Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2026

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



2024
Illinois' 9th Congressional District
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Democratic primary
Republican primary
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: November 3, 2025
Primary: March 17, 2026
General: November 3, 2026
How to vote
Poll times:

6 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Voting in Illinois

Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Solid Democratic
DDHQ and The Hill: Pending
Inside Elections: Solid Democratic
Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Democratic
Ballotpedia analysis
U.S. Senate battlegrounds
U.S. House battlegrounds
Federal and state primary competitiveness
Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026
See also
Illinois' 9th Congressional District
U.S. Senate1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th11th12th13th14th15th16th17th
Illinois elections, 2026
U.S. Congress elections, 2026
U.S. Senate elections, 2026
U.S. House elections, 2026

All U.S. House districts, including the 9th Congressional District of Illinois, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. The primary is March 17, 2026. The filing deadline is November 3, 2025. For more information about the primaries in this election, click on the links below:

Candidates and election results

Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:

  • Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
  • Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies

Note: At this time, Ballotpedia is combining all declared candidates for this election into one list under a general election heading. As primary election dates are published, this information will be updated to separate general election candidates from primary candidates as appropriate.

General election

The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.

General election for U.S. House Illinois District 9

The following candidates are running in the general election for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on November 3, 2026.


Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Candidate profiles

This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.

Image of Kat Abughazaleh

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "My name is Kat Abughazaleh. I'm a researcher and journalist who has devoted my career to fighting the far-right. I've worked for outlets like Media Matters, Mother Jones, and Zeteo News, but I'm probably best known for my video explainers about Fox News and right-wing media on my personal social media accounts. I decided to run for Congress because I don't think Democrats are doing enough to stand against fascism, to make billionaires pay their fair share, and to protect the working class. And unfortunately, our leadership in the House of Representatives refuses to acknowledge the true impact that the far-right, the Internet, and working class struggles have on our country — and that's part of the reason Democrats keep losing elections. I'm trying to run a progressive grassroots campaign that I can be proud of. I'm not taking a cent of corporate cash and I'm trying to spend our money in ways that help people now, rather than waiting to make a difference in my community until I'm elected. By making our events engaging, centered around mutual aid, and accessible to everyone no matter their income, my campaign is showing our values rather than providing lip service with nothing to show for it. In my spare time, I like reading space operas, doing crafts like embroidery and knitting with my friends, and hanging out with my partner, Ben, and our cat, Heater."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


ANTI-AUTHORITARIANISM Donald Trump, tech billionaires, and the Republican Party have banded together to break this country. Their vision is fascist, one of a militarized country where only a few dozen rich men have a seat at the table. We will not and cannot let them win. The Democratic strategy of cowering to this administration is not only morally reprehensible but it also won't work. Every authoritarian movement has shown us the only way to stand up to fascism is loudly, proudly, and every single day. I have been doing that for my entire career thus far, and I won't stop in Congress. I will speak out, use what I have to slow this administration wherever possible. And I will make sure my constituents know they are not alone.


BASIC EXISTENCE My bold vision is that every American should be able to afford housing, healthcare, and groceries with money left over to save and spend (crazy, right?). This should be the lowest bar possible and it is for many of our peer countries. But in the United States, that idea is considered by many, particularly the richest and most powerful, to be a pipe dream. Our existence isn't merely a means of profit for the richest people in society. These ideas shouldn't be controversial and are at the very core of my campaign. We're often told that it's a lot more complicated than we think but it doesn't have to be. We deserve to thrive, not just survive — and every political leader should work towards that goal.


DEMOCRATIC REFORM Our democracy is broken. Our current system functions too much on greed, rewards stagnation, and disincentivizes change. That's why we need a serious overhaul of our electoral system. We must overturn the Supreme Court's egregious Citizens United ruling and depoliticize the Court by instituting a binding code of ethics and 18-year term limits. Congress also must be overhauled. We need to talk seriously about multi-member districts, expanding the House, and ranked-choice voting, as well as federal rules against gerrymandering. And as soon as possible, there must be a federal ban on members of Congress trading individual stocks, regulations against lobbying after leaving office, and enforcement of both.

Image of Phil Andrew

WebsiteFacebookTwitter

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I’m Phil Andrew and I’m running for Congress to bring principled, compassionate and mission-driven leadership to Illinois’ 9th District. I grew up here. I am a survivor of gun violence, which informed my leap into public service as an FBI special agent and hostage negotiator. I remain determined to turn that tragedy into something positive to keep all our communities safe. My experience has taught me about resilience and the power of teamwork and being a force for what’s right, good and just in our community. Meaningful change starts with listening. I have spent my life working to solve problems and bring people together. Real leadership isn’t about noise; it’s about results. It’s about living your values in service of others. Protecting our rights and creating opportunities that help every family thrive. Enough is enough. Our nation is in crisis. We’re building a team right here in District 9—ready to work together and deliver real results. From advancing gun safety to protecting our personal rights, to ensuring affordable healthcare and expanding access to good-paying jobs, our district can lead the way. Together, we’ll drive the forward-thinking solutions our community, our democracy, and our country need—now and for the future. We are ready for the fight. Join our team!"


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


Principled Leadership. We’ve seen the cost of chaos. It’s time to stop the bleeding and restore strategic, principled leadership. Phil Andrew brings integrity, clarity, and real crisis-tested experience to meet the moment and lead us forward—together.


Gun Violence Prevention and Public Safety. Every family deserves to feel safe. Phil will advance comprehensive, evidence-based, and holistic public safety strategies that go beyond slogans and deliver real results—honoring victims with action, not rhetoric.


Economic Security and Opportunity. Phil believes in a fair economy where everyone has the opportunity to earn, grow, and contribute. He’ll fight for smart policies and collaborative implementation that create sustainable economic growth and jobs, support small businesses, innovation, climate resilience, healthcare coverage, and reflect the real cost of living, educating and supporting families in our district.

Image of Justin Ford

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I’m Justin Ford, a lifelong advocate for working people and a Democratic candidate for U.S. Congress in Illinois’s 9th District. I was born in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula to a teacher and a judge, raised with a strong sense of fairness, dignity, and public service. I’ve lived in Andersonville for over a decade, raised two sons, and worked to protect people’s health, safety, and rights on the job. I’ve helped organize workers, supported unions, and built a career in public health as a Certified Industrial Hygienist—focusing on protecting people in workplaces, schools, hospitals, and neighborhoods across the country. I’m running because too many working families are being left behind while corporate power grows unchecked. It’s time for bold structural reforms, like a four-day work week, real climate action, and rebuilding the labor movement, to build an economy and a democracy that actually work for all of us"


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


A four-day work week isn’t just possible—it’s necessary. It’s time to give people their time back, boost productivity, and build an economy that works for working families.


Real climate action creates jobs. We need to invest in a carbon-negative, storm-resilient future; powered by union labor, clean energy, and smart public infrastructure.


Rebuild the labor movement to rebuild the middle class. That means stronger unions, higher wages, safer workplaces, and policies that put people—not corporations—at the center of our economy.

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!

WebsiteTwitter

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I’m Tamika La’Shon Hill, a systems-driven reformer, grassroots organizer, and proud Chicagoan running for the U.S. House of Representatives in Illinois’ 9th District. My journey—from federal candidate to President of the Rights Of Americans Association National Committee—has been defined by a relentless commitment to transparency, accountability, and inclusive civic empowerment. I specialize in reverse-engineering complex compliance systems and building resilient campaign infrastructure that withstands scrutiny and uplifts communities. Whether I’m designing donor vetting dashboards, forensic audit protocols, or signature collection frameworks, my focus is always on operational clarity and legacy-building. I’m organizing this campaign remotely from a nursing home, turning personal adversity into a rallying point for innovation and grassroots action. My lived experience fuels my fight for accessible governance, disability rights, and economic justice. I believe every voter deserves a representative who not only understands the system—but can redesign it to work for everyone. This campaign isn’t just about winning a seat. It’s about setting new standards for how campaigns are run, how communities are engaged, and how leadership is passed on with dignity and purpose."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


1. Transparency isn’t optional—it’s foundational. I’m committed to building a campaign that sets a new standard for public accountability. From donor vetting dashboards to audit-resilient compliance frameworks, I believe voters deserve full clarity on how campaigns operate, raise funds, and make decisions. I don’t just talk about transparency—I operationalize it.


2. Grassroots power can overcome any barrier. I’m organizing this campaign remotely from a nursing home, proving that physical limitations don’t limit civic leadership. By mobilizing volunteers, leveraging digital outreach, and designing inclusive systems, I’m showing that real representation starts with real people—wherever they are.


3. Legacy matters. This campaign is about more than one election cycle. I’m building infrastructure that future candidates can inherit, stress-test, and improve. Whether it’s signature collection protocols, governance matrices, or community engagement tools, I’m laying the groundwork for lasting civic empowerment in Illinois’ 9th District and beyond.

Image of Bethany Johnson

Website

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I came to this district as a trans youth living out of my van, looking for safety and a future. I built a life and career here, becoming the first trans woman to play roller derby in Chicago. After some time away traveling the country and completing my college degree, I returned five years ago with my husband - because we knew this was where we wanted to build our life together. I was forced to drop out of college in my early 20s when my parents discovered I was trans. But in 2016, I returned to Springfield, Missouri, and earned my Bachelor of Science in Theatre with a minor in Computer Science. I was told it couldn’t be done in a year, but I proved them wrong. During that time, I also fought for LGBTQ+ rights in Springfield, and later became the Data Manager for Senator Angus King’s 2018 re-election campaign. Since then, I’ve worked in data engineering and implementation roles, continuing to use my skills to support progressive causes. I’m running because my friends, neighbors, and family know how deeply I care about this district - and because I’m tired of seeing out-of-state influencers and career politicians try to decide what’s best for us. This district deserves someone who understands it firsthand, who’s already been doing the work without chasing clout or power. I’m not here to build a brand, I’m here to fight for the people who live and work in this district. I’ve been doing that for years, not for recognition, but because it’s the right thing to do."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


A constituent's office that works for you, not me. A key duty of a U.S. Representative is helping constituents navigate federal agencies -from Social Security to Veterans' services. I’ll make constituent services a top priority, with an open, accessible office staffed by social workers and at least one attorney. We'll also partner with local law schools to bring in student interns and expand our capacity to serve the community.


Real consequences for masked ICE agents. I believe Federal Law Enforcement must be fully accountable to the public. Officers who hide their identities while performing duties undermine democratic oversight. I will push for Congressional investigations into these practices and work to ensure those who violate public trust face real consequences, including dismissal and loss of pension where appropriate.


More for working families and less for the rich. I believe in higher taxes on the wealthy and a government that focuses less on the wants of the rich and more on the needs of working families, the poor, and the struggling. We need to tax the rich and invest in everyone else.

Image of Sam Polan

WebsiteFacebookTwitter

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "Sam is a Wilmette native and Special Operations Veteran who deployed to the Middle East three times and rose to the rank of Captain in the U.S. Army. He served first with Army Air Defense, before passing one of the military’s most demanding selection processes to become an Airborne-qualified Special Operations Civil Affairs Officer. In Sam’s new role, he learned Arabic and completed multiple deployments with SEAL teams as part of a Joint Special Warfare task force. “I’m running for Congress because I am deeply concerned about the direction this country is headed under the Trump Administration and the failures of our current national Democratic leadership,” said Polan. “More than deeply concerned… I’m angry. I learned early on you don’t leave problems for other people. I don’t know how to bury my head in the sand, or how to sit idly by when Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans threaten our very democracy and all the institutions we hold dear, that I was driven to defend in uniform.” “We are at an inflection point where our Democratic leaders have also failed us… failed to stop the Trump attacks, failed to put up candidates with fresh ideas that excite voters, and failed to provide a clear vision. Democrats need to WIN again. We can’t keep doing the same thing and expecting different results. We need a new generation of leadership that brings not only fresh ideas, but the life experience and ability to get things done.”"


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


Defend the Constitution and the rule of law


Restore and defend civil liberties


Building an equitable path to the American Dream

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I’ve taught public school in New York City with Teach for America, prosecuted corporate crimes in President Obama’s Justice Department, and led strategy for major products at Microsoft. I’ve always been driven by a belief that things can be better - and an impatience to get there. Since November, that impatience has been growing. I’ve watched the wreckage of this administration pile up, and have been waiting for the Democratic Party–my party since before I could vote–to lead. Now, I'm running for Congress because it’s clear that we need new leadership and a new approach. That’s why I’m offering a clear vision for the future, focused on renewing the American dream, building the future, and fighting for freedom–all deeply informed by my experience. I was born and raised in the Chicago area and now live in Evanston with my wife and our sons. School and work have taken me around the country, but this has always been home. Our country desperately needs leadership now, and I know our district is up to the challenge."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


In the last century, America led the world. We beat back autocrats, built a thriving middle class, invented new industries, and advanced civil rights. Now, many Americans feel we’ve lost our way. Those triumphs are a distant memory, and our sense of shared purpose is fading. We need leaders who can meet this moment with ambition and clarity, but Democrats haven’t delivered. We’ve paid the price with voters and allowed a disastrous era to continue. We urgently need a new path. If we cling to ideas that have failed for a decade, we’ll keep losing. If we offer a vision for a stronger, fairer, and freer nation, we can inspire the country and build a winning majority. That vision is a New American Century. America can lead again.


We Must: Reverse this administration’s attacks on education and preserve funding for public schools Invest in alternative skill pathways, like flexible degree programs and certificates, and give employers incentives to hire candidates who use them Invest in research and programs to give all students AI literacy and readiness End tariffs and other policies that needlessly drive up costs Reform our tax code to shift the burden off middle-class families Reduce barriers to increasing supply of housing and other critical necessities Reverse cruel cuts to Medicaid, strengthen and stabilize Social Security, and pass Medicare for All Advance policies like paid parental leave that help Americans take care of themselves and their loved ones


We Must: Reinstate and expand federal research funding, and protect science from politics Invest in critical and emerging industries to fuel America’s competitiveness Give scientists, inventors, and entrepreneurs from all over the world the incentive to discover and build in America End restrictive trade practices that hobble the American economy Strengthen trade relationships to ensure American companies have access to the world’s markets Vigorously enforce antitrust law to drive competition and give small and innovative companies a chance to win Experiment with new ways for the public to participate in steering innovation, particularly in high-stakes fields like AI

Image of Mark Su

WebsiteFacebookYouTube

Party: Republican Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: None

Submitted Biography "I am father, husband, and long time community contributor. I was a student, a blue collar worker, a small business owner before, and I am working class people in past 20 years working as an computer software engineer and IT consultant. I also create media company to do news and video media for 12 years. I have extensive professional experience in several industry, include worked at Tech company Motorola as a software engineer, Abbott Laboratories , Bank of American as a IT consultant. Over past dozens of years, I work as a media editor , journalist to closely work with communities, city, state and other place, include promote policy, report events, help community to solve issues , etc. With my media platform , I did lot political comments, support local, state and federal candidates , and promote election. I was also a writer, which publish two books, and thousands of news and comment articles."


Key Messages

To read this candidate's full survey responses, click here.


I am grassroot working class person, I'll fight for all citizens, what ever you are republican, or any other citizens, I will work for you


I am loyal citizens of 9th district which live on this district over last 27 years, I will make this district better, make Illinois better, make American better


I'll represent republican to election, as democratic congress woman in this district near 30 years, it's time to change, from equal opportunity point of view, it's term for republican to be on this congress district. However, I'll work for all people, include republican, democratic and any other citizens. I'll fight for all class, no matter you are blue collar, white collar, business owner, etc. I will fight for issues like high working class medical insurance, community safety, better education systems, strong economy , and more.

Voting information

See also: Voting in Illinois

Ballotpedia will publish the dates and deadlines related to this election as they are made available.

Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses

Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Survey responses from candidates in this race

Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Expand all | Collapse all

ANTI-AUTHORITARIANISM

Donald Trump, tech billionaires, and the Republican Party have banded together to break this country. Their vision is fascist, one of a militarized country where only a few dozen rich men have a seat at the table. We will not and cannot let them win.

The Democratic strategy of cowering to this administration is not only morally reprehensible but it also won't work. Every authoritarian movement has shown us the only way to stand up to fascism is loudly, proudly, and every single day.

I have been doing that for my entire career thus far, and I won't stop in Congress. I will speak out, use what I have to slow this administration wherever possible. And I will make sure my constituents know they are not alone.

BASIC EXISTENCE

My bold vision is that every American should be able to afford housing, healthcare, and groceries with money left over to save and spend (crazy, right?). This should be the lowest bar possible and it is for many of our peer countries. But in the United States, that idea is considered by many, particularly the richest and most powerful, to be a pipe dream.

Our existence isn't merely a means of profit for the richest people in society. These ideas shouldn't be controversial and are at the very core of my campaign. We're often told that it's a lot more complicated than we think but it doesn't have to be. We deserve to thrive, not just survive — and every political leader should work towards that goal.

DEMOCRATIC REFORM

Our democracy is broken. Our current system functions too much on greed, rewards stagnation, and disincentivizes change. That's why we need a serious overhaul of our electoral system.

We must overturn the Supreme Court's egregious Citizens United ruling and depoliticize the Court by instituting a binding code of ethics and 18-year term limits.

Congress also must be overhauled. We need to talk seriously about multi-member districts, expanding the House, and ranked-choice voting, as well as federal rules against gerrymandering. And as soon as possible, there must be a federal ban on members of Congress trading individual stocks, regulations against lobbying after leaving office, and enforcement of both.
Principled Leadership. We’ve seen the cost of chaos. It’s time to stop the bleeding and restore strategic, principled leadership. Phil Andrew brings integrity, clarity, and real crisis-tested experience to meet the moment and lead us forward—together.

Gun Violence Prevention and Public Safety. Every family deserves to feel safe. Phil will advance comprehensive, evidence-based, and holistic public safety strategies that go beyond slogans and deliver real results—honoring victims with action, not rhetoric.

Economic Security and Opportunity. Phil believes in a fair economy where everyone has the opportunity to earn, grow, and contribute. He’ll fight for smart policies and collaborative implementation that create sustainable economic growth and jobs, support small businesses, innovation, climate resilience, healthcare coverage, and reflect the real cost of living, educating and supporting families in our district.
A four-day work week isn’t just possible—it’s necessary. It’s time to give people their time back, boost productivity, and build an economy that works for working families.

Real climate action creates jobs. We need to invest in a carbon-negative, storm-resilient future; powered by union labor, clean energy, and smart public infrastructure.

Rebuild the labor movement to rebuild the middle class. That means stronger unions, higher wages, safer workplaces, and policies that put people—not corporations—at the center of our economy.
1. Transparency isn’t optional—it’s foundational. I’m committed to building a campaign that sets a new standard for public accountability. From donor vetting dashboards to audit-resilient compliance frameworks, I believe voters deserve full clarity on how campaigns operate, raise funds, and make decisions. I don’t just talk about transparency—I operationalize it.

2. Grassroots power can overcome any barrier. I’m organizing this campaign remotely from a nursing home, proving that physical limitations don’t limit civic leadership. By mobilizing volunteers, leveraging digital outreach, and designing inclusive systems, I’m showing that real representation starts with real people—wherever they are.

3. Legacy matters. This campaign is about more than one election cycle. I’m building infrastructure that future candidates can inherit, stress-test, and improve. Whether it’s signature collection protocols, governance matrices, or community engagement tools, I’m laying the groundwork for lasting civic empowerment in Illinois’ 9th District and beyond.
A constituent's office that works for you, not me.

A key duty of a U.S. Representative is helping constituents navigate federal agencies -from Social Security to Veterans' services. I’ll make constituent services a top priority, with an open, accessible office staffed by social workers and at least one attorney. We'll also partner with local law schools to bring in student interns and expand our capacity to serve the community.

Real consequences for masked ICE agents.

I believe Federal Law Enforcement must be fully accountable to the public. Officers who hide their identities while performing duties undermine democratic oversight. I will push for Congressional investigations into these practices and work to ensure those who violate public trust face real consequences, including dismissal and loss of pension where appropriate.

More for working families and less for the rich.

I believe in higher taxes on the wealthy and a government that focuses less on the wants of the rich and more on the needs of working families, the poor, and the struggling. We need to tax the rich and invest in everyone else.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

Defend the Constitution and the rule of law

Restore and defend civil liberties

Building an equitable path to the American Dream
In the last century, America led the world. We beat back autocrats, built a thriving middle class, invented new industries, and advanced civil rights. Now, many Americans feel we’ve lost our way. Those triumphs are a distant memory, and our sense of shared purpose is fading.

We need leaders who can meet this moment with ambition and clarity, but Democrats haven’t delivered. We’ve paid the price with voters and allowed a disastrous era to continue.

We urgently need a new path. If we cling to ideas that have failed for a decade, we’ll keep losing. If we offer a vision for a stronger, fairer, and freer nation, we can inspire the country and build a winning majority.

That vision is a New American Century. America can lead again.

We Must:

Reverse this administration’s attacks on education and preserve funding for public schools

Invest in alternative skill pathways, like flexible degree programs and certificates, and give employers incentives to hire candidates who use them

Invest in research and programs to give all students AI literacy and readiness

End tariffs and other policies that needlessly drive up costs

Reform our tax code to shift the burden off middle-class families

Reduce barriers to increasing supply of housing and other critical necessities

Reverse cruel cuts to Medicaid, strengthen and stabilize Social Security, and pass Medicare for All

Advance policies like paid parental leave that help Americans take care of themselves and their loved ones

We Must:

Reinstate and expand federal research funding, and protect science from politics

Invest in critical and emerging industries to fuel America’s competitiveness

Give scientists, inventors, and entrepreneurs from all over the world the incentive to discover and build in America

End restrictive trade practices that hobble the American economy

Strengthen trade relationships to ensure American companies have access to the world’s markets

Vigorously enforce antitrust law to drive competition and give small and innovative companies a chance to win

Experiment with new ways for the public to participate in steering innovation, particularly in high-stakes fields like AI
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

I am grassroot working class person, I'll fight for all citizens, what ever you are republican, or any other citizens, I will work for you

I am loyal citizens of 9th district which live on this district over last 27 years, I will make this district better, make Illinois better, make American better

I'll represent republican to election, as democratic congress woman in this district near 30 years, it's time to change, from equal opportunity point of view, it's term for republican to be on this congress district. However, I'll work for all people, include republican, democratic and any other citizens. I'll fight for all class, no matter you are blue collar, white collar, business owner, etc. I will fight for issues like high working class medical insurance, community safety, better education systems, strong economy , and more.
Public policy should be about helping others and I'm particularly passionate and interested about policies that serve communities to the fullest extent they can: climate action that also provides jobs and public transportation, reproductive care access that ensures we also research and decrease our maternal mortality rates, educational funding that allows our students of all levels to succeed and thrive while also feeding them. There are so many avenues we can take to make this country better, and the best part is that, when done correctly, many of them have greater impacts than anyone expected in the first place.
Economic Security, Gun Violence Prevention, , Protecting Democracy, and Protecting Our Civil Rights
I’m passionate about public policy that puts working people first. As a public health professional, I’ve spent my career protecting people’s health and safety on the job. I care deeply about labor rights, workplace protections, and economic policies that return time, power, and dignity to everyday people, like the four-day work week.

I’m also committed to bold climate policy, leveraging our amazing American workforce, and rooted in justice, resilience, and job creation.

And we must strengthen democracy by protecting voting rights, curbing big money, and ensuring that government works for the many, not just the powerful few.
I’m passionate about public policy that strengthens transparency, accessibility, and civic empowerment. I advocate for campaign finance reform that embeds audit resilience and donor accountability into every layer of fundraising. I champion disability rights and inclusive governance—organizing my campaign remotely from a nursing home has shown me how policy must evolve to meet people where they are. I also focus on legacy-building: designing systems and tools that future leaders can inherit, stress-test, and improve. My mission is to make government work for everyday people by demystifying its processes and empowering communities to lead.
I’m passionate about ensuring real people get more from their government - through policies that prioritize public health, economic fairness, and strong civil rights protections. I believe government should work for everyone, especially those who’ve been underserved or ignored. From healthcare access to housing justice, reproductive freedom, and LGBTQ+ rights, I support policies that protect people’s dignity and expand opportunity.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

Expanding healthcare access, protecting the rule of law, restoring civil liberties, codifying abortion and marriage equality rights in the constitution, rebuilding the Democratic party from the ground up, and stopping Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans.
Renewing the American Dream by expanding economic growth, making life more affordable, and taking care of our families and communities.

Building the Future by investing in research and innovation, creating an open economy, and modernizing regulation for the 21st century.

Fighting for Freedom by securing American democracy, strengthening civil and human rights, and defending democracy around the world.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Science and Tech, public safety, internal policy, education, Social issues, industry development, etc
I look up to Frances Perkins, the first woman to serve in a U.S. Cabinet and the driving force behind many of the labor protections we now take for granted, such as Social Security, the 40-hour work week, child labor laws, and workplace safety standards.

She didn’t just believe in good policy; she believed in building institutions that protect people, especially those most likely to be exploited or left behind. Her work was grounded in both compassion and structural change, and she used her position not for personal power but to fight for workers and families who had none.

I see her legacy as unfinished. We’re long overdue for a new era of bold labor policy, one that recognizes the dignity of all work and adapts to the challenges of today, from gig exploitation to climate resilience. I hope to carry that spirit forward, with the same clarity of purpose and courage to act.
I admire visionaries who build systems that outlast them—people who don’t just lead, but architect legacies. Folks like Shirley Chisholm, who didn’t wait for permission to run, and instead carved out a blueprint for generations of women and marginalized voices to follow. Or someone like Ella Baker, who believed in grassroots power and decentralized leadership long before it was trendy. Their brilliance wasn’t just in what they said—it was in how they operationalized justice.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Trump's election experience inspired me to run this congress race
I'd point to Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler. Beyond being an incredible book about the worst conditions — conditions we might face as climate change accelerates and governments abandon the most vulnerable in society — it also revolves around hope, specifically hope rooted in change.

The first verse from the Earthseed philosophy outlined in Parable of the Sower is written in the front of my planner: "All that you touch / You Change. / All that you Change / Changes you. / The only lasting truth / Is Change."

Life can be hard. Circumstances can be unfair. But the world will change for better or for worse, whether we want it to or not. And it's our responsibility to not only welcome but also usher in change to make a world we want to see.
I’d point them to the Garth Brooks song We Shall Be Free. It’s not a policy paper or a political memoir—but it captures the heart of what I believe in: dignity, equality, freedom, and community. The lyrics speak to a world where no one is judged for who they are, where basic needs are met, and where we all have the chance to live free from fear. It’s about building something better—not just for ourselves, but for the people who’ve been pushed aside or left behind. That spirit of inclusion and shared responsibility is at the core of my political philosophy.
When I left Springfield, MO in 2003 it was right after the Buffy the Vampire Slayer finale. I understand this may seem corny - and no, I'm not joking when I say that the speech Buffy gives in the final episode has been an important part of my life since then:

"I hate this. I hate being here. I hate that you have to be here. I hate that there's evil and that I was chosen to fight it. I wish a whole lot of the time that I hadn't been. I know a lot of you wish I hadn't been, either. This isn't about wishes. This is about choices. I believe we can beat this evil. Not when it comes. Not when its army is ready. Now. Tomorrow morning, I'm opening the seal. I'm going down into the Hellmouth and I am finishing this once and for all. Right now, you're asking yourself what makes this different. What makes us anything more than a bunch of girls being picked off one by one? It's true. None of you have the power that Faith and I do.

So here's the part where you make a choice. What if you could have that power, now? In every generation, one Slayer is born, because a bunch of men who died thousands of years ago made up that rule. They were powerful men. This woman is more powerful than all of them combined. So I say we change the rule.... From now on, every girl in the world who might be a Slayer, will be a Slayer. Every girl who could have the power, will have the power. Can stand up, will stand up. Slayers, every one of us. Make your choice. Are you ready to be strong?"

Power is not to be hoarded, it is to be shared. You can't stand around and think that there is one person that is going to save you. You have to get up and you have to save yourself and while you're doing that you have to save other people too, you have to stand up and fight for other people too - because that is what you're here to do.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Trump's book "The way to success"
Empathy and dedication. If you're asking to represent people, it is your responsibility to take your job seriously even when it is difficult. Empathy is a muscle you have to continually flex to maintain. That means returning to your district as often as you can, talking to as many of your constituents as you can (and not just the ones who donate), and reminding yourself that your elected office is a job and a privilege, not something you are entitled to.
We’ve seen the cost of chaos. It’s time to stop the bleeding and restore strategic, principled leadership. Phil Andrew brings integrity, clarity, and real crisis-tested experience to meet the moment and lead us forward—together.
First, every elected official must genuinely care about the people they represent. That means listening more than they talk, staying grounded in the realities of working families, and having the courage to take on powerful interests—even when it’s not politically convenient. Public service only matters if it’s rooted in compassion, humility, and a deep sense of responsibility to others. Second, they need to be able to deliver. Good intentions aren’t enough—we need leaders who can turn values into action and ideas into tangible results. That means understanding how systems work, building coalitions, and doing the hard, unglamorous work of governing. Caring without competence can’t change lives—but competence without caring leads to policies that leave people behind. We need both.
🧭 Integrity and Transparency

Upholding ethical standards in every decision.

Making campaign finances, policy positions, and governance processes fully accessible to the public.

🧠 Competence and Clarity Understanding the systems they’re elected to oversee—and being able to explain them clearly.

Designing solutions that are not just visionary but operationally sound.

🫱🏽‍🫲🏿 Responsiveness and Accessibility Listening to constituents, especially those historically excluded.

Creating channels for feedback, participation, and real-time accountability.

🛠️ Resilience and Adaptability Navigating challenges with creativity and grit.

Turning obstacles into opportunities for reform and empowerment.

🧬 Legacy-Minded Leadership Building infrastructure that future leaders can inherit and improve.

Prioritizing long-term impact over short-term optics.
A servants heart and a fighter's hands. You're not going to understand everyone, but you damn sure better work for them. Because this is a representative Democracy.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

Integrity and vision.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

A elected official should a positive, open mind, and love to serve public service. To be elected official, you must have above average high vision on most of thing, like district development, social issues, and national policies. A elected official must love his district, love state, love this country, he must be a long time loyal citizen and welling to contribute all talent, experience and other to the district. A elected official must be smart, very knowledge in most areas and topics. A official should work for all people, whatever they are republican, democratic, and other people. A official should make right decision on all work, make community united.
I'm very firm in following my own moral code, even to my own detriment — personally or financially. I've always struggled to understand how politicians are willing to compromise their beliefs, especially when it comes to others' basic dignity. It's the wrong thing to do, but also... it's just embarrassing. Have some dignity, man.
I grew up in a small rural town where we learned that people are precious and no one should be written off. It didn’t matter what your politics were—what mattered was whether you could get things done. Get the streets plowed. Help a neighbor. Deliver real results. That grounded, no-nonsense approach still guides me today.

I bring a rare mix of real-world experience, practical problem-solving, and deep care for the people I serve. I’ve built a career protecting workers and communities, not from behind a desk, but out in the field, making sure our workplaces, schools, and neighborhoods are safe.

I know how to listen, how to organize, and how to get results. Whether it was helping unionize grad workers at UIC or protecting public health during the pandemic, I’ve always believed in showing up, sticking with the hard problems, and putting people first.

I’m not running for office because I need a title. I’m running because I already do the work, and I know we can do it better with the right leadership in Washington.
I get to the point.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

High educated, over 40 years job experience in multiply industry. Passion on political and social work.
Elected officials have a responsibility to ensure they are representing their constituents, even the ones who didn't vote for them. This doesn't mean compromising your own values or compromising on every basic premise. But it does mean defending your district, ensuring constituent services are receptive and accessible, ensuring that you communicate as transparently and effectively as possible, and working tirelessly to find common ground among your community. This means being open about your beliefs and your campaign's finances, answering questions and not shying away from criticism, and actually showing up to your job — the thing you were elected to do.
The job of a member of Congress is threefold: to serve, to legislate, and to lead.

First and foremost, elected officials must show up for their constituents, not just in election years, but every single day. That means helping people navigate federal programs, cutting through red tape, and responding quickly and personally when folks need help. In a time when trust in government is low, good constituent service isn’t a side duty, it’s a lifeline.

Second, this office is a lawmaking role. We need members of Congress who understand policy, who can write and pass legislation that actually improves people’s lives, and who aren’t afraid to take tough votes. That includes fighting for a four-day work week, climate resilience, and a fairer economy that works for everyone—not just the wealthy and well-connected.

Finally, members of Congress have a responsibility to lead in a moment of real crisis. The far-right movement is gaining power by sowing division, rolling back rights, and attacking the very foundations of our democracy. We can’t meet that threat with business-as-usual politics. We need bold, principled leadership that inspires people to believe in what government can be and brings working people back into the center of power.
An elected representative in Congress must serve as both a steward of public trust and an architect of systemic change. The core responsibilities include:

Legislating with clarity and integrity: Crafting laws that reflect the needs of constituents, while ensuring transparency in how those laws are developed, debated, and passed.

Oversight and accountability: Monitoring federal agencies, budgets, and executive actions to ensure ethical governance and fiscal responsibility.

Constituent advocacy: Listening to and elevating the voices of the district—especially those historically marginalized—and translating their concerns into actionable policy.

Infrastructure-building: Designing systems that future leaders can inherit, improve, and use to serve the public more effectively. This includes compliance protocols, outreach frameworks, and legacy tools that reinforce resilience and transparency.

Bridge-building: Collaborating across sectors and ideologies to solve problems, not just score political points. The role demands both principled leadership and strategic coalition-building.
To serve the people of their district and do their best to spread the values of their district to the rest of the country.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Solove district issues, social issues, keep district and communities health developed, help citizen on all issues.
I hope that by the end of my life, I have helped others find their voice and power. I think the best thing you can do as a human being is uplift others to the point that they accomplish even bigger and better things than you. We all have our own experiences that shape us and we all think about the world in different ways. How cool would it be to see someone propose and enact solutions that you never even imagined?
I want to leave behind a country that’s stronger, fairer, and freer for my children and grandchildren than the one we have today. A country where dignity is protected, where work is respected, and where the system finally works for the many, not just the powerful few.

There’s a quote I think about often: 'A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.' That’s the kind of leadership I believe in.

I hope people will remember me as a pragmatic leader who helped fix a broken system, not for attention or power, but with a clear eye toward building a better future. Someone who rolled up his sleeves and got to work, not just for today, but for generations to come
I want to leave a legacy of operational clarity, civic empowerment, and institutional resilience. My mission is to build systems that don’t just serve one campaign—but elevate future leaders, communities, and movements. I believe transparency should be a standard, not a slogan. I’ve spent my career designing compliance frameworks, donor vetting tools, and outreach strategies that withstand scrutiny and foster trust. My legacy will be measured not just in votes, but in the infrastructure I leave behind—tools, protocols, and pathways that others can inherit, improve, and use to reclaim their own power. I’m not just running for office; I’m building a blueprint for sustainable, inclusive leadership.
I'd like people to remember me as someone who fights for people with less than her. I think most of the people who know me already do, I hope more people can get to know me as that person as well.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

A first generation Chinese immigrant make congress race, a working class and science engineer run congress
One of my earliest and clearest memories of a major historical event was the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. I was a kid at the time, and, honestly, my first reaction was frustration because it interrupted my Saturday morning cartoons. But as I watched, something changed. I saw people crying, celebrating, and breaking down the wall with their bare hands. That’s when it really hit me: freedom isn’t guaranteed, and some people have to fight to get even a taste of it. I realized how lucky I was to grow up in a country where I had rights others were still struggling for. And I felt, deep down, that we had a responsibility not just to preserve that freedom, but to stand as a lighthouse for others around the world. We’ve lost some of that moral clarity in recent years, but I believe we can reclaim it.
🗓 Event: The Iran Hostage Crisis

📍 Date: Began November 4, 1979 🎂 Your Age: 3 years old

Even if you didn’t grasp the full geopolitical weight at the time, the images of blindfolded Americans, the nightly news countdown (“Day 52… Day 200…”), and the national tension were everywhere. It was one of the first moments that shaped how Americans saw diplomacy, vulnerability, and global conflict. For many future leaders, it planted early questions about justice, accountability, and international power dynamics.
The Challenger Explosion. I was 6 years old. They wheeled a tv into my first grade class so we could watch the launch that day, because "there's a teacher that is an astronaut." I thought they meant she was a teacher at our school, and we all saw it happen live.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

The most impactful historical event that I remember was September 11, 2001. The following day I committed to joining the military.
Fall of the Berlin Wall when I was 6 years old.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Fist historical event is I was admitted to a state best high school among my district, I am the number one to this school, it make me enter best college later.
I was worked as a bartender in college. I worked from open to close six days a week and continued bartending on the weekends even after I started working at Media Matters. Frankly, I've learned more from bartending than any other job I've ever had: social skills, team-building, time management, conflict de-escalation, and so much more. If everyone worked in the service industry for just a few months, I think we'd all be a lot nicer to each other and more considerate of the struggles other people face.
My first job was at a small-town radio station—WNBY in Newberry, Michigan. I started working there as a teenager and stayed for about three years, right up until I left Newberry. It gave me a front-row seat to how local voices and community connections really shape a place. It also taught me responsibility, communication, and how to show up even when the weather, or the equipment, didn’t cooperate. I didn’t know it at the time, but those early lessons stuck with me.
My first job was at Target Stores as a Sales Associate. I didn’t just learn how to stock shelves or ring up purchases—I learned how to listen. I learned how to solve problems on the spot, how to stay calm when the lines were long and the questions were endless. That job taught me that every role matters, and that dignity starts with how we treat each other—whether we’re behind a register or behind a policy. It’s where I first saw systems in action, and where I began to imagine how they could be improved. That mindset has never left me.
My very first job was baling hay as a kid, but I wasn’t strong enough to stack it on the trailer like my big brother. My first real job was as a dishwasher at A&G Steakhouse in Savannah, Missouri. I started on October 13, 1993, when I was 14. My sister worked there as a waitress, and the owner asked me, “Do you work as hard as your sister?” I told him I’d work twice as hard.

Because I was so young, I was legally paid less than minimum wage, I think it was $3.25 an hour. Having a paycheck allowed me to buy my first "real" computer on credit through my mom getting an account at Radio Shack. It was a Tandy Sensation, which changed everything for me.

I worked there for four years. Even after I went to college, Ed, the owner, would treat me to a free meal and some beer money whenever I came home. I think it is my favorite job I have ever had.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

Working at the family business.
I was a dishwasher at Panera for the summer after high school.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

My first is job is as Information Science engineer for 8 years
I already wrote something about Parable of the Sower in my responses here so I'll pick Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel. It was the first book I ever read from my parents' library at home and opened my eyes to complex themes I had never considered. As an adult, I recognize and appreciate how my parents encouraged me to read anything I wanted, even books that some might consider "too mature" for children. Literature is the best way for kids and adolescents to learn about difficult and harsh realities in a safe way. When I read about Ayla's struggles with discrimination, communication, and violence in prehistoric Europe, I sat down with my mother and we talked about them as equals, even though I was around 11-years-old. Because of that, I felt more informed growing up in the world, like I had a better understanding of events around me and issues I may face as a young woman. I can't thank my mom enough for that. Also the amount of research Auel did for that book pre-Internet always impresses me. And if you read it, I bet you'll feel the same way.
It’s hard to pick just one, but two books have stuck with me for very different reasons: "The Giving Tree" by Shel Silverstein and "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.

One of my favorite books is "The Giving Tree". It’s a children’s book, but the message stays with you for life. It’s about selflessness, quiet love, and what it means to give without expecting anything in return. To me, it reflects the kind of leadership we should strive for: rooted in care, service, and a long-term commitment to others. It’s also a reminder that we all have a role to play in supporting the people around us, even if that role changes over time. That message has always stuck with me, especially as a parent and a public servant.

Also, I’ve always had a soft spot for "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy". It’s hilarious, imaginative, and full of unexpected wisdom. Beneath the Absurdity, there’s a quiet message: the universe is chaotic, but kindness, curiosity, and a sense of humor still matter. The line “Don’t panic” has stuck with me for years. It’s simple, but good advice in life and in politics. The book reminds me that we can take our work seriously without taking ourselves too seriously. And that even in a messy,

unpredictable world, we still have the power to do good.
A strong contender would be The Autobiography of Malcolm X as told to Alex Haley. Not just for its historical weight, but for its forensic clarity in tracing transformation, identity, and systemic critique. Malcolm’s evolution—from street hustler to global human rights advocate—is a masterclass in personal reinvention and institutional analysis. Why that book? Because it doesn’t just tell a story—it builds a framework. It shows how lived experience can become political insight, how pain can be repurposed into power, and how legacy is forged through both confrontation and reflection. It’s the kind of book that doesn’t just inspire—it operationalizes purpose.
Where the Red Fern Grows It's a story about responsibility, love and sacrifice. It's one of the first books that a lot of kids read that teaches you about loss, but also what you gain through growing through loss. The story follows a young boy who first works to attain the money to buy two dogs, and then raises them. They become his best friends and their tragic death teaches him the meaning of love and the pain of moving on in life.
Life on the Mississippi by Mark Twain
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Trump's book, it inspire people
I’d go with Commander William Riker from Star Trek: The Next Generation. He’s a leader who knows how to follow and how to command—someone who can take charge when the moment calls for it, but who also values teamwork, trust, and shared mission.

What I admire about Riker is that he’s confident without being arrogant, decisive without being impulsive. He brings heart and strength to tough situations, and he never forgets the human element, even in the middle of a crisis.

In politics, as in space exploration, you need people who are willing to challenge the system when necessary, stay calm under fire, and keep pushing toward something better. That’s the kind of leadership I try to model.
If I could embody any fictional character, I’d choose someone like Oracle—Barbara Gordon’s post-Batgirl persona. Not just because she’s brilliant and resourceful, but because she turns limitation into infrastructure. She’s the unseen architect behind the scenes, coordinating heroes, decoding threats, and building systems that others rely on. She doesn’t need the spotlight to lead—she builds the network that sustains it. That kind of role resonates with me: empowering others, designing resilient frameworks, and making sure the mission doesn’t fall apart when things get tough. It’s strategic, quiet leadership with lasting impact.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

musk
Sir Duke by Stevie Wonder
"The Times They Are A-Changin’ by Bob Dylan.

It’s not just a song—it’s a warning, a promise, and a challenge all at once. Every time I hear it, I’m reminded that we’re living through one of those moments again, where people are demanding real change, and the old ways just aren’t cutting it anymore.

The lyrics have a way of sticking with you, especially if you’re in the fight to help shape what comes next.
If I tell you it will get stuck in my head again. Not falling for that.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

America flag
I have narcolepsy (Type 2), a condition where the brain fails to make a normal amount hypocretin, the chemical that keeps you awake. Throughout high school, I was known for falling asleep in class and, when called on by teachers, able to jolt up, answer a question correctly, and then immediately fall back asleep. I wasn't diagnosed until I was 18, after my car was totaled when I fell asleep at a red light. That diagnosis changed my life as I finally understood why I was so tired and could be medicated for it.

My quality of life has improved drastically since my diagnosis but that also brings its own set of challenges. Navigating our medical and pharmaceutical system with chronic illness is more difficult than I expected and accepting my own limitations has also been a specific type of struggle. Once I was able to make my own schedule after college, I began listening to my body more, learning how I could balance daily life with sleep and how to forgive myself for rough days.

Around half of Americans have some type of chronic illness and many of us can't always afford to get the care and treatment we need. I want to see a country where everyone can have the fortunate experiences I did: the ability to get diagnosed, to get treatment, and to live in a world where your strengths and weaknesses, your capabilities and limitations are not only embraced but accommodated.
I am a survivor of gun violence, which informed my leap into public service as an FBI special agent and hostage negotiator. I remain determined to turn that tragedy into something positive to keep all our communities safe. My experience has taught me about resilience and the power of teamwork and being a force for what’s right, good and just in our community.
One of the more difficult chapters in my life has been navigating a major personal transition while co-parenting two sons, both of whom now live in Europe. Parenting across distance and across cultures is a constant balancing act. It requires patience, humility, and a deep commitment to staying connected—even when the logistics get complicated. There’s no handbook for this kind of thing. But through it, I’ve learned a lot about flexibility, long-term thinking, and putting relationships first. It’s shaped the way I lead and how I think about policy, not just in terms of programs or systems, but in terms of real people doing their best for the people they love.
One of my greatest struggles has been navigating systems that weren’t built for transparency or equity—especially as a woman of color stepping into political leadership. Whether it was running for office, organizing remotely, or building compliance frameworks from scratch, I’ve often had to reverse-engineer protocols that others take for granted. The challenge wasn’t just technical—it was emotional. It meant reclaiming my independence, rebuilding after setbacks, and proving that resilience isn’t just survival—it’s strategy. With every obstacle, I’ve turned struggle into structure, creating tools and pathways that others can use to avoid the same pitfalls. That’s the heart of my campaign: transforming personal struggle into public empowerment.
Knowing when to keep my mouth shut?
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Family, personal development
Unfortunately, most of the unique qualities of the House of Representatives are to its detriment. Partisan gerrymandering runs rampant across the country and has caused the House to lose credibility as an institution and harms Americans who are not being represented as they should. The size of the House is also arbitrarily capped at 435 members, despite our country growing exponentially. This means that elected officials are expected to serve the needs of hundreds of thousands of people across their districts with that number growing every year. Voters deserve national conversations about the benefits and possible disadvantages of House expansion and multi-member districts. The idea behind the House of Representatives — to allot representation proportionately and geographically — is admirable and can still be achieved with proper and effective democratic reforms. But we need to have those conversations and take action to ensure that American democracy is the best it can be.
The House is the closest thing we have to a people’s chamber. Its members are elected every two years, which makes them more accountable to their constituents and more responsive to the country's changing needs. It’s where the most diverse voices in our government come together and where bold ideas can gain traction first. The House has the power of the purse, the power to investigate, and the opportunity to lead on issues that matter most to working families.
🗳️ Direct Representation

Every member is elected directly by constituents in single-member districts.

With 435 seats, it reflects the most granular level of representation in federal government.

⏱️ Short Terms, High Accountability Members serve two-year terms, which keeps them closely tied to their communities and forces regular engagement with voters.

💰 “Power of the Purse” All revenue-raising bills must originate in the House, giving it unique control over federal taxation and spending.

🧩 Committee-Driven Structure The House operates through a vast network of standing and subcommittees, allowing for specialized oversight and rapid legislative development.

🧑🏽‍🤝‍🧑🏿 Demographic Diversity Historically, the House has led the way in increasing representation of women, minorities, and younger leaders.

🔍 Investigative Authority

The House has broad powers to conduct investigations into federal agencies and social issues, often shaping public discourse and policy reform.
The House of Representatives is every citizen’s closest connection to the federal government. Your Representative is the person you turn to when you need help navigating federal agencies, programs, or policies. Unlike more distant branches of government, your House Rep is someone you can meet, speak with, and even influence. They’re meant to be accessible and accountable - a direct line between you and Washington. The House was designed to ensure that everyday people have a voice in the halls of power, and that voice should be heard clearly and often.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

High vision, talent work, al around knowledge, love district, love country, positive, take, responsibility,
Government or political experience can be beneficial but we also need our legislators to have a variety of different backgrounds and experiences. If everyone is just a politician or just a lawyer or business owner, many issues Americans face become to easily overlooked or abstracted. To properly lead such a diverse country, we need a diverse House and Senate with different experiences that reflect that American experience. I'm proud of my experience fighting the far-right and holding their feet to the fire as they stand against the values most Americans hold dear. Government experience can also be a disadvantage. People can become too easily corrupted or complicit in corrupt systems. Likewise, the ivory tower mindset that many people who serve as legislators develop makes them more disconnected from the real issues that people face day-to-day. I'm a former journalist, student, and service worker and those three experiences equip me as well as anyone else to serve in the House of Representatives.
Experience can help, but it depends on the kind of experience. We need fewer career politicians and more leaders who have actually solved real-world problems. I’ve spent my career protecting workers and public health, not climbing political ladders. What matters most is whether someone understands the needs of everyday people and has the skills to turn values into action. Governing should be about service, not seniority.
Yes—with a critical caveat. Prior experience in government or politics can be beneficial when it equips representatives with a deep understanding of legislative processes, regulatory frameworks, and constituent services. It can help them navigate complex systems, build coalitions, and draft policy with precision.

But experience alone isn’t enough. What matters more is how that experience is used. Does it reinforce transparency, accountability, and public trust? Or does it entrench insider privilege and status quo thinking?

I believe that lived experience, community leadership, and systems-level thinking are just as valuable—if not more so—than traditional political résumés. Representatives should be builders, not just insiders. My campaign is proof that operational clarity, grassroots innovation, and remote organizing can rival any conventional path to office. Experience should empower reform, not inhibit it.
Yes, I believe it’s beneficial for representatives to have some experience - especially in organizing, advocacy, or working on a campaign - so they understand how government functions and how to navigate it. But someone who has spent their entire career inside government may lose touch with what everyday people are facing. To truly represent a diverse nation, we need leaders who’ve lived real lives, faced real challenges, and know what it means to be pushed to the margins. Experience matters - but so does perspective.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

yes
Inequality is being exacerbated by some of the most systemic issues in our society right now: lack of accountability for the ultra-rich, climate change, and the right-wing effort to dismantle our social services. If we want to make any progress, we have to address the root of that inequality. We have to acknowledge that prices have risen while wages have stagnated. We have to acknowledge that most people cannot afford a $1,000 emergency expense, much less a home. We have to acknowledge that while solutions might not be easy or fast, we need to strive towards them to not only ensure a better present but a better future as well. The rise of authoritarianism isn't unique to the United States and Trump's unraveling of a decades-old (if admitted flawed) global order puts Americans and the rest of the world at significant risk of economic turmoil, undoable damage to the climate, and even all-out war.
We’re facing a crossroads: rising authoritarianism, deep economic inequality, and a climate crisis that threatens our future. Too many working families are being left behind while corporate power grows unchecked. At the same time, our democracy is being eroded—from voter suppression to unchecked money in politics. We need bold, structural action: protect democratic institutions, fight for an economy that works for working people, and take serious climate action that creates jobs and builds resilience. The next decade will test whether we’re willing to fix what is broken and pave the way for a brighter future.
Over the next decade, the United States faces a convergence of structural challenges that demand bold, transparent, and resilient leadership. First, we must confront the erosion of public trust in institutions—by reforming campaign finance, strengthening electoral integrity, and making governance more accessible and accountable to everyday people.

Second, we face a growing crisis of inequality—economic, racial, and geographic. Policy must evolve to close systemic gaps in healthcare, housing, education, and digital access, especially for disabled and marginalized communities.

Third, we must prepare for generational transitions in leadership, infrastructure, and civic engagement. That means investing in legacy systems, succession planning, and intergenerational empowerment—so that the next wave of leaders inherits tools, not just problems.

These challenges aren’t just political—they’re structural. And they require elected officials who understand how to reverse-engineer broken systems and rebuild them with clarity, equity, and long-term resilience.
One of the greatest challenges facing the United States over the next decade is delivering real accountability for those driving authoritarian and fascist policies that have harmed so many. For too long, the political establishment has urged us to “move on” instead of pursuing justice when people in power - especially on the far right - inflict real harm through illegal actions and violent policies. We must confront and hold accountable those responsible for abuses, including ICE agents who operated with impunity, detaining people while hiding behind masks, and insurrectionists who attempted to overturn our democracy and have faced little or no consequence. A country cannot move forward or find peace when communities know their families were targeted and justice was never served. Accountability is essential to rebuilding trust, protecting democracy, and ensuring true safety for all.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Great challenges for US over the next decade include gun control, industry development, like manufacture restore, race balance, internal competition, political crash, the fight between democratic and republican
No. House terms should be four years as the current two-year length results in many representatives focusing more on their own job security and reelection prospects rather than the job they were elected to do. If House terms were four years, representatives would have more time to focus on actual representation instead of campaign concerns like fundraising. Longer terms would also allow representatives to cast morally upstanding votes instead of being concerned about how special interests will impact an election that's just around the corner.
It would take a constitutional amendment to change the two-year term, and we’ve got bigger challenges to democracy that deserve our focus. From protecting voting rights to getting big money out of politics, there are far more urgent reforms needed to make our system work better for the people.
wo-year terms for U.S. House representatives serve a vital purpose: they keep elected officials closely tied to the people they serve. The short cycle demands constant engagement, responsiveness, and accountability. It’s a built-in check that ensures representatives don’t drift too far from the needs of their district.

That said, the pace can also hinder long-term policymaking and infrastructure-building. Representatives often spend more time campaigning than legislating, which can dilute strategic focus and continuity. For reform-minded leaders like myself, who prioritize legacy systems and operational resilience, the challenge is to build lasting impact within a compressed timeline.

Ultimately, two-year terms are effective when paired with strong institutional memory, transparent governance, and tools that future leaders can inherit and improve. That’s the kind of infrastructure I’m committed to designing—so that every term, no matter how short, leaves a lasting imprint.
Of course. The two-year term is set in the Constitution for a reason. I'm not going to Washington to argue with the ghost of Ben Franklin (though I wish I could party with him) - I’m going to serve my constituents. Frequent elections keep representatives accountable and connected to the people they represent, and I welcome that responsibility.
Yes
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

4 years better
I personally support the idea of term limits and have committed to not serving more than five terms in the House if elected. But I do understand the arguments against them, especially (1) that they could eliminate lawmakers' ability to build policymaking experience and (2) encourage corruption from lawmakers who get in to make money instead of pursuing a career in public service. I'd also consider the option of upper age limits for elected officials, just as we have lower age limits for the House, Senate, and presidency. Similarly, I understand the argument against age limits because of concerns of ageism and depriving voters of democratic options. These are just a few suggestions on how we can ensure that our leadership doesn't stagnate. We live in a fluid and dynamic world, especially now, and we need a legislative body that reflects that. The national discourse should continue to uplift and discuss conversations like these about how to make our government work best for all Americans.
I believe in accountability and fresh leadership—but term limits aren’t a silver bullet. In practice, they can sometimes empower lobbyists and unelected insiders while removing experienced legislators who are still fighting for the people. The real issue is a system that protects incumbents and shuts out challengers. We need fair maps, campaign finance reform, and voting rights protections to make elections truly competitive and responsive to the people.
I support term limits as a tool to promote accountability, prevent entrenched power, and encourage fresh leadership. Public office should be a service—not a career. Term limits help ensure that elected officials remain responsive to their constituents rather than insulated by incumbency. They also create space for new voices, diverse perspectives, and innovative solutions that reflect evolving community needs. That said, term limits alone aren’t enough. We also need transparent campaign finance systems, accessible ballot access, and robust civic education to truly democratize representation. My campaign is committed to building the infrastructure that makes leadership turnover not just possible—but sustainable and empowering.
I support term limits, but they need to be reasonable. Most members of Congress don’t accomplish much in their first term because they’re focused on building relationships and learning how to navigate the institution. Term limits should allow enough time for representatives to gain experience and be effective, while still preventing the kind of entrenched political power that disconnects lawmakers from the people they serve.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Congress should change the term limit to like max tern no more than 4 term to promote equal opportunities, and make change on district
I look up to Paul Simon, who represented Illinois in both the U.S. House and Senate. He was known for his honesty, independence, and deep respect for the people he served. He didn’t play political games; he focused on policy, public service, and doing what was right, even when it wasn’t popular. Like Simon, I believe leadership starts with integrity and ends with action. He worked across the aisle without ever losing his principles. That’s the kind of representative I aim to be: someone grounded in values, serious about results, and never afraid to speak the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable.
Yes—though I don’t believe in imitation, I do believe in inspiration. I model my leadership on figures who combined operational clarity with moral courage and a deep commitment to systemic reform.

I’m inspired by Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman elected to Congress, who ran “unbought and unbossed.” Her unapologetic advocacy for marginalized communities and her refusal to be tokenized resonate deeply with my own campaign’s values.

I also draw from Barbara Jordan, whose constitutional brilliance and integrity during the Watergate hearings showed how principled oversight can restore public trust. Her ability to translate complex systems into accessible truths is something I strive for in every compliance framework I build.

And I admire John Lewis, not just for his civil rights legacy, but for his belief in “good trouble”—the kind of strategic disruption that leads to lasting change. My campaign is rooted in that same spirit: challenging broken systems with dignity, precision, and purpose.

These leaders didn’t just hold office—they reshaped it. That’s the legacy I aim to build. If you'd like, I can help you craft a tribute post or campaign message that weaves these inspirations into your narrative.
Honestly, no - I don’t believe in modeling myself after others, though I do look up to others. To borrow a quote from Ferris Bueller quoting John Lennon: “I don’t believe in Beatles, I just believe in me.” I wasn’t made to walk in someone else’s shoes. I believe in showing up as my full self, with my own experiences, values, and voice. That’s what the people I represent deserve - authentic leadership, not imitation.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Bill Foster on IL 11th US congress district
Back in my hometown, a boy tried to bungee jump from a tree using a regular rope. He got hurt—but his family didn’t have health insurance, so they didn’t take him to the hospital. For days, they tried to tough it out. Eventually, the boy told his mom he didn’t need birthday or Christmas gifts for the next five years if they could just go. When they finally did, doctors found he had a broken back and was lucky not to be paralyzed. That was before the ACA. And now, as politicians try to roll back healthcare protections, I worry that more families will face impossible choices like that one. No child should have to beg for medical care.
Absolutely. One story that continues to shape my campaign came from a young caregiver in Rogers Park who was juggling three part-time jobs while caring for her disabled mother. She told me how she felt invisible to policymakers—too poor to be heard, too busy to organize, and too exhausted to advocate. Yet she was doing the work of a full-time nurse, social worker, and breadwinner, all without recognition or support.

Her story reminded me that policy isn’t abstract—it’s personal. It’s about the people who hold families together in silence, who navigate broken systems with grace, and who deserve more than lip service from their government. Her resilience mirrors my own journey organizing this campaign remotely from a nursing home. We’re both proof that leadership and strength come in many forms—and that representation must reflect the full spectrum of lived experience.

That story fuels my commitment to accessible governance, disability rights, and economic justice. It’s not just touching—it’s a call to action.
I met a man at my local dog park, and over the past several months we’ve built a quiet but meaningful friendship. He had a stroke a few years ago and is still in recovery. Though he’s been a U.S. citizen for decades, he lives in fear - fear of ICE agents wearing masks and grabbing people off the street. Because of his stroke, he can’t speak to defend himself, and that fear is very real for him. That stayed with me. He is a neighbor, a citizen, and a human being who deserves safety, dignity, and peace of mind. I’m running to fight for people like him - for his healthcare, his security, and his right to live without fear in the country he calls home.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

yes
The American government.
My thesaurus is so terrible… it’s terrible.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

I like humor,
Yes, compromise can be necessary, but I feel like many of our lawmakers — and in particular, Democrats — forget that compromise means that both sides have to make a sacrifice and both sides should get something out of the end result. Even more importantly, too many politicians are willing to compromise on what counts as basic human dignity. In a perfect world, we'd all agree on every solution, but that's not reality. We have to work through problems to find common ground, but that should only happen when we're working from the premise that everyone deserves rights, safety, and the ability to comfortably afford housing, groceries, and healthcare, no matter their income, race, gender, sexuality, background, or any other demographic. We simply cannot compromise on that fact.
Compromise is part of governing, but it matters what we’re compromising on and who we’re compromising with. I believe in working across differences to get real results for people. However, I don’t believe in compromising on basic rights, core values, or the needs of working families just to maintain peace in Washington. Real leadership means finding common ground when possible and standing firm when it matters most.
Yes—compromise is both necessary and desirable for effective policymaking, especially in a diverse democracy like ours. It’s not about diluting values; it’s about building coalitions that move policy forward while respecting the lived experiences of others. The best legislation often emerges from rigorous debate, principled negotiation, and a willingness to find common ground without abandoning core convictions. As a candidate, I believe compromise should never mean sacrificing transparency, equity, or accountability. But it should mean listening deeply, adapting intelligently, and designing solutions that serve the broader public—not just the loudest voices or most powerful interests. Real progress requires both clarity of purpose and flexibility in approach. That’s the kind of leadership I bring to the table.
Absolutely, compromise is both necessary and desirable in policymaking, but not on every issue. We should be willing to find common ground on matters like taxes and budgets to keep government functioning. However, when it comes to fundamental rights and people’s ability to live safely and authentically in this country, there is no room for compromise. Those are non-negotiable.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Yes
We need a budget that prioritizes Americans’ needs and wants ahead of those of special interests. Every American should be able to afford housing, groceries, and healthcare with money left over to spend and save. While almost every voter would agree with that sentiment, corporate lobbying exists to stop that idea from becoming reality. In the House, I intend to advocate for budgets that put Americans first: their health, their livelihoods, their families, and the services and institutions in our government that benefit real people rather than corporate profits.
The Constitution grants the House the power to originate revenue bills, and we should start exercising it. For too long, Congress has ceded too much power to the executive branch, especially on spending and economic policy. If elected, I’ll work to take that power back. We need to write tax policy that works for the people, closing loopholes, taxing billionaires fairly, and investing in working families. Congress should lead on how we raise and spend money not presidents or lobbyists
As a candidate for the U.S. House, I view the constitutional power to originate revenue bills as a strategic lever for equity, transparency, and accountability. This isn’t just a procedural rule—it’s a responsibility to ensure that the way we fund government reflects the values and needs of everyday people.

If elected, I would use this authority to:

Embed audit resilience into federal spending: Every revenue bill should be paired with clear compliance protocols, donor vetting standards, and public-facing dashboards that show where money comes from and how it’s used.

Advance economic justice: I’d prioritize tax structures that reduce burdens on working families, caregivers, and disabled individuals—especially those navigating systemic barriers without recognition or support.

Democratize budget priorities: Revenue bills should reflect community input, not just lobbyist influence. I’d push for participatory budgeting models and transparent allocation frameworks that empower constituents to shape federal investments.

Build legacy infrastructure: I’d design revenue legislation with long-term resilience in mind—so future lawmakers inherit systems that are clear, ethical, and adaptable.

This power isn’t just about raising money—it’s about raising standards. And I intend to use it to build a government that earns public trust, not just collects public funds.
The House holds the purse strings, and that means real power to stop funding discrimination. There are places in this country where trans people can’t even legally use the bathroom, yet those states are still getting our tax dollars to build airports, hospitals, and other infrastructure that exclude us.

If Florida wants federal money to build an airport where I, a trans woman, can’t use the bathroom, I want to be able to say, “No more money, honey.” If Alabama wants to build a hospital but refuses emergency care to trans people, I want to tell them to take their bigotry and shove it, or lose the funding.

We have the power to cut off the cash to anyone who discriminates. Like a rebellious teenager who just turned 18, the only thing that truly forces change is closing the wallet. If they want to keep their hate, they can do it without our money. I have a feeling these places will crawl back to us pretty quickly to say they'll change their ways to get their funding.

This is how we hold them accountable. This is how we protect our rights. It’s exactly how the Civil Rights Act is supposed to work, and how the Equality Act would work if we could get it passed. Until then, we should use the power of the budget to make it happen.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

yes, I'll take high priority
First and foremost, House investigative powers need to hold the Executive Branch accountable. Our checks and balances exist for a reason and while Donald Trump is pushing them to their limits, House members need to remember that the legislative branch is supposed to be one of three equal parts of our government, not a submissive B-team beholden to the whims of the president.

Second, the United States dispenses billions of dollars to foreign countries and entities and much of that money is misused or never accounted for to begin with. The House needs to ensure American money abroad is not only spent responsibly but also as a net good to the world and our country. With any foreign aid, a certain level of loss and misuse can be expected but that doesn’t excuse the House from working to mitigate those risks. Likewise, the House must ensure that all foreign military aid is being used in compliance with American laws like the Leahy Act.

Third and finally, House investigative powers have been abused for decades, used — particularly by the Republican Party — to carry water for fake scandals and culture war bullshit. Just because someone is elected to the House does not mean it’s permissible to push hateful and inaccurate narratives for political purposes. There need to be protocols to remove investigative powers from those who abuse them.
The House’s investigative powers should be used to serve the public interest, not score political points. We need real oversight of corporate abuse, government waste, and threats to our democracy—including attacks on workers’ rights, environmental rollbacks, and corruption at the highest levels. If elected, I’d support investigations that shine a light on how power is being used, or misused, and make sure no one is above the law, whether they sit in a boardroom or the Oval Office. Accountability builds trust. Without it, democracy breaks down.
The U.S. House should wield its investigative powers as a tool for truth, transparency, and accountability—not political theater. These powers are constitutionally implied and historically rooted in Congress’s duty to legislate wisely and oversee the conduct of public institutions2.

Here’s how I believe the House should use them:

🔍 Legislative Precision Investigations should inform policymaking by uncovering facts, identifying systemic failures, and spotlighting gaps in existing laws. The goal isn’t just exposure—it’s reform.

🧭 Checks and Balances The House must act as a watchdog over executive agencies, federal spending, and regulatory enforcement. Investigations help ensure that power is exercised ethically and within legal bounds.

🧑🏽‍⚖️ Public Trust and Education Hearings and inquiries should demystify government operations for the public. When done transparently, they build civic understanding and restore faith in democratic institutions.

🛠️ Systemic Reform

Investigative findings should lead to structural improvements—not just headlines. That means translating oversight into actionable legislation, compliance protocols, and legacy infrastructure.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: The House must use its investigative powers aggressively and without hesitation. We need to identify these masked ICE agents who are terrorizing our communities, hold them accountable, fire them, and strip them of their benefits. No one is above the law, and those who abuse their power must face real consequences. The House’s oversight role isn’t just a formality, it’s essential to protecting our rights and ensuring justice for all.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Do right and good jobs
I’m working on earning the most important endorsement of all: the trust of every voter in the 9th District.
While I’m proud to lead with transparency and grassroots strength, my campaign is currently building its endorsement coalition. I welcome support from organizations and individuals who share our commitment to audit resilience, civic empowerment, and inclusive governance. If you’re ready to stand with us, let’s connect.
You wouldn't know them. The people who want me to run for office are every day people who need help. Most of the people who want me to run are disabled or elderly every day people. But that's enough for me. I don't give a good goddamn who the Chamber of Commerce wants to be our next Representative, but my friend and neighbor Carlos sure as hell matters to me.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Friends, Republican
The committees I’m most interested in if elected are the Oversight, Ethics, and Foreign Affairs Committees.

We need more accountability in our political system and be able to develop new protocols to ensure that accountability. Oversight provides a useful tool to hold the executive branch and its agencies accountable. Additionally, I would use my position on the Oversight Committee to draw attention to the Trump administration’s active harms to Americans and my constituents.

In the Ethics Committee, I would work tirelessly to hold other members of Congress and myself accountable not to our bank accounts but the American people. If we want Congress to work, we have to make sure that elections and politics are about advocating for popular policies, not catering to the highest corporate bidder. Likewise, members of Congress should not be able to trade individual stocks and on the Ethics Committee, I would push for regulations and codes that would curb this corrupt behavior.

As for Foreign Affairs, our foreign policy track record shows that when the US steps into foreign wars or geopolitical power vacuums, especially in Central America and the Middle East, we usually leave the situation much worse than how we found it. Our government continues to claim we can’t afford to address the climate crisis or pay reparations or make healthcare a human right for all, as children in the US go hungry and veterans are unhoused. On the Foreign Affairs Committee, I would advocate for policy that uplifts rather than destroys and prioritizes human rights and dignity above all else. I would also raise serious concerns about friendliness with foreign nations and entities that abuse human rights.
I’d be especially interested in serving on committees where I can put my experience in public health, labor, and environmental safety to work. That includes Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure. I’m also deeply committed to oversight and reform, particularly around labor rights, climate resilience, and making government more accountable to working families. I want to be where real problems get solved and where working people have a voice at the table.
My top choice would be the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. We need real consequences for federal agents and officials who have abused their power or violated the rights of the people they are meant to serve. I believe strongly that Congress must not shy away from investigating those who have acted unlawfully or unethically - especially when those actions are masked by federal authority. Oversight isn't just a political tool; it’s a critical function of democracy and justice.

I’m also deeply interested in the Science, Space, and Technology Committee. Scientific advancement has shaped every major leap forward in our country’s history - from medicine to clean energy to space exploration. Having a hand in shaping national policy that supports research, innovation, and equitable access to technological progress would be both a gift and an honor. As someone with a background in both the arts and computer science, I see science as not just a technical field, but a driver of imagination, growth, and progress.

Another committee that inspires me is Natural Resources. Theodore Roosevelt is a personal hero, and I take seriously the legacy of conservation he began. I believe our natural landscapes are not only beautiful - they’re vital to our health, economy, and sense of national identity. Protecting public lands, ensuring clean water, and addressing the climate crisis should be central to our legislative mission.

And barring those, I’d happily join the Party Planning Committee - because let’s be honest, birthdays in Congress are serious business and a lot of these cakes have so many candles on them they can be a real fire hazard. In all seriousness, I believe humor is essential. Never take yourself too seriously, but always take the work - and the lives it affects - very seriously.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Science and Tech, education, financial, international policy, Food Industry
Since the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, money has equated to speech in American politics which has had disastrous effects on our political system. Candidates and PACs should be subject to more stringent reporting requirements and Congress must take legislative action to undo the Citizens United ruling.

Financial disclosures are, of course, important for candidates and elected officials to submit, but I also think they should be easier to find and even openly publicized by candidates and politicians. After I posted my financial disclosures, I can't count the number of people who told me they didn't even know this form existed in the first place.

But we can't just accept the bare minimum (i.e. knowing the financial interests of our elected officials and keeping dark money out of politics). We have to take action against political corruption for financial gain. Members of Congress should not be able to trade individual stocks while in office due to insider trading concerns. Ones who do should face scrutiny, not just by voters but by the House Ethics Committee. Additionally, Citizens United needs to be overturned so corporations and dark money don't have a larger voice than voters and the Supreme Court needs a binding code of ethics to ensure they don't take bribes and there should be an easier process to remove them from office in the event that they violate that code.
Transparency and accountability aren't optional—they’re the foundation of a functioning democracy. People have a right to know how public money is being spent and who their elected officials are working for.

We need stricter disclosure laws, stronger oversight of federal spending, and real consequences for corruption and self-dealing. That includes closing loopholes that allow dark money to influence our elections and making sure campaign finance data is accessible and clear.

As a candidate, I believe in practicing what I preach. That means honest communication, clear priorities, and a commitment to earning trust through actions—not just words.
The government works for us. And the money they spend is our money. This country is for "We the People" not just some elite folks at the top.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Mark_Su_20250516_105419.jpg

Mark Su (R)

Government should keep balance of financial transparency and regulations, should set well organized rules to keep health of financial situations, and government should accountable on these issues.
One story that has stayed with me came from a single mother who approached our team during a petition drive. She shared how she’d never voted before—not because she didn’t care, but because she felt invisible. She worked two jobs, raised her kids alone, and never saw a candidate who spoke directly to her reality. But when she saw our campaign talking about transparency, legacy, and building systems that serve everyday people, she said, ‘I finally feel seen.’ That moment reminded me why I do this—not just to win a seat, but to build a platform where every voice matters. Her story fuels my commitment to operational clarity and inclusive leadership.
One accomplishment I’m deeply proud of is designing and operationalizing a full-scale campaign compliance framework—from FEC filings to donor vetting dashboards—entirely under remote constraints. After pivoting from the 50th Ward aldermanic race, I didn’t just regroup—I rebuilt. I filed my Statement of Organization, launched the Rights Of Americans Association National Committee, and began mobilizing volunteers for a petition drive that meets audit-resilient standards. What makes this accomplishment meaningful isn’t just the technical precision—it’s the fact that I turned a transition into a blueprint. I created tools that future candidates can inherit, stress-test, and improve. That’s the kind of legacy I’m building: one rooted in transparency, resilience, and empowerment.
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Sam_Polan_25.jpg

Sam Polan (D)

I consider the greatest honor to be the challenge coin bestowed upon me by my Soldiers in acknowledgment of my leadership.
The United States government should play a proactive, principled, and strategic role in the development and use of artificial intelligence—one that balances innovation with public trust, national security, and civil rights.

Here’s how I believe that role should be shaped:

🏛️ Regulatory Stewardship The government must establish clear guardrails for ethical AI use, including privacy protections, anti-bias standards, and transparency requirements. This includes oversight of both public and private sector applications to prevent misuse and discrimination.

🧠 Public Sector Innovation Federal agencies should harness AI to improve service delivery, streamline operations, and enhance data-driven decision-making. From case management to citizen engagement, AI can make government more responsive and efficient—if deployed responsibly2.

🛡️ National Security and Infrastructure AI is central to cybersecurity, defense, and critical infrastructure resilience. The government must invest in secure, domestically developed AI systems and ensure that strategic technologies are not vulnerable to foreign manipulation.

🤝 Interagency Collaboration and Talent Development Agencies should coordinate through councils and shared frameworks to build AI capacity, share best practices, and recruit diverse technical talent. This includes developing public AI strategies and removing bureaucratic barriers to innovation3.

🧬 Democratizing Access and Equity

AI must serve all communities—not just the privileged few. The government should fund inclusive research, support open-source tools, and ensure that AI benefits reach underserved populations, including disabled and rural communities.
🧩 The Election Integrity and Accessibility Act

1. National Audit Resilience Standards Establish mandatory audit protocols for campaign finance, petition signatures, and ballot tabulation. Require digital dashboards for public transparency and real-time compliance tracking across all federal races.

2. Universal Ballot Access Infrastructure Fund and standardize signature collection systems, including mobile verification tools and remote volunteer coordination platforms. Ensure disabled and homebound candidates and voters have equal access to participation.

3. Voter Registration Modernization Mandate automatic voter registration through federal agencies, with opt-out provisions. Require states to maintain secure, interoperable databases that flag duplicate registrations and ensure timely updates.

4. Election Workforce Equity Grants Provide federal grants to recruit, train, and retain diverse election workers—including caregivers, disabled individuals, and formerly incarcerated citizens—through inclusive hiring pipelines and civic education programs.

5. Legacy Infrastructure Mandate Require campaigns receiving federal matching funds to submit legacy plans: documentation of compliance systems, outreach frameworks, and succession protocols that future candidates can inherit and improve.

6. Digital Petition and Verification Pilot Program Launch a federal pilot for secure digital petitioning, with biometric safeguards and audit trails. This would empower remote candidates and modernize ballot access without compromising integrity.


You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:

Campaign finance

Name Party Receipts* Disbursements** Cash on hand Date
David Abrevaya Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 As of April 16, 2025
Kat Abughazaleh Democratic Party $904,576 $237,808 $666,768 As of June 30, 2025
Bushra Amiwala Democratic Party $198,933 $7,886 $191,047 As of June 30, 2025
Phil Andrew Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Daniel K. Biss Democratic Party $702,975 $57,501 $645,474 As of June 30, 2025
Laura Fine Democratic Party $262,805 $25,579 $237,226 As of June 30, 2025
Justin Ford Democratic Party $24,509 $23,524 $986 As of June 30, 2025
Tamika La'Shon Hill Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Hoan Huynh Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Miracle Jenkins Democratic Party $29,446 $27,185 $2,261 As of June 30, 2025
Bethany Johnson Democratic Party $789 $212 $577 As of June 30, 2025
Bruce Leon Democratic Party $610,000 $0 $610,000 As of June 30, 2025
Jill Manrique Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Lauren Million Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Sam Polan Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Nick Pyati Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Howard Rosenblum Democratic Party $49,946 $768 $49,178 As of June 30, 2025
Mike Simmons Democratic Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Rocio Cleveland Republican Party $0 $0 $0 Data not available***
Mark Su Republican Party $10,400 $3,039 $7,361 As of June 30, 2025

Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee."
** According to the FEC, a disbursement "is a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or anything of value to influence a federal election," plus other kinds of payments not made to influence a federal election.
*** Candidate either did not report any receipts or disbursements to the FEC, or Ballotpedia did not find an FEC candidate ID.

General election race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods

Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:

  • Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
  • Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
  • Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[1]
  • Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.

Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[2][3][4]

Race ratings: Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2026
Race trackerRace ratings
9/2/20258/26/20258/19/20258/12/2025
The Cook Political Report with Amy WalterSolid DemocraticSolid DemocraticSolid DemocraticSolid Democratic
Decision Desk HQ and The HillPendingPendingPendingPending
Inside Elections with Nathan L. GonzalesSolid DemocraticSolid DemocraticSolid DemocraticSolid Democratic
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal BallSafe DemocraticSafe DemocraticSafe DemocraticSafe Democratic
Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week.

Ballot access

This section will contain information on ballot access related to this state's elections when it is available.

District history

The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.

2024

See also: Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2024

Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 19 Republican primary)

Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 19 Democratic primary)

General election

General election for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky defeated Seth Alan Cohen in the general election for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky (D)
 
68.4
 
231,722
Image of Seth Alan Cohen
Seth Alan Cohen (R) Candidate Connection
 
31.6
 
107,106

Total votes: 338,828
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on March 19, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky
 
100.0
 
75,106

Total votes: 75,106
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

No candidate advanced from the primary.

Candidate
%
Votes
Michael Walters (Write-in)
 
100.0
 
57

Vote totals may be incomplete for this race.

Total votes: 57
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2022

See also: Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky defeated Max Rice in the general election for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky (D)
 
71.7
 
179,615
Image of Max Rice
Max Rice (R)
 
28.3
 
70,915

Total votes: 250,530
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on June 28, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky
 
100.0
 
76,956

Total votes: 76,956
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Max Rice advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on June 28, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Max Rice
Max Rice
 
100.0
 
22,751

Total votes: 22,751
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2020

See also: Illinois' 9th Congressional District election, 2020

General election

General election for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky defeated Sargis Sangari in the general election for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky (D)
 
71.0
 
262,045
Image of Sargis Sangari
Sargis Sangari (R)
 
29.0
 
107,125

Total votes: 369,170
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Incumbent Jan Schakowsky defeated Andrew Heldut (Unofficially withdrew) in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on March 17, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jan Schakowsky
Jan Schakowsky
 
99.7
 
127,467
Image of Andrew Heldut
Andrew Heldut (Unofficially withdrew) (Write-in)
 
0.3
 
355

Total votes: 127,822
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9

Sargis Sangari defeated Richard Mayers in the Republican primary for U.S. House Illinois District 9 on March 17, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sargis Sangari
Sargis Sangari
 
100.0
 
11,808
Richard Mayers (Write-in)
 
0.0
 
1

Total votes: 11,809
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates



District analysis

This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.

See also

Illinois 2026 primaries 2026 U.S. Congress elections
Seal of Illinois.png
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
CongressLogosmall.png
Illinois congressional delegation
Voting in Illinois
Illinois elections:
202620252024202320222021202020192018
Democratic primary battlegrounds
Republican primary battlegrounds
U.S. Senate Democratic primaries
U.S. Senate Republican primaries
U.S. House Democratic primaries
U.S. House Republican primaries
U.S. Congress elections
U.S. Senate elections
U.S. House elections
Special elections
Ballot access

External links

Footnotes

  1. Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
  2. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
  3. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
  4. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
Mike Bost (R)
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
Democratic Party (16)
Republican Party (3)