Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Janelle Riddle recall, Yakima County, Washington (2018)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Yakima County Clerk recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Janelle Riddle
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2018
Recalls in Washington
Washington recall laws
City official recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall Janelle Riddle from her position as the Yakima County clerk in Washington began in May 2017. The recall was launched by Yakima Valley Business Times editor Bruce Smith and attorneys Rick Kimbrough and Robert Young. They accused Riddle of "malfeasance and misfeasance while in office," according to the statement of charges. Riddle said the issues in the clerk's office had been fixed.[1] In Washington, a superior court judge must rule that the statement of charges is valid before recall proponents can begin collecting signatures. The recall petition was approved, but Riddle appealed the ruling to the state supreme court. The supreme court ruled that the recall could continue on October 26, 2017; however, proponents of the recall decided to end the effort. According to an email from Smith, they decided to end the recall because it would have cost the county about $250,000 and if Riddle was recalled from office, she would have left the office only six months before the end of her term.[2]

The charges against her included failure to transmit child support and restraining orders on time, failure to perform certain in-court duties, failure or delay in creating records for superior court judgments, and not properly maintaining an account of money received by the clerk's office. There was another charge related to billing issues and collecting fees and fines, but the superior court judge found that there was not enough evidence to uphold that charge.[3]

Background

In 2016, an independent panel criticized how the clerk's office was being run. The three-person panel was appointed by the Board of Yakima County Commissioners in March 2016 at the request of the county's Law and Justice Committee.[4] The panel said there were delays in processing no-contact orders and in sending child support orders to the state. It also reported the county had lost out on $200,000 in reimbursements from the state as a result of the clerk's office's delays.[5]

Recall supporters

Bruce Smith said the problems identified by the panel had not been fixed by Riddle. Kimbrough said judges often did not have full files for cases because Riddle had not appropriately implemented the new statewide electronic case management system.[5] Below is the statement of charges against Riddle.

Note: You can navigate the document by zooming in or out with the + and - buttons and using the horizontal and vertical scrollbars on the document.

Yakima Herald-Republic editorial

The Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board published an article on June 4, 2017, calling on Riddle to resign from office. The editorial board, consisting of Bob Crider and Frank Purdy, said they wanted her to resign in order to prevent the county from having to pay for a special election. Below is an excerpt from the editorial board:[6]

Riddle has encountered plenty of opposition almost from Day One of her tenure, and she already has endured plenty of pressure to resign. But the concerns about her reign are only intensifying, and she — and the county court system and county residents — risk the prospect of a sword swinging above her head for the next six months. She should end the drama by stepping away now and letting the clerk’s office begin a return to normalcy.[7]
Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board[6]

Recall opponents

Riddle's response

Riddle said the issues identified by the independent panel had been fixed.[5]

Riddle's attorney

Riddle's attorney, Mark Hood, argued that the "recall petition does not meet the legal and factual sufficiency standards." State law requires that recall petitioners prove that the recall target knowingly committed wrongdoing, Hood said. He continued, "There is no assertion that the clerk was intending to violate the law and that's absolutely required for factual sufficiency."[8]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Washington

The statement of charges was turned in to the Yakima County Auditor’s Office on May 25, 2017, and the proposed ballot language was filed in court on June 8, 2017.[1][9] In Washington, a superior court judge must rule that the statement of charges is valid before recall proponents can begin collecting signatures. On June 19, 2017, Riddle's attorney and the recall petitioners argued their case in the courtroom of Spokane County Superior Court Judge Maryann C. Moreno.[8] That Friday, Judge Moreno ruled that the recall against Riddle could proceed. She found that five of the six charges had enough evidence to be deemed valid.[10]

The process was put on hold after Riddle's attorney filed an objection to the court's order. He said the ballot synopsis by the court reporter contained errors and was over the limit of 200 words.[11] On July 21, 2017, Riddle appealed Judge Moreno's ruling to the Washington Supreme Court.[12] The supreme court ruled on October 26, 2017, that the recall could proceed. Recall proponents earlier in the month said that the effort had been called off, but after the supreme court ruling said the recall effort would continue.[13]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Janelle Riddle Yakima County recall. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes