Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Judges appointed by Maura Healey

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
StateExecLogo.png
State Executive Offices

Elections by Year
202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011
State Executive Analyses
Compensation
Education
Irregular office changes
Place of birth
Term limits
Trifectas and triplexes
Vacancy procedures

This page lists judges appointed by Maura Healey (D) during her term as Governor of Massachusetts. As of today, the total number of Healey appointees was 9. For the full profile of Healey, click here.

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population. Some Massachusetts judges are outside of that coverage scope. As a result, this page does not provide an exhaustive list of all judges appointed by Gov. Healey.

Appointment process

In Massachusetts, the governor select a judge to fill a vacancy on a court. Before a judge can take office, she or he must be approved by the Governor's Council.[1]

Appointed judges

The tables below list the governor's appointees to the courts across the state. These lists are updated automatically with new appointments.

State Courts

Supreme Court

Name Court Active

Gabrielle R. Wolohojian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

April 22, 2024 - Present

Elizabeth Dewar

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

January 12, 2024 - Present

Court of Appeals

Name Court Active

Jennifer Allen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

July 28, 2025 - Present

Chauncey Wood

Massachusetts Appeals Court

December 4, 2024 - Present

Robert E. Toone

Massachusetts Appeals Court

December 22, 2023 - Present

Gloria Y. Tan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

December 4, 2024 - Present


Local Courts

Name Court Active

Adam Sisitsky

Massachusetts Superior Court

2024 - Present

Tracy Duncan

Massachusetts Superior Court

Michael Pineault

Massachusetts Superior Court


Judicial selection process

See also: Judicial selection in Massachusetts
Judicial selection in Massachusetts
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Method:   Gubernatorial appointment
Term:   Until age 70
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Method:   Assisted appointment
Term:   Until age 70
Massachusetts Superior Courts
Method:   Assisted appointment
Term:   Until age 70


Judicial selection refers to the process used to select judges for courts. At the state level, methods of judicial selection vary substantially in the United States, and in some cases between different court types within a state. There are six primary types of judicial selection: partisan and nonpartisan elections, the Michigan method, assisted appointment, gubernatorial appointment, and legislative elections. To read more about how these selection methods are used across the country, click here.

This article covers how state court judges are selected in Massachusetts, including:

As of April 2025, the selection of supreme court judges in Massachusetts occurred through gubernatorial appointment with approval from the Governor's Council.[2] Judges of the appeals court, superior court, and limited jurisdiction courts are selected through assisted appointment where a judicial nominating commission presents a list of nominees to the governor who then picks an appointee with approval from the Governor's Council.[3] Massachusetts is one of only a few states in which judges serve lifetime appointments. They are, however, required to retire by age 70.[3]

Click here to notify us of changes to judicial selection methods in this state.

Appellate state court selection in the United States, by general selection method[4]


State courts and their selection methods across the U.S., including the District of Columbia[4]
Method Supreme Court (of 53)[5] Courts of Appeal (of 46) Trial Courts (of 147)
Partisan elections (PE) 8 6 39
Nonpartisan elections (NPE) 13 16 34
Legislative elections (LE) 2 2 5
Gubernatorial appointment of judges (GA) 5 3 6
Assisted appointment (AA) 22 18 46
Combination or other 3[6] 1[7] 17[8]

State profile

Demographic data for Massachusetts
 MassachusettsU.S.
Total population:6,784,240316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):7,8003,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:79.6%73.6%
Black/African American:7.1%12.6%
Asian:6%5.1%
Native American:0.2%0.8%
Pacific Islander:0%0.2%
Two or more:2.9%3%
Hispanic/Latino:10.6%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:89.8%86.7%
College graduation rate:40.5%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$68,563$53,889
Persons below poverty level:13.1%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Massachusetts.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Presidential voting pattern

See also: Presidential voting trends in Massachusetts

Massachusetts voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.


More Massachusetts coverage on Ballotpedia

See also

Massachusetts Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Massachusetts.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Massachusetts
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Massachusetts
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes

  1. American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Massachusetts," archived October 2, 2014
  2. Gubernatorial appointment takes place when the governor directly selects judges.
  3. 3.0 3.1 American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection," accessed August 25, 2021
  4. 4.0 4.1 American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection," archived February 2, 2015
  5. Both Oklahoma and Texas have two state supreme courts: one for civil matters and one for criminal matters.
  6. Michigan and Ohio use nonpartisan general elections with candidates selected through partisan primaries or conventions. In the District of Columbia, judges are selected in the same manner as federal judges.
  7. Judges of the North Dakota Court of Appeals are appointed on an as-needed basis by the supreme court justices.
  8. Most courts that use combination/alternative methods (for example, mayoral appointment) are local level courts. These courts are often governed by selection guidelines that are unique to their specific region.