JOHN CUNNINGHAM v. CALIFORNIA (2007)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN CUNNINGHAM v. CALIFORNIA
Term: 2006
Important Dates
Argued: October 11, 2006
Decided: January 22, 2007
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas
Dissenting
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy

JOHN CUNNINGHAM v. CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 22, 2007. The case was argued before the court on October 11, 2006.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: sentencing guidelines
  • Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 549 U.S. 270
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=JOHN_CUNNINGHAM_v._CALIFORNIA_(2007)&oldid=9495863"