 64.53% | 30.30% | D+34.2 | D |
60 | 75.70% | 23.34% | D+52.4 | 75.53% | 20.08% | D+55.5 | D |
61 | 50.84% | 47.70% | D+3.1 | 51.76% | 42.09% | D+9.7 | R |
62 | 54.69% | 43.51% | D+11.2 | 55.13% | 38.21% | D+16.9 | D |
63 | 45.16% | 52.83% | R+7.7 | 40.55% | 52.68% | R+12.1 | R |
64 | 44.10% | 54.17% | R+10.1 | 41.29% | 52.51% | R+11.2 | R |
65 | 43.52% | 55.10% | R+11.6 | 46.78% | 47.37% | R+0.6 | R |
66 | 46.19% | 52.24% | R+6.1 | 46.91% | 46.96% | R+0.1 | R |
67 | 70.11% | 28.12% | D+42 | 64.34% | 30.36% | D+34 | D |
68 | 48.13% | 50.10% | R+2 | 44.36% | 49.75% | R+5.4 | R |
69 | 43.41% | 54.91% | R+11.5 | 38.97% | 55.13% | R+16.2 | R |
70 | 49.12% | 48.75% | D+0.4 | 46.09% | 46.77% | R+0.7 | R |
71 | 56.68% | 41.68% | D+15 | 43.93% | 50.00% | R+6.1 | R |
72 | 62.60% | 35.95% | D+26.7 | 53.78% | 40.19% | D+13.6 | D |
73 | 37.57% | 60.78% | R+23.2 | 34.45% | 59.10% | R+24.7 | R |
74 | 50.34% | 47.90% | D+2.4 | 37.36% | 56.41% | R+19.1 | R |
75 | 43.44% | 54.51% | R+11.1 | 36.58% | 57.17% | R+20.6 | R |
76 | 52.08% | 46.00% | D+6.1 | 42.52% | 51.68% | R+9.2 | R |
77 | 64.97% | 33.66% | D+31.3 | 64.89% | 30.98% | D+33.9 | D |
78 | 80.57% | 18.10% | D+62.5 | 80.12% | 15.92% | D+64.2 | D |
79 | 48.61% | 49.64% | R+1 | 41.25% | 53.07% | R+11.8 | R |
80 | 66.23% | 32.75% | D+33.5 | 64.99% | 31.42% | D+33.6 | D |
81 | 49.98% | 48.31% | D+1.7 | 54.80% | 38.55% | D+16.3 | R |
82 | 41.03% | 57.68% | R+16.7 | 43.86% | 50.67% | R+6.8 | R |
83 | 69.12% | 29.20% | D+39.9 | 69.54% | 24.80% | D+44.7 | D |
84 | 59.63% | 38.93% | D+20.7 | 63.03% | 31.19% | D+31.8 | D |
85 | 63.64% | 34.81% | D+28.8 | 60.90% | 33.45% | D+27.5 | D |
86 | 65.21% | 33.17% | D+32 | 61.15% | 34.04% | D+27.1 | D |
87 | 36.99% | 60.88% | R+23.9 | 30.62% | 63.34% | R+32.7 | R |
88 | 40.02% | 57.84% | R+17.8 | 38.41% | 54.54% | R+16.1 | R |
89 | 45.79% | 52.18% | R+6.4 | 35.99% | 57.98% | R+22 | R |
90 | 42.91% | 55.12% | R+12.2 | 36.05% | 57.26% | R+21.2 | R |
91 | 50.46% | 47.13% | D+3.3 | 37.74% | 55.81% | R+18.1 | R |
92 | 63.44% | 34.67% | D+28.8 | 59.86% | 34.18% | D+25.7 | D |
93 | 49.27% | 48.45% | D+0.8 | 36.82% | 57.40% | R+20.6 | R |
94 | 37.54% | 60.67% | R+23.1 | 26.64% | 68.63% | R+42 | R |
95 | 42.49% | 54.95% | R+12.5 | 28.84% | 65.74% | R+36.9 | R |
96 | 58.74% | 39.47% | D+19.3 | 50.73% | 44.13% | D+6.6 | D |
97 | 46.85% | 51.64% | R+4.8 | 47.31% | 46.94% | D+0.4 | R |
98 | 59.53% | 39.10% | D+20.4 | 58.02% | 36.87% | D+21.2 | D |
99 | 41.40% | 56.65% | R+15.3 | 41.34% | 52.43% | R+11.1 | R |
100 | 37.26% | 60.42% | R+23.2 | 25.75% | 69.57% | R+43.8 | R |
101 | 33.91% | 64.22% | R+30.3 | 28.70% | 65.31% | R+36.6 | R |
102 | 33.32% | 64.74% | R+31.4 | 26.87% | 67.69% | R+40.8 | R |
103 | 67.85% | 28.35% | D+39.5 | 71.56% | 20.92% | D+50.6 | D |
104 | 46.02% | 52.10% | R+6.1 | 42.48% | 52.16% | R+9.7 | R |
105 | 41.33% | 56.81% | R+15.5 | 45.19% | 47.11% | R+1.9 | R |
106 | 29.26% | 68.84% | R+39.6 | 22.90% | 71.51% | R+48.6 | R |
107 | 34.01% | 64.10% | R+30.1 | 22.81% | 72.62% | R+49.8 | R |
108 | 34.28% | 63.51% | R+29.2 | 26.75% | 67.49% | R+40.7 | R |
109 | 27.23% | 70.75% | R+43.5 | 17.21% | 79.13% | R+61.9 | R |
110 | 37.75% | 60.20% | R+22.5 | 27.66% | 67.10% | R+39.4 | R |
111 | 51.31% | 46.13% | D+5.2 | 39.05% | 55.40% | R+16.4 | D |
112 | 48.97% | 48.87% | D+0.1 | 44.35% | 49.85% | R+5.5 | D |
113 | 58.59% | 39.41% | D+19.2 | 53.73% | 41.03% | D+12.7 | D |
114 | 63.89% | 34.84% | D+29.1 | 57.60% | 38.35% | D+19.3 | D |
115 | 43.13% | 53.93% | R+10.8 | 33.20% | 61.29% | R+28.1 | R |
116 | 41.16% | 56.77% | R+15.6 | 29.39% | 66.21% | R+36.8 | D |
117 | 37.92% | 59.99% | R+22.1 | 26.42% | 69.38% | R+43 | R |
118 | 39.86% | 58.03% | R+18.2 | 28.44% | 67.59% | R+39.2 | D |
Total | 57.61% | 40.74% | D+16.9 | 55.96% | 38.85% | D+17.1 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House Illinois District 3
Incumbent Daniel Lipinski defeated Arthur Jones in the general election for U.S. House Illinois District 3 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Daniel Lipinski (D) | 73.0 | 163,053 |
![]() | Arthur Jones (R) | 25.9 | 57,885 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 1.1 | 2,396 |
Total votes: 223,334 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Mat Tomkowiak (Independent)
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 3
Incumbent Daniel Lipinski defeated Marie Newman in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 3 on March 20, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Daniel Lipinski | 51.1 | 48,675 |
![]() | Marie Newman | 48.9 | 46,530 |
Total votes: 95,205 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 3
Arthur Jones advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 3 on March 20, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Arthur Jones | 100.0 | 20,681 |
Total votes: 20,681 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Democratic. Incumbent Daniel Lipinski (D) was unopposed in the general election on November 8, 2016, as the only Republican to file, Arthur Jones, was removed from the ballot prior to the primary. Lipinski also faced no opposition in the Democratic primary on March 15, 2016.[45][46]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
100% | 225,320 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0% | 91 | |
Total Votes | 225,411 | |||
Source: Illinois State Board of Elections |
2014
The 3rd Congressional District of Illinois held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 4, 2014. Daniel Lipinski (D) defeated Sharon Brannigan (R) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
64.6% | 116,764 | |
Republican | Sharon Brannigan | 35.4% | 64,091 | |
Total Votes | 180,855 | |||
Source: Illinois State Board of Elections Official Results |
2012
The 3rd Congressional District of Illinois held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 6, 2012. Incumbent Daniel Lipinski won re-election in the district.[47]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | ![]() |
68.5% | 168,738 | |
Republican | Richard Grabowski | 31.5% | 77,653 | |
Total Votes | 246,391 | |||
Source: Illinois Board of Elections "2012 General Election Official Vote Totals" |
2010
On November 2, 2010, Daniel Lipinski won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Michael A. Bendas (R) and Laurel Lambert Schmidt (G) in the general election.[48]
State profile
- See also: Illinois and Illinois elections, 2020
Partisan data
The information in this section was current as of March 5, 2020.
Presidential voting pattern
- Illinois voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2018 elections, the two U.S. senators from Illinois were Democrats.
- Illinois had 13 Democratic and five Republican U.S. representatives.
State executives
- Democrats held six of 13 state executive offices. The Illinois Commerce Commission was composed of individuals with different affiliations. Elections for the other six offices were nonpartisan.
- Illinois' governor was Democrat J.B. Pritzker.
State legislature
- Democrats had a veto-proof majority in the Illinois State Senate of 40 members to Republicans' 19 members.
- Democrats had a veto-proof majority in the Illinois House of Representatives of 74 members to Republicans' 44 members.
Illinois Party Control: 1992-2025
Nineteen years of Democratic trifectas • Two years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
Senate | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
House | D | D | D | R | R | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D |
|
|
Demographic data for Illinois | ||
---|---|---|
Illinois | U.S. | |
Total population: | 12,839,047 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 55,519 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 72.3% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 14.3% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 5% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.2% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.2% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 16.5% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 87.9% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 32.3% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $57,574 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 16.8% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Illinois. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
See also
- Illinois' 3rd Congressional District election, 2020 (March 17 Republican primary)
- Illinois' 3rd Congressional District election, 2020
- United States House elections in Illinois, 2020 (March 17 Democratic primaries)
- United States House elections in Illinois, 2020 (March 17 Republican primaries)
- United States House Democratic Party primaries, 2020
- United States House Republican Party primaries, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
- U.S. House battlegrounds, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 YouTube, "IL-03: Dan Lipinski ad," February 21, 2020
- ↑ Facebook, "Dan Lipinski for Congress on March 5, 2020," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Marie Newman 2020 campaign website, "Meet Marie," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Chicago Tribune, "Who is Marie Newman, Democratic candidate for 3rd Congressional District?" February 19, 2020
- ↑ YouTube, "A Clear Choice for IL03," March 4, 2020
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on October 17, 2019
- ↑ Chicago Sun-Times, "Challenger Newman sees gain in Lipinski’s pain — third candidate ‘stunned’ by bad blood," January 22, 2020
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Federal Election Commission, "Illinois - House District 03," accessed March 14, 2020 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "yearend" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ The Washington Post, "Gillibrand backs challenger to antiabortion House Democrat," April 16, 2019
- ↑ In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ Chicago Tribune, "Editorial: Endorsements for the U.S. House: Lipinski, Fricilone, Emmons Jr. and Kelly," February 14, 2020
- ↑ 12.00 12.01 12.02 12.03 12.04 12.05 12.06 12.07 12.08 12.09 12.10 12.11 12.12 12.13 12.14 12.15 12.16 12.17 12.18 12.19 12.20 12.21 12.22 12.23 12.24 12.25 12.26 12.27 12.28 12.29 12.30 12.31 12.32 12.33 12.34 12.35 12.36 12.37 12.38 12.39 12.40 12.41 12.42 12.43 12.44 12.45 12.46 12.47 12.48 12.49 12.50 12.51 12.52 12.53 12.54 12.55 12.56 12.57 12.58 12.59 12.60 12.61 12.62 12.63 Marie Newman 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Daily Kos, "We're endorsing two fantastic progressive women to help boot out the lousiest Democrats in Congress," November 18, 2019
- ↑ Gazette Chicago, "Endorsements 2020," accessed March 9, 2020
- ↑ Facebook, "Marie Newman on February 20, 2020," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Facebook, "Worth Township Democratic Organization on March 2, 2020," accessed March 3, 2020
- ↑ 17.00 17.01 17.02 17.03 17.04 17.05 17.06 17.07 17.08 17.09 17.10 17.11 17.12 17.13 17.14 17.15 Daniel Lipinski 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Facebook, "Marie Newman on March 10, 2020," accessed March 10, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Friends of Intelligent Democracy PAC on March 5, 2020," accessed March 8, 2020
- ↑ Chicago Tribune, "In 3rd Congressional District Democratic primary forum, challenger Marie Newman says time is up for Mike Madigan as party chairman; U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinski says that’s up to party members," March 6, 2020
- ↑ WTTW, "Candidate Forum: US Rep. Dan Lipinski Faces 3 Primary Challengers," March 10, 2020
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Susan B. Anthony List, "Women Speak Out PAC Launches Five-Figure Campaign to Support Pro-life Champion Rep. Dan Lipinski," March 6, 2020
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Politico, "Illinois Playbook," February 25, 2020
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Politico, "Morning Score," February 25, 2020
- ↑ Riverside Brookfield Landmark, "Congressional hopefuls slam no-show frontrunners," February 25, 2020
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Dan Lipinski 2020 campaign website, “Issues,” accessed March 3, 2020
- ↑ Rush Darwish 2020 campaign website, "The Issues," accessed March 3, 2020
- ↑ Marie Newman 2020 campaign website, "The Issues," accessed March 4, 2020
- ↑ Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Outside Spending," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Total Outside Spending by Election Cycle, All Groups," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ National Review.com, "Why the Media Hate Super PACs," November 6, 2015
- ↑ Illinois General Assembly, "Illinois Compiled Statutes 10 ILCS 5/7-41," accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "State Primary Election Types," accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Illinois State Board of Elections, "Candidate List," accessed November 30, 2015
- ↑ The New York Times, "Illinois Primary Results," March 15, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "2012 Election Map, Illinois"
- ↑ U.S. Congress House Clerk, "Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 2, 2010," accessed March 28, 2013
- ↑ Encyclopedia.com, "Illinois," accessed May 7, 2019