Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

JOHN A. RAPANOS, ET UX., et al. v. UNITED STATES (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN A. RAPANOS, ET UX., et al. v. UNITED STATES
Term: 2005
Important Dates
Argued: February 21, 2006
Decided: June 19, 2006
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
5-4
Judgment of the court
Antonin Scalia
Majority
Samuel AlitoClarence Thomas
Concurring
Anthony KennedyJohn Roberts
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

JOHN A. RAPANOS, ET UX., et al. v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 19, 2006. The case was argued before the court on February 21, 2006.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: United States
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 547 U.S. 715
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes