Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

John Messinger

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
John Messinger
Republican Party
Candidate, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9
Elections and appointments
Last election
November 5, 2024
Next election
March 3, 2026
Education
Law
Baylor Law School, 2006
Personal
Religion
Baptist
Profession
Prosecutor
Contact
Campaign website
Campaign Facebook
Personal Facebook

John Messinger (Republican Party) is running for election for the Place 9 judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. He is on the ballot in the Republican primary on March 3, 2026.[source]

Biography

John Messinger's career experience includes working as a prosecutor. He earned a law degree from Baylor Law School in 2006. Messinger has been affiliated with Radiance Women's Center.[1]

Elections

2026

See also: Texas Supreme Court elections, 2026

General election

The primary will occur on March 3, 2026. The general election will occur on November 3, 2026. General election candidates will be added here following the primary.

Democratic primary

Democratic primary for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9

Holly Taylor (D) is running in the Democratic primary for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9 on March 3, 2026.

Candidate
Image of Holly Taylor
Holly Taylor

There are no incumbents in this race.

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary

Republican primary for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9

Jennifer Balido (R) and John Messinger (R) are running in the Republican primary for Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9 on March 3, 2026.

Candidate
Image of Jennifer Balido
Jennifer Balido
Image of John Messinger
John Messinger

There are no incumbents in this race.

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Messinger received the following endorsements. To send us additional endorsements, click here.

2024

See also: Texas intermediate appellate court elections, 2024

General election

General election for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2

Maggie Ellis defeated John Messinger in the general election for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2 on November 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
✔
Image of Maggie Ellis
Maggie Ellis (D) Candidate Connection
 
50.9
 
700,587
Image of John Messinger
John Messinger (R) Candidate Connection
 
49.1
 
675,885

There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source

Total votes: 1,376,472
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary runoff election

Democratic primary runoff for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2

Maggie Ellis defeated incumbent Edward Smith in the Democratic primary runoff for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2 on May 28, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
✔
Image of Maggie Ellis
Maggie Ellis Candidate Connection
 
65.0
 
17,385
Image of Edward Smith
Edward Smith
 
35.0
 
9,362

Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source

Total votes: 26,747
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2

Maggie Ellis and incumbent Edward Smith advanced to a runoff. They defeated Melissa Lorber in the Democratic primary for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
✔
Image of Maggie Ellis
Maggie Ellis Candidate Connection
 
40.5
 
56,909
✔
Image of Edward Smith
Edward Smith
 
31.5
 
44,192
Image of Melissa Lorber
Melissa Lorber Candidate Connection
 
28.0
 
39,337

Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source

Total votes: 140,438
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2

John Messinger advanced from the Republican primary for Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
✔
Image of John Messinger
John Messinger Candidate Connection
 
100.0
 
185,153

There were no incumbents in this race. The results have been certified. Source

Total votes: 185,153
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign finance

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Messinger in this election.

Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

John Messinger has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are John Messinger, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for.  More than 24,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

Help improve Ballotpedia - send us candidate contact info.


Campaign website

Messinger's campaign website stated the following:

“

Justice Through Law Enforcement

Our system of justice is not perfect. No system made by man is. We can improve it, but that improvement doesn’t come from judges doing whatever they think is right in their own eyes. It comes from enforcing the laws as written to find out what works and what doesn’t. In every sense, law enforcement is essential to justice.

It’s Your Court. Take it Back.

Many recent opinions from the Court of Criminal Appeals ignore or conflict with applicable law, its own decisions, or both. Perhaps worse, last year the average time it took them to review a lower court decision increased to over 500 days. Imagine waiting an extra year to find out if you will have to face your attacker at a new trial. Imagine sitting in prison for an extra year before being released. Both are unacceptable. Your vote can help change that.

Experience Matters

I am a career appellate prosecutor. By virtue of the job God has blessed me with at the Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, almost no one practicing law today has as much experience in the Court of Criminal Appeals as I do. My opponent filed one writ application in 2013. The choice is clear. [2]

”
—John Messinger's campaign website (2026)[3]


2024

Candidate Connection

John Messinger completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Messinger's responses.

Expand all | Collapse all

I am a Christian, a husband, and a father of three young children (6, 4, and 2). I moved to Texas to go to law school because I wanted to live and raise a family in a place that valued freedom. I believe that you cannot have freedom without responsibility. Too much of the conversation today is about what is owed to people instead of what is expected of them. I try to be thankful for the things God has given me.
  • In a system of law, you don't get justice without following the law. Many people casually toss the word "justice" around. It doesn't mean "whatever one thinks is fair." Reasonable people disagree about what is fair. When people disagree about matters of law, they are settled in courts. If judges did whatever they felt was right or fair in a given case, there would be no system of justice. All we would have are little dictators who decide things differently from Court to court and county to county.
  • If the law seems unfair, go to the Legislature and get it fixed. Sometimes, accurate application of the law leads to results that were unforeseen. Sometimes, the results were intended but the voters change their minds about what they want the law to be. In either event, the answer is to have a discussion in the branch of government designed to make law: the legislative branch. It is not the job of judges to decide what they think Texans want and to make the law say that.
  • Experience matters. Real experience. Any lawyer who has managed not to get disbarred for ten years can run for a court of appeals. Although it is certainly possible for one of them to acquire the expertise to manage a busy docket, issue sixty or more opinions a year, and participate in twice as many other cases, it is nice when a candidate for an appellate court has experience doing appeals. For the last 13+ years, my job has been to evaluate the opinions of courts of appeals and, if necessary, have them corrected by the highest criminal court in Texas. I've written hundreds of briefs and petitions for discretionary review. Very few people have comparable experience.
I am a career prosecutor, so I tend to focus on the nuts and bolts of government: rule of law, functioning courts, etc. But the real problem underlying most others is the breakdown of the family. A lot of well-meaning people crafted policies that have demonstrably had the unintended consequence of weakening families. No amount of money can replace the structure that intact families provide. It starts with valuing life. It continues with commitment to your spouse and children. Government can try to incentivize (or at least not discourage it) these things but change needs to start at home and in our communities.
Humility. Public service should be just that: service. You have a job people have trusted you to do. That job existed before you and will exist after you. An elected official should remember that.
I am well-qualified for the job but understand it is not about me. It is easy for any elected official, forced to run for office and earn votes, to get caught up in seeing their name on signs and in voter guides and whatnot. It is probably why so many politicians don't know when to leave. I've lived almost 50 years before all of this and will enjoy whatever life God gives me if my political life ends in November.
An appellate judge should fairly administer the law and write opinions that ordinary people can understand so they can decide whether to pursue further appeal (if possible) or a legislative fix (where applicable). Fair administration requires ignoring the identities and social positions of the parties and not giving into compassion; Lady Justice is blind for a reason.
Probably the Challenger explosion. I would have been 8 or 9 years old.
I worked at our local library as a page for about two years in high school.
No. It is a vital quality for human beings. In our everyday interactions, we should be mindful that we cannot know each other's hearts or what experiences led everyone to where we meet them. But empathy is a terrible quality for a judge, especially an appellate judge. The last thing anyone should want is a judge who lets his feelings about one or both parties influence his decision. Again, Lady Justice is blind for a reason.
The person I chose to run against had no appellate experience before he ran in 2018 and no other experience that spoke to his ability to get the job done. His tenure did not convince me otherwise. I was not alone. He drew two primary challengers and lost his runoff.
Lack of expertise. There are far too many jurists, especially on the appellate level, who lack the ability to dispassionately decide cases in a timely manner. I've seen firsthand what happens when everyone has to sit around for years wondering whether a court of appeals will, for example, uphold a penal law. Victims, police, prosecutors, and lower judges all had to wait for over three years to know whether their cases could proceed. That delay can cause anxiety, permit further criminality, and of course costs money. People deserve to have their claims settled as correctly as possible as quickly as possible. A court of appeals is no place for on-the-job training.
My legal passion is criminal law. I never thought I would run for this position. If I run again, it would be for the Court of Criminal Appeals.
A man and a woman strike up a conversation. They're getting along famously until they discover they are in different political parties. The man says, "I'm surprised you're a Democrat; you seem smart." The woman replies, "I'm surprised you're a Republican; you seem like a decent human being."

I hope both sides can laugh at that. We have a lot more in common than we don't.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

Campaign finance summary

Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.

John Messinger campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2024Texas Third District Court of Appeals Place 2Lost general$36,418 $44,248
Grand total$36,418 $44,248
Sources: OpenSecrets,  Federal Elections Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

See also

2026 Elections

Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
What's on the ballot?
U.S. Congress
U.S. Congress special elections
State executives
State legislatures
State courts
Ballot measures
Municipal government
School boards
Election analysis hub

Government

Seal of Texas.png
Who represents me?
U.S. Congress
State executives
State legislators
State courts
Ballot measures
Municipal government
School boards

Newsletters

Ballotpedia RSS.jpg
The Daily Brew
The Weekly Brew
The Ballot Bulletin
Checks and Balances
Economy and Society
Hall Pass
Number of the Day
Robe & Gavel
Union Station


External links

Candidate

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9
  • Website
  • Facebook
    		•

    Personal

  • Facebook
    		•

    Footnotes

    1. ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on July 30, 2024
    2. ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    3. ↑ John Messinger's campaign website, “Home,” accessed January 15, 2026


    Flag of Texas
    v • e
    State of Texas
    Austin (capital)
    Elections

    What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

    Government

    Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy


    Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=John_Messinger&oldid=11028930"