Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
In re WINN (1909)

![]() |
in re WINN |
---|
Term: 1908 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 5, 1909 |
Decided: May 3, 1909 |
Outcome |
Stay, petition, or motion granted |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
David Josiah Brewer • William Rufus Day • Melville Weston Fuller • John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • William Henry Moody • Rufus Wheeler Peckham • Edward Douglass White |
in re WINN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 3, 1909. The case was argued before the court on April 5, 1909.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition, stay, or motion. The case originated from the Iowa U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Iowa.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - comity primarily removal cases, civil procedure (cf. comity, criminal and First Amendment); deference to foreign judicial tribunals
- Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Judge
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 213 U.S. 458
- How the court took jurisdiction: Mandamus
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Henry Moody
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes