JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al. (2004)

![]() |
JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al. |
---|
Term: 2003 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 2, 2004 |
Decided: June 29, 2004 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia |
JOHN D. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 29, 2004. The case was argued before the court on March 2, 2004.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - Obscenity, federal
- Petitioner: attorney general of the United States, or his office
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Public interest organization
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 542 U.S. 656
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes