JAMES B. BEAM DISTILLING CO. v. GEORGIA et al. (1991)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| JAMES B. BEAM DISTILLING CO. v. GEORGIA et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1990 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: October 30, 1990 |
| Decided: June 20, 1991 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Judgment of the court |
| David Souter |
| Majority |
| John Paul Stevens |
| Concurring |
| Harry Blackmun • Thurgood Marshall • Antonin Scalia • Byron White |
| Dissenting |
| Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist |
JAMES B. BEAM DISTILLING CO. v. GEORGIA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 20, 1991. The case was argued before the court on October 30, 1990.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Georgia State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: state tax (cf. state tax)
- Petitioner: State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of
- Petitioner state: Georgia
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Georgia
- Citation: 501 U.S. 529
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
