Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
JAMES LARUE v. DEWOLFF, BOBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL (2008)

![]() |
JAMES LARUE v. DEWOLFF, BOBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL |
---|
Term: 2007 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 26, 2007 |
Decided: February 20, 2008 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
JAMES LARUE v. DEWOLFF, BOBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 20, 2008. The case was argued before the court on November 26, 2007.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the South Carolina U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - State or local government regulation, especially of business (cf. federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction, federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation)
- Petitioner: Retired or former employee
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 552 U.S. 248
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes