Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

JOSIAS PENNINGTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LYMAN GIBSON (1854)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
JOSIAS PENNINGTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LYMAN GIBSON
Term: 1853
Important Dates
Argued: February 20, 1854
Decided: March 1, 1854
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
John Archibald CampbellJohn CatronBenjamin Robbins CurtisPeter Vivian DanielRobert Cooper GrierJohn McLeanSamuel NelsonRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne

JOSIAS PENNINGTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LYMAN GIBSON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 1, 1854. The case was argued before the court on February 20, 1854.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: review of non-final order
  • Petitioner: Debtor
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Creditor, including institution appearing as such; e.g., a finance company
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 57 U.S. 65
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Peter Vivian Daniel

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes