Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

JOHN FRANCIS FRY v. CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN (2007)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN FRANCIS FRY v. CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN
Term: 2006
Important Dates
Argued: March 20, 2007
Decided: June 11, 2007
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-4
Majority
Samuel Alito • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas
Dissenting
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens

JOHN FRANCIS FRY v. CHERYL K. PLILER, WARDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 11, 2007. The case was argued before the court on March 20, 2007.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 551 U.S. 112
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=JOHN_FRANCIS_FRY_v._CHERYL_K._PLILER,_WARDEN_(2007)&oldid=9495902"