Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

JOHN H. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STEPHEN M. INGERSOLL (1852)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN H. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STEPHEN M. INGERSOLL
Term: 1851
Important Dates
Argued: April 23, 1852
Decided: May 27, 1852
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
John CatronPeter Vivian DanielJohn McKinleyJohn McLeanRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne
Concurring
Benjamin Robbins Curtis
Dissenting
Robert Cooper GrierSamuel Nelson

JOHN H. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STEPHEN M. INGERSOLL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 27, 1852. The case was argued before the court on April 23, 1852.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alabama State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Interstate Relations - Boundary dispute between states
  • Petitioner: Defendant
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 54 U.S. 381
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: James Moore Wayne

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.

See also

External links

Footnotes