Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

JOHN S. LYTLE v. HOUSEHOLD MANUFACTURING, INC., DBA SCHWITZER TURBOCHARGERS (1990)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOHN S. LYTLE v. HOUSEHOLD MANUFACTURING, INC., DBA SCHWITZER TURBOCHARGERS
Term: 1989
Important Dates
Argued: January 8, 1990
Decided: March 20, 1990
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanAnthony KennedyThurgood MarshallWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
Sandra Day O'ConnorAntonin Scalia

JOHN S. LYTLE v. HOUSEHOLD MANUFACTURING, INC., DBA SCHWITZER TURBOCHARGERS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 20, 1990. The case was argued before the court on January 8, 1990.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the North Carolina Western U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Jury trial (right to, as distinct from extra-legal jury influences)
  • Petitioner: Racial or ethnic minority employee or job applicant
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 494 U.S. 545
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Thurgood Marshall

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes