This Giving Tuesday, help ensure voters have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions. Donate now!

Janelle Burke (Everett Public Schools school board District 2, Washington, candidate 2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

Special state legislative • Appellate courts • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • All local elections by county • How to run for office
Flag of Washington.png


Janelle Burke

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Candidate, Everett Public Schools school board District 2

Elections and appointments
Last election

November 4, 2025

Personal
Birthplace
St. Louis, Mo.
Religion
Spiritual
Profession
Graphic designer
Contact

Janelle Burke ran for election to the Everett Public Schools School Board to represent District 2 in Washington. She was on the ballot in the general election on November 4, 2025.[source]

Burke completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. Click here to read the survey answers.

[1]

Biography

Janelle Burke provided the following biographical information via Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey on October 5, 2025:

  • Birth place: St. Louis, Missouri
  • High school: Parkway South High School, Manchester, MO
  • Gender: Female
  • Religion: Spiritual
  • Profession: Graphic Designer
  • Incumbent officeholder: No
  • Campaign slogan: “The ballot is my microphone. The truth about our schools is my campaign.”
  • Campaign Facebook

Elections

General election

General election for Everett Public Schools school board District 2

Janelle Burke and Jennifer Hirman ran in the general election for Everett Public Schools school board District 2 on November 4, 2025.

Candidate
Janelle Burke (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
Jennifer Hirman (Nonpartisan)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Burke in this election.

Campaign themes

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Janelle Burke completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2025. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Burke's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I’m a mother, taxpayer, and lifelong advocate for families and children. I’ve raised kids in this system and seen firsthand how educational policies often fail the very students they claim to serve—especially Black, Brown, and disabled youth. I’m running for school board to restore parental rights, protect every child’s future, and hold schools accountable to the families they serve. I believe in education that teaches the whole child—through core academics, trades, and the arts—not one that controls, criminalizes, or experiments on them. I’m here to fight for real change—because our children deserve more than survival. They deserve to thrive.
  • Parents are the primary stakeholders in their children’s education—not school boards, not bureaucrats. I will fight to restore transparency, opt-in policies, and active parent partnerships. Parents must not be sidelined by one-sided contracts, unapproved data collection, or school decisions made without consent. Trust is built when schools serve families, not control them. Education should support the family structure, not override it. When parents are empowered, students succeed.
  • The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was meant to ensure Black children and students with disabilities had full access to quality education. But since then, research-based experimentation and policy overreach have disproportionately harmed Black, Brown, and disabled youth. My campaign is about restoring the original intent: equal opportunity, not systemic harm. I will fight to stop practices that track, punish, or control ALL students and push for culturally affirming, student-centered education that uplifts all youth.
  • Families never consented to surrender their constitutional rights to school districts. Government power in education has expanded to override basic parental authority. From hidden policies to coerced behavioral plans and ideologically driven curriculum, schools are overreaching. I stand firmly against this. The Constitution does not pause at the schoolhouse door. I will protect every family's right to direct their child’s upbringing, beliefs, and learning—without intimidation or interference.
I am deeply passionate about educational justice and I advocate fiercely for parental rights and family sovereignty in education, because no institution should override the will or wisdom of families.

I am committed to protecting our youth from the school-to-prison pipeline, which criminalizes them instead of cultivating their potential. I believe we must return to core academics and trade education—reading, writing, math, and the arts—rather than continuing with ideologically driven, experimental programs that yield little value and often cause harm.

I believe every child deserves an education that prepares them for life as a free, self-directed, and productive citizen—not as a subject of institutional control.
I look up to my grandmother. She embodies grit, tenacity, and unconditional love. She was a caretaker, a pillar in our family and community, and someone who never wavered in her commitment to doing right by others. To this day, she continues to influence the way I lead, mother, and serve. I proudly call myself her “mini me,” because everything I strive to be as a leader and a woman is rooted in the example she set.
I believe that any elected official shall uphold the Constitution without compromise, serve the people not systems and protect the rights of families without fear or favor.

Elected office is not a platform for personal power, party loyalty, or performative leadership. It is a duty—a sacred trust between the people and those they entrust with decisions that impact their children, their communities, and their futures.

I believe any elected official shall have the grit to stand against injustice, even when it’s unpopular, and the tenacity to hold institutions accountable, especially when they fail our children. They must be unafraid to name harm, disrupt harmful systems, and act as a voice for the voiceless—not a gatekeeper for the powerful.
An elected official shall recognize that families—not government—are the first and most important authority in a child's life. They shall not permit the circumvention of parental rights under the guise of policy, programming, or safety. They shall not endorse government overreach disguised as support. Instead, they shall stand in defense of family sovereignty, constitutional protections, and the sacred bond between parent and child.

I believe that officials must speak boldly when systems criminalize children, especially Black, Brown, and disabled students, and they must act boldly to dismantle school-to-prison pipelines and practices rooted in control, not care. They must champion whole-child education—academics, the arts, trades, and emotional wellness—not pathways to dependency, silence, or institutionalization.

Above all, an elected official shall lead with integrity, clarity, and courage—not just when it’s easy, but when it costs them something. Because our children’s lives, dignity, and futures are not political currency—they are the reason we lead.
I believe the core responsibilities of a school board member are to serve as a protector of public trust, a voice for families and students, and a constitutional steward over education policy. The school board is not a rubber stamp for the district—it is a vital check and balance that must ensure that every policy, budget decision, and curriculum choice reflects the values and needs of the community.

At the heart of this role is accountability—not just fiscal, but moral. School board members must ensure that students are being educated, not managed or criminalized. They must ask hard questions, examine the impact of “research-based” programs on vulnerable populations, and push back against systems that overreach into family sovereignty. I view it as my responsibility to represent families who often feel unheard, especially those raising Black, Brown, and disabled children who are frequently on the frontlines of educational harm.

A board member must also be a champion of transparency—ensuring that parental rights are not quietly overridden, that curriculum is accessible for review, and that disciplinary and special education processes are equitable and not used to marginalize students. The responsibility is to protect the whole child and ensure the district serves as an educational partner, not an institutional authority overriding the family.
Honestly, I haven’t fully defined that yet. I’m still living, still growing, and still figuring out what legacy means for me. But if I had to name one thing, it would be this: I want to be remembered as someone who didn’t flinch when it came to protecting children, standing up for families, and pushing back against systems that do harm. If my work helps others rise—especially those who feel unseen or unheard—then that’s a legacy worth leaving.
The most defining moment for me wasn’t a national event, it was deeply personal as it was the day I gave birth to my first child at the age of 16. That moment changed my life and forced me to grow up fast. Becoming a mother at such a young age shaped how I view responsibility, resilience, and the importance of community support. It made me the advocate I am today.
My very first job was at McDonald’s when I was 16. I only stayed for a couple of months. It definitely wasn’t for me, especially as a new mom trying to navigate motherhood while balancing work. That experience taught me early on the challenges many young parents face when trying to build a life while raising a child. It also taught me that every job has value, even if it isn’t your forever path.
I wouldn’t say I have one favorite book—but if I had to choose, it would be a tie between the Bible and Dialogues with the Devil by Taylor Caldwell. As a kid, I loved to read, even when it was assigned as punishment. My great-grandmother had me writing book reports from the Coptic Bible, and those stories captivated me—the mystery, the power, the truth.
Dialogues with the Devil was on her bookshelf, and after finishing The Lord of the Rings series, it was one of the last books left. It drew me in with its emotion, antagonism, and raw honesty. It made sense to me in a way few books ever have—it reflected the complexity of the world I was trying to understand.
Without hesitation...Pippi Longstocking or as she’s properly known, Pippilotta Delicatessa Windowshade Mackrelmint Ephraim’s Daughter Longstocking.

She’s been my favorite fictional character for as long as I can remember. Her quirkiness, her strength, her stamina, and most of all, her refusal to conform—she lived her truth loudly. She didn’t wait for permission to be who she was. She showed that people might be uncomfortable with you at first, but once they get past that discomfort, they see your heart. I relate to her deeply. I’m quirky, unyielding, and bold. Like Pippi, I want people to learn to accept others as they are, not as they expect them to be.
One of my biggest lifelong struggles has been balancing “Momma Bear” with what society calls “professionalism.” And truthfully, I’ve come to realize that balance may never fully exist for someone like me—because when it comes to my children and the children in my community, I refuse to be quiet, calm, or agreeable for anyone’s comfort.

Fannie Lou Hamer said, “If my child has to get this education, then you’re going to have to deal with me.” Malcolm X warned us that “only a fool would let his enemy educate his children.” I stand firmly in that truth. I do not believe in respectability politics when harm is happening in plain sight.

To me, “professionalism” and “calm expectations” are often just sanitized ways to gaslight people into silence. As Zora Neale Hurston said, “If you are silent about your pain, they’ll kill you and say you enjoyed it.” So no—I won’t be quiet, and I won’t make myself small. I speak, I advocate, and I fight boldly because I know who I’m protecting. And I make no apologies for it.
The primary job of a school board member is to protect and empower students and families, not manage schools from a distance. While oversight of budgets, policies, and leadership is essential, the real job is to be a guardian of student rights and family voice.

In my view, that means ensuring schools stay focused on their core purpose: educating—not policing, pathologizing, or programming students for control. It means removing harmful barriers—like exclusionary discipline, data-driven experimentation, and overreach into private family decisions—and replacing them with policies that build trust, safety, and academic success.

A board member should stand between the people and any institution that attempts to harm or silence them. That includes pushing back against overreaching state and federal mandates when necessary. The job is not about titles or status. The job i’s about service with courage, integrity, and clarity.

I am committed to doing just that.
My constituents are the citizens, families, and students of this district—especially those who feel unseen, unheard, or left behind. I represent parents who want to raise and educate their children without interference, students who want to learn in safe and affirming environments, and taxpayers who want accountability from their public institutions.
While I center Black, Brown, and disabled students in my work due to the disproportionate harm they've faced, I serve all youth and all families because every child’s future matters. Whether you are a parent, teacher, student, grandparent, or community member—your voice is important to me. I am here to protect the right of every family to be informed, involved, and respected in our public schools.
I would begin by doing what too many elected officials fail to do: listen. Real support starts with deep listening—hearing the needs, frustrations, and hopes of students, families, teachers, and staff across the district. Every decision I make must be informed by the lived experiences of the people I serve, not by politics, assumptions, or data alone.

I believe in building solutions from the middle ground—where different voices intersect and where policy can uplift all groups, not just the loudest or most privileged. Supporting diversity isn’t about performative language or checkbox initiatives—it’s about impact. I will push to remove barriers that disproportionately affect Black, Brown, disabled, and low-income students, while ensuring that no one is left behind.

I also support ongoing professional development and mental health resources for staff, equitable curriculum reform, inclusive arts and trades access, and real community accountability. Supporting diversity is not a trend—it’s a commitment to shaping policies that meet people where they are, while guiding the district toward justice, equity, and excellence.
will build relationships the way I’ve always done it—through community conversations, transparency, and direct connection. That means keeping an open line of communication and being an ear that listens with all my senses—not just hearing, but understanding. I don’t believe in speaking at the community—I believe in speaking with them.

I plan to hold regular public forums, attend local events, stay active in school buildings, and be a visible, accessible presence. I’m not here to chase endorsements or focus on organizational politics. My primary responsibility is to taxpayers, families, and students—the people whose daily lives are directly impacted by school board decisions.

I’ll work with anyone truly committed to improving education and outcomes—whether that’s teachers’ groups, student advocacy organizations, cultural community groups, or trade and vocational leaders. But my focus remains rooted in the people, not the politics. I’m here to amplify voices, not gatekeep them—and to encourage intra-community growth, healing, and collective action that begins with trust.
Good teaching isn’t defined by academic jargon or experimental methods—it’s measured by impact on students. A good teacher connects, inspires, and educates the whole child. That means students feel respected, supported, and prepared—not managed or misdiagnosed.

Advanced teaching strategies are often unnecessary for basic K–12 education. Foundational subjects—reading, writing, math, and the arts—require consistent, culturally aware, effective instruction, not constant reinvention. We don’t need to reinvent teaching—we need to protect it from politicized distractions.

I believe the best way to measure good teaching is by asking the students themselves. Student feedback, especially anonymous surveys, should be central to evaluating effectiveness. They are the ones experiencing these educators day in and day out. We need to trust their voices, not just administrators, data points, or test scores. If students don’t feel safe, heard, or supported in a classroom, no strategy can fix that.
The truth is, “properly funded” will remain an elusive goal until we address how basic education is defined in Washington State. According to RCW 28A.150.210, basic education is a moving target—constantly redefined, making accountability and sufficiency difficult to measure and maintain.

As a school board member, I would advocate for a community-driven reevaluation of what basic education actually includes. That must happen through a collaborative approach with families, educators, local leaders, and policymakers—not just from the top down. Proper funding is not just about asking for more money; it’s about asking what we’re funding, why, and for whom.

Until that happens, it takes a village, not just a board or a district, to create sustainable solutions. We must rally together to challenge the definitions, reprioritize what matters, and ensure tax dollars are being used to truly support students, not systems.
My principles for school safety are rooted in protecting children from ideological harm, institutional overreach, and psychological manipulation. Safety isn't just about physical environments—it’s about ensuring that students are not being mentally, emotionally, or spiritually compromised in spaces that are supposed to support them.

I strongly oppose policies that push indoctrination or introduce ideologies that conflict with the values of families and communities. School safety must include freedom from coercion—especially in areas involving identity, behavior modification, or data collection without parental consent. According to Washington RCW 28A.150.211, the state acknowledges a responsibility to provide a safe learning environment. However, safety also means respecting boundaries, honoring parental authority, and maintaining educational neutrality.

My policies will ensure that school environments prioritize academic focus, emotional protection, and moral clarity, without becoming places where children are exposed to agendas that do not mirror their family's expectations or beliefs.
While I acknowledge the importance of emotional wellness, I believe the mental health of faculty and staff is not the responsibility of the school board, but rather the responsibility of the employer and the individuals themselves. My focus is on students first.

Supporting student mental health should begin in partnership with parents, not institutional gatekeepers. Parents must lead in identifying their child’s needs, and schools should support—not replace—the role of the family. Whether it’s through IEP meetings or general support conversations, schools should collaborate with families to identify appropriate steps that reflect cultural, emotional, and developmental needs.

Mental health should never be an excuse to over-pathologize children, label them permanently, or push them into systems that monitor rather than support. My approach promotes family-first intervention and educational boundaries, not government-first solutions.
I would target any district policy that expands far beyond the light version of in loco parentis and instead undermines or replaces the voice of families. Any policy—explicit or hidden—that prioritizes one group of youth at the expense of another must be examined and reformed. That includes policies that unfairly elevate certain racial, ethnic, gender, or religious identities while silencing or neglecting others.

Our schools should reflect equality under the Constitution, not identity hierarchies. Policies must be grounded in educational excellence and moral neutrality, not social engineering. I would push to repeal or revise any policy that imposes ideological mandates, manipulates data to justify discrimination, or creates unsafe environments by forcing staff or students to conform to narratives that don’t reflect their lived realities.

My focus will always be on fairness, clarity, and the protection of every student’s right to learn free from manipulation, intimidation, or forced conformity.
I have not sought—nor will I seek—endorsements from institutions, political figures, or special interest groups. My campaign is powered by the voices of everyday people, not by organizations seeking influence or control.

I am proudly supported by families, taxpayers, parents, students, and community members who are tired of systems that harm children and silence parents. My loyalty is to the people...not to parties, gatekeepers, or institutions that have historically failed to protect our most vulnerable.

This campaign is about disrupting the status quo. The only endorsement I need is the trust of a community ready for bold, unapologetic, and child-centered change.
My ideal learning environment is one where the whole child is recognized, respected, and empowered. That means more than academic achievement—it means nurturing emotional health, building critical thinking, and supporting creativity, curiosity, and identity.

Students should learn in environments that are structured but not stifling, safe but not over-policed, challenging but also uplifting. Classrooms must return to foundational learning: reading, writing, arithmetic, the arts, and hands-on vocational exploration. But beyond curriculum, we must remove policies that label, track, or harm students—especially those who are Black, Brown, disabled, or economically disadvantaged.

An ideal learning environment promotes productivity, not control. It empowers students to shape their futures—not fit into someone else’s narrative. It is a place where they are prepared not just to pass tests—but to lead lives with purpose, agency, and freedom.
I will build relationships with parents the same way I lead—through partnership, presence, and purpose. That means creating regular opportunities to engage in open, two-way conversations—not just town halls, but boots-on-the-ground community forums in real time and real spaces.

Parents are the first and most important educators in a child’s life. My goal is to create systems where they’re not just informed after decisions are made—they’re involved before policies are written. I will be accessible, responsive, and committed to showing up where parents are—whether in schools, homes, or community events.

More than anything, I will listen with full attention, empathy, and intention. Building trust with families isn’t about press releases—it’s about consistent, honest communication and a shared commitment to putting children first. I’m here to be a partner—not a politician—and to ensure that the voices of parents are not only heard but respected.
Recruitment is not just about filling positions—it’s about building an environment that good people want to be part of. Unfortunately, our current system has become too politicized, which creates division, fear, and instability. My first strategy would be to depolarize the educational environment by creating clear, politically neutral boundaries around classroom instruction and staff expectations.

I believe in hiring educators and administrators who are focused on teaching—not culture wars. That means upholding professional standards, supporting our staff with the resources they need, and protecting schools from becoming ideological battlegrounds. The classroom should be a place of safety, learning, and development—not conflict or confusion.

To recruit and retain the best talent, we must foster an emotionally safe, focused, and student-centered climate that honors diverse viewpoints without allowing radical or divisive agendas to dominate school culture.
Yes. I believe any curriculum that strays too far from the basics—reading, writing, arithmetic, science, civics, and the arts—needs to be reevaluated. Too many students are graduating unprepared for real-world success, and we see the evidence when they arrive at college only to be placed in remedial courses. That failure is not on the students—it’s on the system.

We need to get back to functional education—skills-based, purpose-driven instruction that prepares youth to either pursue higher education, a trade, or entrepreneurship without requiring them to relearn what they should have mastered in high school. We must prioritize literacy, financial literacy, vocational exploration, and critical thinking over ideological content or excessive testing.

Curriculum reform shouldn’t be political—it should be practical. If it’s not producing confident, competent young adults who can think for themselves and contribute to society, then it’s time to change it.
This is a deeply personal question for me. I’ve always loved technology—I hold a degree in computer technology and have looked forward to AI’s evolution for most of my life. I do believe AI is the future, and I support its responsible use in education. That said, it must be introduced thoughtfully and with limits.

AI should be a supplemental tool, not a replacement for student effort or teacher engagement. I support AI tutors, research assistants, and tools that help students learn how to think, not tools that do the thinking for them. If youth use AI responsibly—as a support, not a crutch—then I’m all for integrating it into learning environments.

But I’m firmly against using AI for everyday schoolwork that undermines cognitive development or critical thought. We don’t want a generation of children who’ve been programmed by machines instead of taught by humans. The goal is for students to become independent thinkers, not passive consumers of AI-generated output.
What’s most memorable and honestly, most heartbreaking is how common the story is. Nearly every person who has reached out to me shares some version of the same painful experience: deep disappointment in a system that is supposed to support children but instead harms them. That repetition alone is powerful. It's not just one story. It's sadly a pattern and that should concern all of us.

What’s even more disturbing is how race, ethnicity, and economic status continue to shape these experiences.

Whether you're navigating special education services, school discipline policies, or classroom bias, the outcomes often depend on your ZIP code and your skin color. That’s what sticks with me. That’s what keeps me up at night. And that’s what fuels my decision to run—not just to listen, but to act, and to change the system for every child and every family.
One of the accomplishments I’m most proud of is learning how to be fully comfortable with being me. That might sound small to some, but for a Black woman, a mother of seven, a grandmother, a community advocate, and a woman who has faced systems meant to silence her—it's everything.

I’ve embraced the grit, tenacity, and raw strength that define who I am. I stand fiercely and unapologetically in my truth—especially when it comes to protecting children. I am the kind of mother, advocate, and leader who is unshakable and unbreakable, or as I like to say, unf*ckwithable, when it comes to the safety and dignity of my children—and yours.

Owning that truth, and refusing to shrink myself to fit anyone’s definition of “professional,” “polite,” or “appropriate,” has become my greatest accomplishment. Because when we show up as our whole selves, we create space for others to do the same—and that’s how real change begins.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Other survey responses

Ballotpedia identified the following surveys, interviews, and questionnaires Burke completed for other organizations. If you are aware of a link that should be added, email us.

See also


External links

Footnotes