In re JAMES BLODGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, et al. (1992)

| In re JAMES BLODGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1991 |
| Important Dates |
| Decided: January 13, 1992 |
| Outcome |
| Petition denied or appeal dismissed |
| Vote |
| 7-2 |
| Majority |
| Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas • Byron White |
| Dissenting |
| Harry Blackmun • John Paul Stevens |
In re JAMES BLODGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 1992.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Washington Western U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty (cf. extra legal jury influence, death penalty)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Washington
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 502 U.S. 236
- How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes