Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

JOHN R. IRVINE, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM R. MARSHALL AND THOMAS BARTON (1858)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN R. IRVINE, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM R. MARSHALL AND THOMAS BARTON
Term: 1857
Important Dates
Argued: April 15, 1858
Decided: May 14, 1858
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Nathan CliffordPeter Vivian DanielJohn McLeanRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne
Dissenting
John Archibald CampbellJohn CatronRobert Cooper GrierSamuel Nelson

JOHN R. IRVINE, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM R. MARSHALL AND THOMAS BARTON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 14, 1858. The case was argued before the court on April 15, 1858.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Minnesota Territorial Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 61 U.S. 558
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Peter Vivian Daniel

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes