JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU (2003)

![]() |
JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU |
---|
Term: 2002 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 21, 2003 |
Decided: March 25, 2003 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Sandra Day O'Connor |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter |
JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 25, 2003. The case was argued before the court on January 21, 2003.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 538 U.S. 202
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes