Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

JACOB MUMMA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE POTOMAC COMPANY (1834)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JACOB MUMMA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE POTOMAC COMPANY
Term: 1834
Important Dates
Argued: March 8, 1834
Decided: March 12, 1834
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-0
Majority
Henry BaldwinGabriel DuvallJohn MarshallJohn McLeanJoseph StorySmith Thompson

JACOB MUMMA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE POTOMAC COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 12, 1834. The case was argued before the court on March 8, 1834.

In a 6-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Marshall Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - State or local government regulation, especially of business (cf. federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction, federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation)
  • Petitioner: Creditor, including institution appearing as such; e.g., a finance company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Debtor
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 33 U.S. 281
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Marshall
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph Story

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes