Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Jesse Borosky
Jesse Borosky ran for election for an at-large seat of the Wichita Public Schools Board of Education in Kansas. Borosky lost in the primary on August 1, 2023.
Borosky completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2023. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Jesse Borosky was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Borosky earned a bachelor's degree from Marywood University in 2015. His career experience includes working as a psychologist. As of 2023, Borosky was affiliated with the following organizations:
- Wichita chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America
- Intersectional Leftist Association at Wichita State University
- Green Group at Wichita State University
- First Unitarian Universalist Church of Wichita[1]
Elections
2023
See also: Wichita Public Schools, Kansas, elections (2023)
General election
General election for Wichita Public Schools, At-large
Melody McCray-Miller defeated Brent Davis in the general election for Wichita Public Schools, At-large on November 7, 2023.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Melody McCray-Miller (Nonpartisan) | 53.4 | 23,806 |
![]() | Brent Davis (Nonpartisan) | 46.2 | 20,580 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.4 | 174 |
Total votes: 44,560 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for Wichita Public Schools, At-large
Melody McCray-Miller and Brent Davis defeated Jesse Borosky, Harlan Bascombe, and Jacob Bakk in the primary for Wichita Public Schools, At-large on August 1, 2023.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Melody McCray-Miller (Nonpartisan) | 54.3 | 14,914 |
✔ | ![]() | Brent Davis (Nonpartisan) | 23.4 | 6,433 |
![]() | Jesse Borosky (Nonpartisan) ![]() | 8.0 | 2,184 | |
Harlan Bascombe (Nonpartisan) | 7.5 | 2,046 | ||
Jacob Bakk (Nonpartisan) | 6.8 | 1,871 |
Total votes: 27,448 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
Borosky received the following endorsements.
Campaign themes
2023
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Jesse Borosky completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2023. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Borosky's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|I am currently a student in Wichita State University’s Clinical-Community Psychology PhD program. My interests include modern treatments for children and adolescents with mental health disorders and applying these treatments in settings such as schools and hospitals. As a student at WSU, I have continued to gain experience working with the children and families of Sedgwick county. I was recently a practicum student at KU School of Medicine’s Wichita office, working with children and their parents.
My academic and clinical work has given me a strong understanding of children’s and teen’s emotional and psychological development. My training has taught me the importance of evidence-based approaches to working with pediatric populations, making me a strong, well-informed candidate for the Wichita Public Schools’ Board of Education.- Many people look at the violence in our schools and the mental health problems our youth face, and don’t recognize that these matters are inextricably linked. Aggression, drug use, depression, anxiety, etc. are all learned behaviors that are conditioned by the factors surrounding us. Similarly to how our children learn math, reading, history, etc., they must also learn how to regulate their emotions and socially interact with one another. If we want to manage these problems that our students experience, we need to do so in a holistic manner that looks at the overall context of the community. Additionally, we must make these decisions based on programs with empirical support, using scientifically sound ways of managing these problems.
- Demographic factors also impact the behaviors and well-being of our students. For example, race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, ability/disability status, etc. play a role in how we perceive ourselves and others. Our attitudes toward each of these are formed by our society and are passed down socially; they are merely social structures and are not innate in society. We need to view these factors and our norms and institutions critically. We often find that these institutions are used to keep some groups in power and others out of power. Teaching our students how to think critically is key to personal development, as well as to the development of great aspects of our society, such as art, philosophy, and science.
- While students are often the major focus in discussions of education, it is important to remember that district personnel such as teachers, paraeducators, bus drivers, custodial staff, etc. all play integral roles in the well-being of our schools. Without these groups, our educational communities cannot function. Despite this, these groups are often targeted by parents, school administrators, etc. as scapegoats when problems arise. They are heavily overburdened with responsibilities while receiving little support and often not being compensated fairly. Our workers and laborers should be celebrated for their efforts, and my goal is to work closely with our personnel and their union representatives to see that their needs are met.
Furthermore, I think policy should be used to ascertain that the needs of every individual are met. Research has demonstrated that programs that supply an individual with their needs are more likely to promote behavioral change than systems that aim to punish negative behaviors. When our students and staff feel unsupported and cannot attend to their most basic needs like nutrition, safety, and security, we can hardly expect them to focus on academic work.
I believe the primary job of a school board member is to create policies that supply the needs of each individual in the district (not only students, but also parents, faculty, and all other staff) and aim to promote positive behavioral change.
Additionally, the students themselves should be considered when creating policy. This group is not always considered to be "constituents" because they cannot vote and are often very young. However, our policies affect them more than anyone else, and thus their voices should be heard. The superintendent's Super Student Advisory Council is a great resource of info from the students of WPS.
There are specific needs that I am aware of being overlooked, such as our students' needs for safe transportation to school, nutritional breakfasts and lunches, and behavioral and cognitive assessments. My intention is to create and strengthen our relationships with various organizations in our city to help see that these needs are met. Additionally, awareness campaigns that are addressed in multiple languages are necessary. Many families simply do not know of the services available to them or the process of how to receive these surveys. It is crucial to raise awareness about such services, while meeting our communities members where they are instead of demanding they come to us.
Progeny (non-profit focusing on ending the school to prison pipeline)
Wichita LGBT+ Health Coalition (a coalition working in conjunction with KU School of Medicine to provide the medical needs of LGBT+ folks)
Spanish Ad Hoc Translations LLC (A group that provides interpreting of multiple different languages commonly spoken in Sedgwick County)
Safe Streets Wichita (Organization that practices harm reduction practices, such as providing Naloxone and fentanyl test strips to individuals)
Positive Directions, Inc. (Provides testing of HIV and infections diseases to both pediatric and adult populations)
International Rescue Committee Kansas (Provides support to immigrants and refugees)
Alce Su Voz (advocacy group focusing on the needs of Spanish-speakers)
Equality Kansas and the Center of Wichita (EQKS and the Center are partnered to provide a drop-in shelter for LGBT+ youth)
Kansas Prevention Collaborative (An organization created by the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services aimed at preventing and reducing mental health disparities and suicide risk)
Inspyre Research Lab and Behavioral Community Research and Action Team (Research labs in the Wichita State University Psychology Department that focus on treatment and research in pediatric populations)
Equity Initiative (Youth development organization based in the community)
Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (Non-profit organization that aims to educate regarding the needs of LGBT+ folks and create safe schools)
Sierra Club (organization aiming to protect our environment)
Kansas National Education Association (Organization aimed at supporting K-12 education)
Other aspects of a good teacher relate to what we consider to be necessary facets of strong relationships in psychotherapy. These include genuineness (which I have addressed elsewhere), empathy, and unconditional positive regard. These are not simply personality traits a person has. Rather, they change with the context of the relationship. Many therapists have clients that they do not feel positively about; however, there are ways we can manage our own behaviors and regulate our own emotions to prevent our feelings from dictating the way we interact with others. Similarly, teachers can respond to students in a genuine, empathetic, and positive manner, even if they can recognize the struggles they have with that student.
Good teaching should also be based on methods that are empirically supported. This is a key aspect of teaching as otherwise our students may be learning inaccurate information or may have difficulty learning due to the inefficient style.
Similar to being in the community, being present is a key method of measuring this. Observation and interaction with the teachers (in a non-critical way) can be very informative. Also, measuring improvements in students' grades will be a useful objective method.
I would also like to see curricula that help students explore their identities and think critically about themselves and their institutions. Self-exploration and critical thinking skills are important in not only a multitude of careers, they are generally useful traits that benefit our lives and communities. Fostering these behaviors in our students will help them both in the present, and as they progress to become the future generation of leaders.
Additionally, I think it may be useful for our schools to seek funding via grants. While I don't think it should be necessary to have to do this, this still can be beneficial, especially if the school implements new strategies that are being research empirically.
Aside from student violence, many other factors impact students' safety, such as the unsafe routes they take to school. Most students have to travel to school or find rides, as the district only offers transportation to students that are >2.5 miles away. In our city, there have been numerous cases of pedestrians and cyclists hit and killed by cars this year alone, as well as multiple instances of kidnappings. In order to mitigate this risk, chaperones to school, changes in bike and walking paths to school, and increased availability of bussing are necessary.
Next, I think expanding our relationships with organizations in the area, as well as creating new relationships, would be beneficial. For example, the WPS already has a relationship with Comcare as a means of providing services to students. It would also be beneficial to create relationships with local universities that have departments specializing in these areas. For example, Friends University, Wichita State University, and the KU School of Medicine all have staff and students that need practicum and internship hours. I imagine setting up a working relationship with these entities would increase the available mental health support needed in our schools.
We also should adopt policies and programs that would help manage mental health. Mental health and psychopathology are contextual in nature, meaning that they are largely dependent on the world around us. Making policies that manage the social difficulties faced by our students and staff/faculty would be hugely important. Acknowledging institutions that negatively impact women, LGBT+ folks, BIPOC, and individuals with disabilities and addressing these issues will help reduce the impact of mental health difficulties.
An ideal learning environment will also not be treated as one-size-fits-all. Many students with various cognitive, social, emotional, or behavioral delays or differences cannot learn in the same manner as others, or at the very least it is not as effective for them to do so. Instead, making sure the needs of each individual student is met would be beneficial. In an ideal world, nearly every student would have what would amount to an individualized education plan, and they would receive the services that suit each aspect of their way they learn. This of course cannot be implemented in reality, but recognizing the importance of idiographic approaches to learning and behavior is useful when guiding policy.
This is not a process that is simple and immediate. Consistent interaction with folks is necessary to build strong, honest relationships with others. This honesty is necessary, as not all parents/citizens feel comfortable expressing their needs immediately. Relationships built on genuineness (similar to the relationships we adopt in therapy) are necessary to have a positive relationship with our constituents and attend to their needs appropriately.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
See also
2023 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on July 3, 2023