Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Jefferson D. Sellers

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Jefferson D. Sellers
Image of Jefferson D. Sellers
Prior offices
Oklahoma Judicial District 14

Education

Bachelor's

Cornell University

Law

University of Tulsa

Jefferson D. Sellers was a judge of the Oklahoma Judicial District 14. He left office on May 1, 2020.

Sellers won re-election for judge of the Oklahoma Judicial District 14 outright after the general election on November 6, 2018, was canceled.

Elections

2018

See also: Municipal elections in Tulsa County, Oklahoma (2018)

General election

The general election was canceled. Jefferson D. Sellers (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.

2014

See also: Oklahoma judicial elections, 2014
Sellers ran for re-election to the 14th District Court.
As an unopposed candidate, he was automatically re-elected without appearing on the ballot. [1] 

2010

Sellers was re-elected to the district court after running unopposed.[2]

Main article: Oklahoma judicial elections, 2010

Campaign themes

2018

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Jefferson D. Sellers did not complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey.

Education

Sellers received a B.A. from Cornell University and a J.D. from the University of Tulsa.[3]

Initiative ruling

Sellers ruled on August 24, 2009, that a petition hoping to implement nonpartisan city elections was invalid because not enough signatures were collected. Judge Sellers stated that the Tulsa City Clerk’s Office used a wrong election to set the number of required signatures.

City Councilor John Eagleton stated that the petition was miscalculated because election officials used general election requirements where all qualified voters in Tulsa had a chance to cast ballots. According to Eagleton: "I took an oath to defend the city charter, which I thought was being assailed by an unlawfully approved ballot proposition." Tulsans for Better Government, the group who turned in the petition, gathered 6,994 signatures, a lot more than the 3,427 signatures that were previously needed before the ruling.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes