Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

JOSE PADILLA v. KENTUCKY (2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOSE PADILLA v. KENTUCKY
Term: 2009
Important Dates
Argued: October 13, 2009
Decided: March 31, 2010
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySonia SotomayorJohn Paul Stevens
Concurring
Samuel AlitoJohn Roberts
Dissenting
Antonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

JOSE PADILLA v. KENTUCKY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 31, 2010. The case was argued before the court on October 13, 2009.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Kentucky State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Right to counsel (cf. indigents appointment of counsel or inadequate representation)
  • Petitioner: Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Kentucky
  • Citation: 559 U.S. 356
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes