Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU (2003)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU
Term: 2002
Important Dates
Argued: January 21, 2003
Decided: March 25, 2003
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Anthony KennedyWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul StevensClarence Thomas
Concurring
Sandra Day O'Connor
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgDavid Souter

JEANNE WOODFORD, WARDEN v. ROBERT FREDERICK GARCEAU is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 25, 2003. The case was argued before the court on January 21, 2003.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 538 U.S. 202
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes