Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

John Stultz III

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
John Stultz III

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
North Carolina 9th Judicial District


John Stultz III is a judge for the 9A Judicial District in North Carolina. He was elected in the general election on November 8, 2016.

Elections

2016

See also: North Carolina local trial court judicial elections, 2016

North Carolina held general elections for local judicial offices on November 8, 2016. A primary election took place on March 15, 2016.[1] John Stultz III defeated incumbent Lloyd M. Gentry in the North Carolina Judicial District 9A general election for the Gentry seat.[2]

North Carolina Judicial District 9A (Gentry Seat), General Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png John Stultz III 52.49% 14,504
Lloyd M. Gentry Incumbent 47.51% 13,130
Total Votes 27,634
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Unofficial election results," accessed November 8, 2016

Selection method

See also: Partisan election of judges

The North Carolina District Courts utilize partisan elections in the selection of judges. District judges serve four-year terms, after which they must run for re-election if they wish to continue serving. From 2002 through 2016, elections for district court judges were nonpartisan; however, on March 23, 2017, the North Carolina legislature changed the method of election to partisan elections by overriding Gov. Roy Cooper's veto of HB 100. This change was effective with the 2018 district court elections.[3][4][5]

Qualifications
To serve on this court, a judge must be:[3]

  • licensed to practice law in the state;
  • a district resident; and
  • under the age of 72 (retirement at 72 is mandatory).

See also

External links

Footnotes