Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Joe Pool Jr.

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from Joe Pool, Jr.)
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Joe Pool Jr.
Image of Joe Pool Jr.
Elections and appointments
Last election

March 5, 2024

Education

Bachelor's

University of Texas, 1977

Law

University of Texas at Austin, 1980

Personal
Birthplace
Dallas, Texas
Religion
Methodist Episcopal
Profession
Judge
Contact

Joe Pool Jr. (Democratic Party) ran for election for the Place 6 judge of the Texas Supreme Court. He lost in the Democratic primary on March 5, 2024.

Pool completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Joe Pool Jr. was born in Dallas, Texas. Pool's career experience includes working as a judge. He earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Texas in 1977 and a law degree from the University of Texas at Austin in 1980.[1]

Pool has been affiliated with the following organizations:[1]

  • Democratic Party
  • Austin School of Film
  • Media in Motion
  • Voter Campaign Finance Reform

Elections

2024

See also: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2024

General election

General election for Texas Supreme Court Place 6

Incumbent Jane Bland defeated Bonnie Lee Goldstein and David Roberson in the general election for Texas Supreme Court Place 6 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jane Bland
Jane Bland (R)
 
56.2
 
6,145,167
Image of Bonnie Lee Goldstein
Bonnie Lee Goldstein (D)
 
40.5
 
4,425,189
Image of David Roberson
David Roberson (L)
 
3.3
 
355,485

Total votes: 10,925,841
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas Supreme Court Place 6

Bonnie Lee Goldstein defeated Joe Pool Jr. in the Democratic primary for Texas Supreme Court Place 6 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Bonnie Lee Goldstein
Bonnie Lee Goldstein
 
73.1
 
646,690
Image of Joe Pool Jr.
Joe Pool Jr. Candidate Connection
 
26.9
 
237,465

Total votes: 884,155
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas Supreme Court Place 6

Incumbent Jane Bland advanced from the Republican primary for Texas Supreme Court Place 6 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Jane Bland
Jane Bland
 
100.0
 
1,690,507

Total votes: 1,690,507
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Libertarian convention

Libertarian convention for Texas Supreme Court Place 6

David Roberson advanced from the Libertarian convention for Texas Supreme Court Place 6 on April 14, 2024.

Candidate
Image of David Roberson
David Roberson (L)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Pool in this election.

2016

See also: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2016

Pool ran against incumbent Justice Eva Guzman (R) for a seat on the Texas Supreme Court. Guzman defeated Pool in the March 1 Republican primary and will face the Democratic candidate, Savannah Robinson, in the November general election.[2]

March 1 primary
Texas Supreme Court, Place 9, Republican Primary, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Republican Green check mark transparent.png Eva Guzman Incumbent 59.17% 1,268,415
     Republican Joe Pool, Jr. 40.83% 875,224
Total Votes (100% Reporting) 2,143,639
Source: Texas Secretary of State Official Results

2014

Railroad Commission

See also: Texas down ballot state executive elections, 2014

Pool announced his candidacy for election to the office of Texas Railroad Commission in 2014. However, he did not file by the December 9, 2013 deadline. The general election took place on November 4, 2014.[3]

Texas Supreme Court

Pool ran for election to the Texas Supreme Court.
Primary: He was defeated in the Republican primary on March 4, 2014, receiving 28.1 percent of the vote. He competed against Jeff Brown. [4][5][6]

Polling

Below are the results of the 2014 judicial poll, conducted by the State Bar of Texas, which asked attorneys to cast a vote in favor of their preferred candidate in each appellate race.[7]

Place 6 Justice
Candidate: Votes:
Mark Ash 699
Jeff Brown 3907
Lawrence Meyers 3263
Joe Pool, Jr. 1672

2012

See also: Texas judicial elections, 2012

Pool was defeated in the Republican primary on May 29, receiving 28.1% of the vote.[8][9]

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Joe Pool Jr. completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Pool's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am Joe Pool a firm choice for Texas Supreme Court Place 6. I am currently serving as the 428th Texas Judicial District Judge. My father was Congressman-At-Large Joe Pool who is responsible for the Guadalupe Mountains National Park as well as the Padre Island National Seashore. I have been practicing law in Texas for more than 30 years. I served 5 years as the General Counsel for The Dripping Springs Water Supply Corporation. I coached women’s, men’s and children’s soccer teams in Austin and in Dripping Springs for 25 years. I am one of the founders of the Austin Municipal Soccer League. I have provided pro bono legal services to the Austin School of Film over the last 20 years. Every year I provide pro bono legal services to those who cannot afford an attorney. Most of these services have been provided to women or women’s organizations. In 2017 I sued President Trump to stop him from continuing to establish an Islamic Republic/theocracy in Afghanistan with our tax dollars. This 100 Billion a year in aid and security services to the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan was a violation of the Establishment Clause, an Islamic theocracy established by Congressional laws, and a violation of the Freedom of Religion Clause, President and Vice President must be Muslim. One of the reasons I filed this suit was to educate Congress and the Executive Branch that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”. 1st Amendment.
  • In Texas the oath of a Supreme Court Justice swears that she "will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of the State of Texas." The 67 2020 stolen election lawsuits filed by Trump have been fully and finally adjudicated resulting in 67 precedents holding the 2020 election was not stolen. The Republican Party of Texas’s Platform states, “We reject the certified results of the 2020 Presidential Election, and we hold that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States.” The sitting Republican Supreme Court Justice for Place 6 denies 67 legal precedents and shows you why you should vote for me, Joe Pool, for Texas Supreme Court Pl 6.
  • The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. Art. 1. Sec. 15. TX Const. We are the only country in the world with the right to determine private property rights and other civil rights with twelve of your neighbors. The GDP greatness of the U.S. owes much to this civil right. When you risk your paychecks to start your garage business you know, you can rely upon 12 neighbors to protect your property rights. Under unanimous Republican control for 20 years this civil right has been severely diminished with no-evidence summary judgements being granted to the party that had the burden of proof and other suppressive actions. The only way our Founders intended Judges to be elected is if the right of trail by jury remained unviolated.
  • In Cox v. Texas the Texas Supreme Court ruled Kate Cox did not qualify for an abortion under the medical exception to the state’s near-total abortion ban. Kate ultimately had to travel out of state to have the procedure. The Texas Supreme Court with all republican justices for over 20 years decided Kate must carry and birth a trisonomy 18 baby. A trisonomy pregnancy involves a high risk of stillbirths and fetal loss. Only 50% of infants diagnosed with trisomy 18 live beyond 1 week of age. Only 5–10% will survive beyond 1 year. Only a handful survive to adulthood. This survival is painful requiring constant monitoring and substantial medical resources.
Something I originated, am passionate about and I named is Voter Campaign Finance Reform. Only those who may vote in an election may give campaign contributions to a candidate in the same election. If you can't vote in my congressional district then I don't want your money determining who my Congressman is. Anyone can speak about the candidates, but only those who may vote in an election can do paid speech. VCFR would stop the paid speech from multi-million dollar organizations. No organization or corporation may vote in an election and therefore, they may not contribute money to any candidate. The systems and processes to enforce Voter Campaign Finance Reform are already in place for state and federal elections.
Most important for an elected official in Texas is to follow the oath of office: "will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God. Today we have conflict in the Texas Judiciary. Can a justice continue to serve when they deny 67 precedents concerning the 2020 election? I think not.
Follow the rules and do not be cavalier about your compliance or lack thereof. My Democratic Primary opponent did not comply with Texas Ethics Commission rules which require candidates to file an Amended Judicial Candidate's Treasurer Appointment before they start collecting signatures on their candidate petitions. I complied. My primary opponent did not.
I was a manager trainee/cook at Kip's Big Boy on Marsh Lane in Dallas. I had this job for less than a year.
Ebony Ivory living in perfect harmony.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely, 20 years of Republican unanimous control has led the Texas Supreme Court to do things it is not authorized to do. Section 22.225 - Effect of Judgment in Civil Cases
(a) A judgment of a court of appeals is conclusive on the facts of the case in all civil cases. Many times the Texas Supreme Court has redetermined facts in a civil case. This is improper because the facts are conclusive at the Courts of Appeal. See above.
I am always going to be fair, impartial and apply the law and precedents to the facts in a case. I bring a little more to my judgements because of my business background. I am able to see or suspect BS that other judges won't or can't see
I most admire Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Hortense Ward (1872–1944) for all of her accomplishments on the way to the Supreme Court bench. Hortense Ward was a schoolteacher, mother to 3 daughters, champion of women's rights, suffrage leader, the first woman admitted to the Texas bar and a very effective political activist. In her early career as an attorney she had to overcome an extreme male bias in the Texas Judiciary. Hortense feared her appearance as an attorney might prejudice all-male juries. So, she limited her work to writing briefs and consultations.

Hortense’s political accomplishments in the state of Texas are legendary. She worked to get the
Married Woman's Property Law of 1913 passed by the Texas Legislature. She campaigned for a
fifty-four-hour workweek for women in industry, a women's division in the Texas department of
labor, the first domestic relations court, and the right of women to serve as officers of corporations. She helped lead an intense lobbying campaign in 1917 on behalf of the federal woman suffrage amendment, which narrowly passed the United States House in January 1918. Hortense convinced six of the eighteen Texas congressmen to vote for the amendment. In 1918
Hortense successfully lobbied to allow women to vote in state primary elections. In 1918 Hortense’s pamphlet, Instructions for Women Voters, distributed statewide, with her public appearances started a grassroots campaign that registered 386,000 women voters in just

seventeen days. In January 1925 Hortense Ward’s great works for the state of Texas were acknowledged as she was appointed by Governor Pat Neff to be chief justice of the Supreme Court to replace a recused Justice.

Tort Reform judicial activism that is trying to punish legitimate plaintiffs just because they asked for a jury to determine their property rights.
What do you get when you cross an elephant with a rhinoceros? ElifIknow
Republishing Endorsements have the appearance of impropriety.
A Dallas Office of Police Oversight among others released a report showing 69% of arrests for under 2oz of pot were black, 22% were Latino and 4% were White. This racial profiling is unconstitutional and results in a racial disparity in unnecessary searches, seizures and civil asset forfeitures. I will not allow this racial profiling to stand resulting in unnecessary searches, seizures and civil asset forfeitures. This allowed racial profiling is happening in my primary opponent's district.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Joe Pool Jr. campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024* Texas Supreme Court Place 6Lost primary$17,746 $14,444
Grand total$17,746 $14,444
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* Data from this year may not be complete

See also


External links

Footnotes