Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

James P. Arguelles

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
James P. Arguelles

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Superior Court of Sacramento County
Tenure

2010 - Present

Term ends

2031

Years in position

15

Elections and appointments
Last elected

March 5, 2024

Appointed

2010

Education

Bachelor's

United States Naval Academy

Graduate

United States Army War College

Law

Harvard Law School

Military

Service / branch

U.S. Army Reserve

James P. Arguelles is a judge of the Superior Court of Sacramento County in California. He assumed office in 2010. His current term ends on January 6, 2031.

Arguelles won re-election for judge of the Superior Court of Sacramento County in California outright in the primary on March 5, 2024, after the primary and general election were canceled.

Arguelles was appointed to the superior court in October 2010 by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) to succeed Thomas M. Cecil.[1]

On June 18, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) nominated Arguelles to a seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Arguelles' nomination was returned to the president at the sine die adjournment of the U.S. Senate on January 3, 2021. Click here for more information on Arguelles' federal judicial nomination.

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California is one of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal courts. To learn more about the court, click here.

Biography

James P. Arguelles received his B.S. as a distinguished graduate from the U.S. Naval Academy, his M.S.S. as a distinguished graduate from the U.S. Army War College, and his J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. Arguelles has served as a military judge in the United States Army Reserve. Before becoming a judge on the Superior Court of Sacramento County in 2010, Arguelles was a partner at Stevens, O’Connell & Jacobs, LLP, an assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of California, and in private practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP. After law school, Arguelles was a law clerk to Judge Marilyn Huff of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.[2]

Elections

2024

See also: Municipal elections in Sacramento County, California (2024)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. James P. Arguelles (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Arguelles in this election.

2018

See also: Municipal elections in Sacramento County, California (2018)

Nonpartisan primary election

The primary election was canceled. James P. Arguelles (Nonpartisan) won the election without appearing on the ballot.

2012

See also: California judicial elections, 2012

Arguelles ran for re-election to the superior court in 2012. As an unopposed incumbent, his name did not appear on the ballot. After the primary election, Arguelles was automatically re-elected.[3]

Selection method
See also: Nonpartisan election

The 1,535 judges of the California Superior Courts compete in nonpartisan races in even-numbered years. If a candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote in the June primary election, he or she is declared the winner; if no candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff between the top two candidates is held during the November general election.[4][5][6][7]

If an incumbent judge is running unopposed in an election, his or her name does not appear on the ballot. The judge is automatically re-elected following the general election.[4]

The chief judge of any given superior court is selected by peer vote of the court's members. He or she serves in that capacity for one or two years, depending on the county.[4]

Qualifications
Candidates are required to have 10 years of experience as a law practitioner or as a judge of a court of record.[4]

Judicial nominations and appointments

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

See also: Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump

On June 18, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) nominated Arguelles to a seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.[2] To read more about the federal nominations process, click here.

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: James Arguelles
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Progress
Returned 199 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: June 18, 2020
ApprovedAABA Rating: Well qualified
Questionnaire:
DefeatedAHearing:
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
DefeatedAReported:  
DefeatedAConfirmed:
DefeatedAReturned: January 3, 2021

Nomination

On June 8, 2020, President Donald Trump (R) announced his intent to nominate Arguelles to a seat on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.[2] The president officially submitted the nomination on June 18.[8] Arguelles' nomination was returned to the president at the sine die adjournment of the U.S. Senate on January 3, 2021.[9]

Arguelles was nominated to replace Judge Lawrence O'Neill, who assumed senior status on February 2, 2020.

The American Bar Association rated Arguelles well qualified for the position.[10] To read more about ABA ratings, click here.

About the court

Eastern District of California
Ninth Circuit
USDC-Eastern District of California seal.png
Judgeships
Posts: 6
Judges: 6
Vacancies: 0
Judges
Chief: Troy L. Nunley
Active judges: Daniel Calabretta, Dena Coggins, Dale A. Drozd, Troy L. Nunley, Kirk Sherriff, Jennifer L. Thurston

Senior judges:
Garland Burrell, Morrison England, Anthony Ishii, John Mendez, Kimberly Mueller, Lawrence O'Neill, William Shubb


The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California is one of 94 United States district courts. The district operates at courthouses in Sacramento, Fresno, Redding, Bakersfield, and Yosemite When decisions of the court are appealed, they are appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in downtown San Francisco, California, at the James R. Browning Federal Courthouse.

The Eastern District of California has original jurisdiction over cases filed within its jurisdiction. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law.

The geographic jurisdiction of the Eastern District of California consists of all the following counties in the eastern part of the state of California.

There are five court divisions, with the two main court divisions covering the following counties:

The Fresno Division, covering Calaveras, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Stanislaus, Tulare and Tuolumne counties

The Sacramento Division, covering Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, El Dorado, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Yolo and Yuba counties

The Eastern Division hears cases from Riverside and San Bernardino counties at its Riverside courthouse.

The Bakersfield office has jurisdiction over certain cases in Inyo and Kern counties and on federal lands and National Parks. These cases are heard in courthouses in Bakersfield, at Edwards Air Force Base, and in Independence, California.

The Redding/Susanville office hears misdemeanors and petty crimes for federal lands and National Parks in four locations: Alturas, Chester, Herlong and Redding.

The South Lake Tahoe office hears misdemeanors and petty crimes for federal lands and National Parks.

The Yosemite office hears misdemeanors and petty crimes for Yosemite National Park.

To read opinions published by this court, click here.

The federal nomination process

Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:

  • The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
  • The nominee fills out a questionnaire and is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee, questioning them about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, etc.
  • As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial nomination was received, allowing them to express their approval or disapproval of the nominee.
  • After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the nominee.
  • If approved, the nominee is voted on by the full Senate.
  • If the Committee votes to return the nominee to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
  • The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
  • If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a federal judge.
  • If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that nominee does not become a judge.


See also


External links

Footnotes