Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

JAYNE BRAY, et al. v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC et al. (1993)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JAYNE BRAY, et al. v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC et al.
Term: 1992
Important Dates
Argued: October 16, 1991
Decided: January 13, 1993
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
William RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence ThomasByron White
Concurring
Anthony KennedyDavid Souter
Dissenting
Harry BlackmunSandra Day O'ConnorJohn Paul Stevens

JAYNE BRAY, et al. v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 13, 1993. The case was argued before the court on October 16, 1991.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Virginia Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - liability, civil rights acts (cf. liability, governmental and liability, nongovernmental; cruel and unusual punishment, non-death penalty)
  • Petitioner: Protester, demonstrator, picketer or pamphleteer (non-employment related), or non-indigent loiterer
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Health organization or person, nursing home, medical clinic or laboratory, chiropractor
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 506 U.S. 263
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes