Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
JAMES WALKER, WARDEN, et al., PETITIONERS v. CHARLES W. MARTIN (2011)

![]() |
JAMES WALKER, WARDEN, et al., PETITIONERS v. CHARLES W. MARTIN |
---|
Term: 2010 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 29, 2010 |
Decided: February 23, 2011 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas |
JAMES WALKER, WARDEN, et al., PETITIONERS v. CHARLES W. MARTIN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 23, 2011. The case was argued before the court on November 29, 2010.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - indigents: inadequate representation by counsel (cf. right to counsel)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 562 U.S. 307
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes