Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

John O'Connor (Oklahoma)

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from John O’Connor (Oklahoma))
Jump to: navigation, search
John O'Connor
Image of John O'Connor
Prior offices
Attorney General of Oklahoma
Successor: Gentner Drummond

Elections and appointments
Last election

June 28, 2022

Education

Bachelor's

Oklahoma State University

Law

University of Tulsa College of Law

Personal
Profession
Attorney
Contact

John O'Connor (Republican Party) was the Attorney General of Oklahoma. He assumed office on July 23, 2021. He left office on January 9, 2023.

O'Connor (Republican Party) ran for re-election for Attorney General of Oklahoma. He lost in the Republican primary on June 28, 2022.

O'Connor was appointed as the state's attorney general by Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) on July 23, 2021, to succeed Mike Hunter (R). He was sworn in the same day.[1]

O'Connor was a nominee to a split seat on the United States District Courts for the Northern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Oklahoma. President Donald Trump (R) submitted his nomination on April 10, 2018.[2] O'Connor's nomination was not confirmed by the U.S. Senate before the conclusion of the 115th United States Congress, and he withdrew from consideration for re-nomination on April 12, 2019. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R) said, "While I understand John’s decision to withdraw, I don’t like it ... We are missing out on an opportunity to place a person of the highest integrity and competence on the federal bench to serve all Oklahomans."[3]

Biography

John O'Connor earned a bachelor's degree in political science from Oklahoma State University and a law degree from the University of Tulsa. O'Connor's career experience includes working as an attorney with the Hall Estill law firm. He served as the president of the Rotary Club of Tulsa and as the president and director of Tulsa's Ronald McDonald House.[4]

Elections

2022

See also: Oklahoma Attorney General election, 2022

General election

General election for Attorney General of Oklahoma

Gentner Drummond defeated Lynda Steele in the general election for Attorney General of Oklahoma on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Gentner Drummond
Gentner Drummond (R)
 
73.8
 
792,466
Image of Lynda Steele
Lynda Steele (L) Candidate Connection
 
26.2
 
281,923

Total votes: 1,074,389
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Attorney General of Oklahoma

Gentner Drummond defeated incumbent John O'Connor in the Republican primary for Attorney General of Oklahoma on June 28, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Gentner Drummond
Gentner Drummond
 
50.9
 
180,444
Image of John O'Connor
John O'Connor
 
49.1
 
174,256

Total votes: 354,700
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Libertarian primary election

The Libertarian primary election was canceled. Lynda Steele advanced from the Libertarian primary for Attorney General of Oklahoma.

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

John O'Connor did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

Federal judicial nomination

See also: Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump

United States District Courts for the Western, Eastern, and Northern Districts of Oklahoma

See also: ABA ratings during the Trump administration

On April 10, 2018, President Donald Trump nominated O'Connor to be a judge on the United States District Courts for the Western District, Eastern District, and Northern District of Oklahoma.[2]

On August 21, 2018, the American Bar Association standing committee on the federal judiciary unanimously rated John O'Connor as not qualified for his nomination to the United States District Courts for the Western, Eastern, and Northern Districts of Oklahoma.

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: John O'Connor
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Progress
Returned 268 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: April 10, 2018
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Not Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: July 11, 2018
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
DefeatedAReported:  
DefeatedAConfirmed:
DefeatedAReturned: January 3, 2019

In a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, committee Chair Paul Moxley wrote, "The consensus based on confidential peer review is that Mr. O'Connor lacks sufficient litigation experience, going to the depth and breadth of his law practice to date. His judgment was also found to be deficient." He further wrote that the peer review "revealed several instances of ethical concerns."[5] Click here to read the committee's written statement.

In an email to The Oklahoman, O'Connor said he had "received the highest peer ratings for ethics and competence" throughout his career. He also said that none of the committee members knew him or previously worked with him.[5]

O'Connor was the fifth federal judicial candidate nominated by President Trump to be rated "not qualified." The ABA's assessment in 2017 that some of President Trump's judicial nominees were not qualified for their positions prompted responses from senators and from various media outlets. Click here for more information about ABA ratings during the Trump administration and what proponents and opponents said.

O'Connor withdrew from consideration for re-nomination on April 12, 2019.[3]

Responses to O'Connor's ABA rating

U.S. Sens. James Lankford (R) and Jim Inhofe (R) expressed support for O'Connor's nomination. Lankford referred to the ABA review process as unfair, disappointing, and hypocritical. Inhofe said he was disappointed in the rating but added that the ABA's "opinion should not outweigh the fact that John had a successful appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee" in July.[5]

See also


External links

Footnotes