Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Indiana Public Question 1, Bailable Offenses and Substantial Risk Standard Amendment (2026)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Indiana Public Question 1

Flag of Indiana.png

Election date

November 3, 2026

Topic
Bail policy and Criminal trials
Status

On the ballot

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



Indiana Public Question 1, the Bailable Offenses and Substantial Risk Standard Amendment, is on the ballot in Indiana as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026.[1]

A "yes" vote supports amending the Indiana Constitution to deny bail for individuals charged with crimes when:

  • the proof of the charge is evident, or the presumption is strong; and
  • the accused individual poses a substantial risk to any other person or the community.

A "no" vote opposes amending the Indiana Constitution to deny bail for individuals charged with crimes when:

  • the proof of the charge is evident, or the presumption is strong; and
  • the accused individual poses a substantial risk to any other person or the community.


Overview

How would Public Question 1 change the bail process in Indiana?

See also: Text of measure

Public Question 1 would allow courts to deny bail to defendants in cases where the proof is evident, or the presumption of guilt is strong; and the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community.[2]

Currently, Article 1, Section 17 of the Indiana Constitution only specifies that individuals charged with murder or treason are not bailable when the proof is evident, or the presumption of guilt is strong.

Who supports and opposes Public Question 1?

See also: Support and Opposition

In the Indiana State Senate, Public Question 1 passed 43-2, with two members absent and two not voting. In the Indiana House of Representatives, it was approved by a vote of 75-11, with 14 members not voting. Every Republican in both chambers voted in support of Public Question 1, while Democrats showed split support. In the Senate, eight Democrats voted to support the amendment, while two voted against it. In the House, 15 Democrats voted in support of the amendment, 11 voted against it, and four did not vote.[3]

Speaking in support of Public Question 1, State Sen. Eric Koch (R-44) said, "This resolution moving forward is a great step toward ensuring our communities are protected from those who pose a threat." Additionally, State Rep. Chris Jeter (R-88) stated that, "This is a public safety amendment to the Indiana Constitution. Today... every criminal defendant is authorized to be released on bail, unless it is determined for treason, even if (they are) a substantial risk to the public. This amendment would change that to allow anyone who's deemed a public safety threat to be held indefinitely."[4]

Speaking in opposition to Public Question 1, State Sen. Greg Taylor (D-33) said, "It's not based on the charge — it's based on the person, which makes this even more egregious. If you don't think there are some judges out here that may have bias in their community of certain people, then you haven't been to court in Indiana."[5]

What other states have decided bail denial ballot measures?

See also: Bail denial on the ballot

Forty-one states have a right to bail explicitly included in the constitution.[6]

Since 2023, three states have voted on four ballot measures related to bail policy. Of these measures, all four passed. Texas voted on the most recent measure, Proposition 3, which passed with 61% of the vote.

Bail policy ballot measures since 2023
YearStateOfficial titleSummaryStatus
2025TexasProposition 3Require judges or magistrates to deny bail to individuals accused of certain violent or sexual offenses that are punishable as a felony if it is demonstrated after a hearing through a preponderance of the evidence that the accused will likely not willfuly appear in court or by clear and convincing evidence that the accused is a danger to the community or victimApproveda
2024ColoradoAmendment IRemove the right to bail in cases of first-degree murder when the proof is evident, or the presumption is greatApproveda
2023WisconsinQuestion 1Allow the state legislature to define what serious harm means in relation to the bail conditions that judges impose on accused persons released before their criminal trial, for the purpose of “[protecting] members of the community from serious harm"Approveda
2023WisconsinQuestion 2Authorize judges to consider the totality of the circumstances when imposing and setting cash bail for persons accused of violent crimesApproveda

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title is as follows:[7]

Public Question #1

Currently, under the Constitution of the State of Indiana, a person charged with murder or treason is not entitled to be released on bail if the proof is evident or the presumption strong. Shall the Constitution of the State of Indiana be amended to provide that a person charged with an offense other than murder or treason is not entitled to bail if:

(1) the proof is evident or the presumption strong; and
(2) the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community.

(This question concerns Article 1, Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana.)[8]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 1, Section 17 of the Indiana Constitution

The measure would amend Section 17 of Article 1 of the Indiana Constitution. The following underlined text would be added.[1]

Section 17. Offenses, other than murder or treason, shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless the accused poses a substantial risk to any other person or the community. Murder or treason shall not be bailable when the proof is evident, or the presumption strong. An offense other than murder or treason shall not be bailable if:
(1) the proof is evident or the presumption strong; and
(2) the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community.
[8]

Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • State Sen. Erich Koch (R): "This resolution moving forward is a great step toward ensuring our communities are protected from those who pose a threat."
  • State Rep. Chris Jeter (R): "This is a public safety amendment to the Indiana Constitution. Today... every criminal defendant is authorized to be released on bail, unless it is determined for treason, even if (they are) a substantial risk to the public. This amendment would change that to allow anyone who's deemed a public safety threat to be held indefinitely."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Arguments

  • State Sen. Greg Taylor (D): "It's not based on the charge — it's based on the person, which makes this even more egregious. If you don't think there are some judges out here that may have bias in their community of certain people, then you haven't been to court in Indiana."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Indiana ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Background

Other bail policy measures on the ballot

In November 2025, 61.1% of Texas voters approved a constitutional amendment concerning bail policy. The amendment requires judges or magistrates to deny bail to individuals accused of certain violent or sexual offenses that are punishable as a felony if it is demonstrated after a hearing through a preponderance of the evidence that the accused will likely not willfully appear in court or by clear and convincing evidence that the accused is a danger to the community or victim.

Before the amendment was approved, the only offenses for which a judge could deny bail in Texas were capital offenses or certain offenses committed while on pretrial release or probation. Under the amendment, bail can also be denied for the following offenses:

  • murder;
  • aggravated assault resulting in serious bodily injury to the victim or performed with a firearm, club, knife, or explosive;
  • aggravated kidnapping, robbery, and sexual assault;
  • indecency with a child; and
  • human trafficking.

Alabama voters will decide a constitutional amendment concerning bail policy in May 2026. The amendment would expand the state's bail law by adding to the list of crimes for which bail can be denied.[9] As of December 2025, bail can be denied in Alabama for murder, sexual torture, terrorism, aggravated child abuse, as well as kidnapping, rape, sodomy, domestic violence, human trafficking, burglary, arson, and robbery if in the first-degree. The amendment would permit bail to be denied for the following offenses as well:

  • shooting or discharging a firearm, explosive, or other weapon into an occupied dwelling, building, railroad locomotive, railroad car, aircraft, automobile, truck, or watercraft; and
  • solicitation, attempt, or conspiracy to commit murder.

Tennessee voters will decide a constitutional amendment concerning bail policy on November 3, 2026. The amendment would remove the right to bail in cases where the presumption of guilt is great, and the defendant is accused of the following offenses:[10]

  • acts of terrorism;
  • second-degree murder;
  • aggravated rape of a child;
  • grave torture; and
  • any other offense for which a convicted individual could not be released prior to the expiration of at least 85% of their sentence.

Bail denial on the ballot

See also: Bail policy ballot measures and Civil and criminal trial ballot measures

Beginning in 1995, nine states have granted judges the ability to deny a defendant bail, even if the defendant is not accused of a capital offense. In each state, voters approved a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that permitted the denial of bail.

States that have granted judges the ability to deny a defendant bail, even if the defendant is not accused of a capital offense
StateDateTitleOutcomeYes VoteNo Vote
Texas2025Proposition 3, Denial of Bail for Certain Violent or Sexual Offenses Punishable as a Felony AmendmentApproveda61.1%38.9%
Alabama2022Amendment 1, Allow Denial of Bail for Offenses Enumerated by State Legislature AmendmentApproveda80.5%19.5%
New Jersey2014Question 1, Pretrial Detention AmendmentApproveda61.8%38.2%
Washington2010HJR 4220, Judge Bail Authority AmendmentApproveda84.6%15.4%
Oregon1999Measure 71, Crime Victims' Rights and Pretrial Release AmendmentApproveda58.0%42.0%
Pennsylvania1998Joint Resolution 1, Crimes Where Bail is Disallowed AmendmentApproveda72.9%27.1%
Louisiana1998Amendment 6, Bail Denial AmendmentApproveda68.3%31.7%
Ohio1997Bail Restrictions Constitutional AmendmentApproveda72.9%27.1%
South Carolina1996Referendum 1Approveda87.1%12.9%

Path to the ballot

Amending the Indiana Constitution

See also: Amending the Indiana Constitution

A simple majority vote is required during two successive legislative sessions for the Indiana State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 51 votes in the Indiana House of Representatives and 26 votes in the Indiana State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.

Senate Joint Resolution 1 (2023-2024)

The following is the timeline of the constitutional amendment in the state legislature:[3]

  • January 9, 2023: The constitutional amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 1 (SJR 1).
  • April 6, 2023: The Indiana House of Representatives voted 70-19 to pass an amended version of the constitutional amendment.
  • April 13, 2023: The Indiana State Senate voted 38-9 to pass the amended version of the constitutional amendment.


Indiana State Senate
Voted on April 13, 2023
Votes Required to Pass: 26
YesNoNV
Total3893
Total %76.0%18.0%6.0%
Democratic (D)091
Republican (R)3802
Indiana House of Representatives
Voted on April 6, 2023
Votes Required to Pass: 51
YesNoNV
Total701911
Total %70.0%19.0%11.0%
Democratic (D)11163
Republican (R)5938

Senate Joint Resolution 1 (2025-2026)

The following is the timeline of the constitutional amendment in the state legislature:[11]

  • December 9, 2025: The constitutional amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 1 (SJR 1).
  • January 22, 2026: The Indiana State Senate voted 43-2, with two members absent and two members not voting, to pass the constitutional amendment.
  • February 17, 2026: The Indiana House of Representatives voted 75-11, with 14 members not voting, to pass the constitutional amendment.


Partisan Direction Index = 36.1% (Lean Republican)
Democratic Support
63.9%
Republican Support
100.0%
How does this vote compare to other legislative ballot measures in 2026?
Learn more about the ballot measures PDI →
Indiana State Senate
Voted on January 22, 2026
Votes Required to Pass: 26
YesNoNV
Total4324
Total %87.7%4.1%8.2%
Democratic (D)820
Republican (R)3504
Indiana House of Representatives
Voted on February 17, 2026
Votes Required to Pass: 51
YesNoNV
Total751114
Total %75%11%14%
Democratic (D)15114
Republican (R)60010

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Indiana

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Indiana.

How to vote in Indiana


See also

2026 ballot measures

View other measures certified for the 2026 ballot across the U.S. and in Indiana.

Indiana ballot measures

Explore Indiana's ballot measure history, including constitutional amendments.

Legislative process

Understand how measures are placed on the ballot and the rules that apply.

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Indiana General Assembly, "Senate Joint Resolution 1 (2023)," accessed April 12, 2023
  2. Indiana State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 1," accessed March 12, 2026
  3. 3.0 3.1 Indiana General Assembly, "Senate Joint Resolution 1," accessed January 26, 2026
  4. Indiana Capital Chronicle, "Indiana bail amendment clears General Assembly, sending detention question to November ballot," accessed March 12, 2026
  5. Indiana Capital Chronicle, "Indiana bail amendment advances toward November ballot," accessed March 12, 2026
  6. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Pretrial Release: State Constitutional Right to Bail," accessed Jun 4, 2025
  7. Indiana General Assembly, "Senate Bill 3 Text," accessed March 6, 2026
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  9. Alabama State Legislature, "SB 118," accessed May 8, 2025
  10. Tennessee General Assembly, "SJR 25 Text," accessed May 8, 2025.
  11. Indiana General Assembly, "Senate Joint Resolution 1," accessed January 26, 2026
  12. Indiana Secretary of State, "2026 Indiana Election Calendar", accessed March 11, 2026
  13. Indiana Disibility Rights, "Voting FAQs," accessed March 11, 2026
  14. 14.0 14.1 Indiana Election Division, "Indiana Voter Registration Application," accessed March 11, 2026
  15. Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed March 11, 2026
  16. 16.0 16.1 Secretary of State, "2026 Indiana Voter Registration Guidebook," accessed March 11, 2026
  17. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Automatic Voter Registration," July 21, 2025
  18. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Same-Day Voter Registration," accessed March 11, 2026
  19. Indiana General Assembly, "Ind. Code § 3-7-13-1," accessed March 11, 2026
  20. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  21. Indiana Secretary of State, "Photo ID Law," accessed March 11, 2026
  22. 22.0 22.1 Indiana General Assembly, "2025 Session, Senate Bill 10," accessed March 11, 2026
  23. Indiana Secretary of State, "Obtaining a Photo ID," accessed March 11, 2026